Hello, Elias here.

I wanted to bring up a couple things, the first being a quick plan of action.

We have some solid sources here, but we have yet to pull it together into a final form. I hope that we can set up some sort of correspondence as far as actions to be taken, because I don't anyone to get left behind on this project.

To be quite frank, my main issue insofar as actually winning the debate is that we have no solid footing whatsoever in terms of actual research because in reality, our side of the debate is scientifically wrong. For this reason we basically have to use sources that are by their nature partial. It is going to be difficult winning this debate but in projects like this phrasing is everything.

Well we have a good spread of sources thus-far, and i like the layout of the opening statement. I might suggest mentioning early on the link between the availability of nearly unlimited sources leading to a decrease in source validity awareness. Other than that i think that's a good framework to start out with.