1. "Look Up the List" Vocabulary Instruction
This is what it's like to grow up in the age of likes, lols and longing | The Washingto... - 0 views
UnboundEd - About - 1 views
Google Classroom - 1 views
How To: Create an Interactive E-Book with Google Slides | Mr. Kamrowski - 1 views
What Doesn't Work: Literacy Practices We Should Abandon | Edutopia - 0 views
-
-
2. Giving Students Prizes for Reading
-
3. Weekly Spelling Tests
- ...3 more annotations...
Homepage - EverFi - 1 views
CURMUDGUCATION: Norms vs. Standards - 1 views
-
A standards-referenced test compares every student to the standard set by the test giver. A norm-referenced test compares every student to every other student. The lines between different levels of achievement will be set after the test has been taken and corrected. Then the results are laid out, and the lines between levels (cut scores) are set.
-
When I give my twenty word spelling test, I can't set the grade levels until I correct it. Depending on the results, I may "discover" that an A is anything over a fifteen, twelve is Doing Okay, and anything under nine is failing. Or I may find that twenty is an A, nineteen is okay, and eighteen or less is failing. If you have ever been in a class where grades are curved, you were in a class that used norm referencing.
-
With standards reference, we can set a solid immovable line between different levels of achievement, and we can do it before the test is even given. This week I'm giving a spelling test consisting of twenty words. Before I even give the test, I can tell my class that if they get eighteen or more correct, they get an A, if they get sixteen correct, they did okay, and if the get thirteen or less correct, they fail.
- ...4 more annotations...
Five keys to closing achievement gaps with blended learning | District Administration M... - 0 views
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20▼ items per page