Payment protection insurance, what exactly was the judicial ruling in May - 0 views

• 
  #1 mariabrogersm on 13 Jun 14

   

  In May, a very important court ruling that took place, it was between (BA) the bankers Association and the financial ombudsman, this hearing was in relation to the recent issues of that time concerning people in the United Kingdom that had been wrongly sold payment protection insurance by the banks and many other large corporate companies.
  
  The ruling was of particular importance because a number of ppi claim firms had already taken it upon themselves to provide claims management services to the general British public even without knowing whether or not there would be a valid Market for such a service, many of these companies electing to charge customers upfront fees in exchange for the reclaim management services that they were offering.Image
  
  The judicial ruling was also of particular importance due to the simple facts that the banks and other corporations wanted to know whether or not there would be a huge influx of fresh ppi claims whether or not they could overturn the decision in their favour to avoid people reclaiming compensation for wrongly sold PPI.
  
  However much to the bank's dissatisfaction it was decided that all individuals in the United Kingdom that have received mis-sold protection insurance policies would indeed be due compensation due to the fact that this product has been mis-sold, this paved the way for a colossal claims epidemic that is still going strong today, with thousands of people putting a fresh compensation claims in order to get back the money that they should not have had to spend in the beginning.
  
  This hearing was the beginning of the academic because all parties knew the customers the bankers Association and the financial ombudsman that there will be a huge amount of people and a huge opportunity that they wrongfully had taken from them by unscrupulous sales techniques and misleading agreements and documentation.
  
  Since this point in time in total 25 billion GBP has been put aside by the banks and other huge corporations in the financial sector in order to repay the British mis-selling victims, hundreds of thousands of people loving mis-sold this product has successfully been able to claim compensation with the support of not only a number of private enterprise claims management companies but also with the help of the financial ombudsman, this combined effort has enabled the British people to win back billions of pounds in compensation.
  
  The judicial ruling was a remarkable decision in favour of the public, allowing justice to be done for years upon years of wrongly sold insurance, sold to people who had no use for it in a misleading fashion.
  
  One of the reasons whereby the banks found it so difficult to defend themselves was because they had no evidence to back up their claims that the product was sold in the correct manner this merits but the banks could not really defend themselves or directions putting them in a position where they simply had to repay the British public.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">In May, a very important court ruling that took place, it was between (BA) the bankers Association and the financial ombudsman, this hearing was in relation to the recent issues of that time concerning people in the United Kingdom that had been wrongly sold payment protection insurance by the banks and many other large corporate companies. <br /> <br /> The ruling was of particular importance because a number of ppi claim firms had already taken it upon themselves to provide claims management services to the general British public even without knowing whether or not there would be a valid Market for such a service, many of these companies electing to charge customers upfront fees in exchange for the reclaim management services that they were offering.Image <br /> <br /> The judicial ruling was also of particular importance due to the simple facts that the banks and other corporations wanted to know whether or not there would be a huge influx of fresh <a href="http://ppiclaims4you.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">ppi claims</a> whether or not they could overturn the decision in their favour to avoid people reclaiming compensation for wrongly sold PPI. <br /> <br /> However much to the bank's dissatisfaction it was decided that all individuals in the United Kingdom that have received mis-sold protection insurance policies would indeed be due compensation due to the fact that this product has been mis-sold, this paved the way for a colossal claims epidemic that is still going strong today, with thousands of people putting a fresh compensation claims in order to get back the money that they should not have had to spend in the beginning. <br /> <br /> This hearing was the beginning of the academic because all parties knew the customers the bankers Association and the financial ombudsman that there will be a huge amount of people and a huge opportunity that they wrongfully had taken from them by unscrupulous sales techniques and misleading agreements and documentation. <br /> <br /> Since this point in time in total 25 billion GBP has been put aside by the banks and other huge corporations in the financial sector in order to repay the British mis-selling victims, hundreds of thousands of people loving mis-sold this product has successfully been able to claim compensation with the support of not only a number of private enterprise claims management companies but also with the help of the financial ombudsman, this combined effort has enabled the British people to win back billions of pounds in compensation. <br /> <br /> The judicial ruling was a remarkable decision in favour of the public, allowing justice to be done for years upon years of wrongly sold insurance, sold to people who had no use for it in a misleading fashion. <br /> <br /> One of the reasons whereby the banks found it so difficult to defend themselves was because they had no evidence to back up their claims that the product was sold in the correct manner this merits but the banks could not really defend themselves or directions putting them in a position where they simply had to repay the British public.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top