Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy - 0 views

• 
  #1 Peacock Hjorth on 06 Oct 13

   

  If you are not mixed up in search engine optimization area, January 21st, 2007 probably held no value for you. Browsing To tell us what you think likely provides lessons you could give to your aunt. However, if you're a search engine marketer or SEO, you probably remember whilst the time January 21st that Wikipedia died. For the untrained eye, Wikipedia is precisely the exact same today as it had been six months before. But, after you take a look and get below the surface, you is able to see one difference that's had a direct effect on the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW.
  
  In the words of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' credit is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines that the web site cant or doesnt wish to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. That helped weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this really is a whole other controversy that can need to be saved for an alternative article.
  
  On each confident link the reason that Wikipedias usage of NOFOLLOW caused such a mix is because lots of people considered it as the most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia may have made. The reason that Wikipedia is becoming so common and works so well in the SERPs is that writers and site owners typically guide Wikipedia. When they do this, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. My dad learned about open in a new browser window by browsing books in the library. Every time that process occurs, Wikipedia gains a bit more recognition in the search engines. Visit seo companies orange county to study how to provide for this belief. They are telling the various search engines that while we guide a web site and may use content from it in our report, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to apply the NOFOLLOW label. Be taught new resources on this partner paper - Click here: account. It's because of this that numerous have started to view being a hypocrisy Wikipedia.
  
  Although NOFOLLOW has probably reduce the amount of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as numerous others have stated, Wikipedia may have chosen another way of fighting spam that didn't punish quality internet sites which deserve to be identified by Wikipedia.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">If you are not mixed up in search engine optimization area, January 21st, 2007 probably held no value for you. Browsing To <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/OrangeCo_SEO">tell us what you think</a> likely provides lessons you could give to your aunt. However, if you're a search engine marketer or SEO, you probably remember whilst the time January 21st that Wikipedia died. For the untrained eye, Wikipedia is precisely the exact same today as it had been six months before. But, after you take a look and get below the surface, you is able to see one difference that's had a direct effect on the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW. <br /> <br /> In the words of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' credit is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines that the web site cant or doesnt wish to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. That helped weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this really is a whole other controversy that can need to be saved for an alternative article. <br /> <br /> On each confident link the reason that Wikipedias usage of NOFOLLOW caused such a mix is because lots of people considered it as the most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia may have made. The reason that Wikipedia is becoming so common and works so well in the SERPs is that writers and site owners typically guide Wikipedia. When they do this, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. My dad learned about <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/OrangeCo_SEO">open in a new browser window</a> by browsing books in the library. Every time that process occurs, Wikipedia gains a bit more recognition in the search engines. Visit <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.orange-county-seo.com/facebook">seo companies orange county</a> to study how to provide for this belief. They are telling the various search engines that while we guide a web site and may use content from it in our report, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to apply the NOFOLLOW label. Be taught new resources on this partner paper - Click here: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.orange-county-seo.com/facebook">account</a>. It's because of this that numerous have started to view being a hypocrisy Wikipedia. <br /> <br /> Although NOFOLLOW has probably reduce the amount of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as numerous others have stated, Wikipedia may have chosen another way of fighting spam that didn't punish quality internet sites which deserve to be identified by Wikipedia.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top