AR has four components: (1) access to books, (2) provide time to read books, (3) take tests, (4) get rewards and the complete program is consistently compared to “traditional” instruction and is often (but not always) better. It is no surprise to see a program with all four components do better than one with none of them, but is this just because of the access and time dedicated to reading? Did the tests and prizes add anything?
Krashen On Bribing Students To Read | Larry Ferlazzo's Websites of the Day… - 0 views
-
-
Five out of six results were statistically insignificant.
The Future of Reading - Literacy Debate - Online, R U Really Reading? - Series - NYTime... - 0 views
-
In fact, some literacy experts say that online reading skills will help children fare better when they begin looking for digital-age jobs.
-
On the Internet, readers skate through cyberspace at will and, in effect, compose their own beginnings, middles and ends.
-
According to federal statistics, students who say they read for fun once a day score significantly higher on reading tests than those who say they never do
- ...4 more annotations...
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20▼ items per page