A Family-Friendly Policy That's Friendliest to Male Professors - The New York Times - 0 views
www.nytimes.com/...t-women-at-a-disadvantage.html
policy parental_leave economists academia lean-in womenslearningstudio
shared by Doris Reeves-Lipscomb on 14 Jul 16
- No Cached
-
They have advanced the careers of male economists, often at women’s expense
-
The central problem is that employment policies that are gender-neutral on paper may not be gender-neutral in effect.
-
Succeed within seven years and you have a job for life. Fall short, and you’re fired.
- ...5 more annotations...
-
The policies led to a 19 percentage-point rise in the probability that a male economist would earn tenure at his first job. In contrast, women’s chances of gaining tenure fell by 22 percentage points. Before the arrival of tenure extension, a little less than 30 percent of both women and men at these institutions gained tenure at their first jobs. The decline for women is therefore very large.
-
They found that men who took parental leave used the extra year to publish their research, amassing impressive publication records. But there was no parallel rise in the output of female economists.
-
ng birth is not a gender-neutral event,” recalling that during her pregnancy, “I threw up every day.” She argued, “Policies that are neutral in the eyes of a lawyer are not neutral in fact.”
-
Better policies could help economics — not to mention the sciences and other fields — look like less of a boys’ club.
-
Three female economists have shown that the tools of economics — which enable a careful assessment of incentives and constraints informed by real-world data — suggest that a more nuanced policy would lead to better outcomes. It leaves me wondering how many other policy mistakes we could avoid, if only we had more female economists.
-
informed assessment/report by Justin Wolfers, NYTimes, on how extending parental leave policies cause unintended impacts