don't virtually all progressives and Democrats argue that torture produces unreliable evidence? If it's really true (as Obama defenders claim) that the evidence we have against these detainees was obtained by torture and is therefore inadmissible in real courts, do you really think such unreliable evidence -- evidence we obtained by torture -- should be the basis for concluding that someone is so "dangerous" that they belong in prison indefinitely with no trial? If you don't trust evidence obtained by torture, why do you trust it to justify holding someone forever, with no trial, as "dangerous"?
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
1More
1More
Unified Files Third IPR Against Advanced Silicon Technologies, LLC - 1 views
1More
Unified Files for Inter Partes Review of Television Patent - 1 views
1More
Unified Filing Results in Successful Adverse Judgment against Qurio Patent - 1 views
Notary Public - 4 views
1More
What Can Be the Result of a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit? | Medical Malpractice Canada - 0 views
Why India is not developing? - 0 views
1More
Features a Patent Infringement Insurance Policy Must Have - 1 views
Fundly : Donate Spare-Cash In Support of Human Rights To End ICC-Culprit Uhuru's Sancti... - 0 views
1More
Board Institutes Unified IPR on Ruby Sands, LLC Electronic Payment Patent - 1 views
Uhuru's Organized Crime / Economy Cartels Subversion of Justice Circus : Ask Justice Ny... - 0 views
SARS nCoV2 is killing people and on top Sadist ICC-Indicted Uhuru's killing me with sys... - 0 views
Uhuru's ( @puktta ) 'my HM the Queen Elizabeth birthday- wish' 'Twitter-like' reach-out... - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
421 - 440 of 446
Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page