Group items tagged

If your suffers because of other person's careless act you have the right to fight your injury claim. Laws concerning personal injury case is applicable to all. In dealing your your there are thing to consider. These are listed below.

On September 8, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed its 55th petition for inter partes review, challenging all claims of U.S. Patent 6,442,261 as unpatentable over multiple grounds. The patent, related to identifying dropped telephone calls, had been asserted against automotive companies. A copy of the petition can be found below.

There was a time when the technology industry was the only industry that had to bother about patent litigation. Competitors and manufactures had to battle in the court room over the ownership and rights to inventions and the returns obtained from that invention. However, in the present scenario, the entire world has experienced the influence...

Data suggests an inter partes review (IPR) institution decision is a defining moment in underlying litigation. Unified examined all district court settlements involving patents subject of IPR. The data revealed parties have shifted toward earlier settlements, usually just before an expected institution decision. The movement to pre-institution settlement shows the direct effects of PTAB on District Court.

Unified Patents Inc. filed to terminate IPR2015-00874 based on a settlement with Hall Data Sync Technologies LLC. The settlement details are confidential.

On July 22, 2016, Unified filed for inter partes review of all claims 1-16 of U.S. Patent 7,454,002, owned and asserted by Sportbrain Holdings, Inc. The subject matter relates to the devices providing data via the Internet, commonly known as the Internet of things. A copy of the petition is found below.

On June 27, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted IPR on all challenged claims on a patent owned and asserted by the Acacia Research-associated American Vehicular Sciences, LLC. The IPR, IPR2016-00364, challenged 1, 8, 10, 12, 17-19, 26, 27, and 36 of the patent, U.S. 9,043,093.

Accidents do happen everywhere at any time. You've got to have an auto accident attorney.

Sudbury personal injury lawyers are adept at evaluating personal injury claims and determining what, if any, merit a lawsuit might have. He/she will discuss the specific facts of your injury and help you determine who the correct parties are that you may file your personal injury lawsuit against.

We are currently living in one of the safest periods of airplane travel in history. And even though airplane accidents are extremely rare, there is a surprisingly large amount of air traffic controller errors. From 2009 to 2010, the number of air traffic controller errors almost doubled.

The Greensboro Law Firm of Schlosser & Pritchett with highly experienced team of personal injury lawyers, criminal defense attorneys and skilled support staff share a common goal of delivering quality legal services to clients in personal injury, auto accident and criminal defense cases in Greensboro, Winston Salem, High Point Burlington and Guilford County areas.

It is better to consider all the factors while buying or selling your car. You have to be applicable with the lemon laws available in the particular state.

It is better to consider all the factors while buying or selling your car. You have to be applicable with the lemon laws available in the particular state.

The speech that Mr. President gave at White House Correspondent's Dinnershowed that he really has agood sense of humor about his Obamacare.

Visit Unified Patents and discover about secure & anti patent troll program available in San Jose, USA. We have been successful in catering specialized services to a number of establishments and patent owners.

Do you want to get patent litigation insurance at affordable prices? Your search to look for the ones would surely end up at Unified Patents. We are a leading service provider having years of experience delivering top notch solutions.

On August 19, 2016, Unified Patents Inc. filed its 50th inter partes review petition, against a patent owned and asserted by Intellectual Ventures I LLC. The IPR2016-01643 challenges claims 1-4, 6-9, and 11-17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,775,745 B1, currently being asserted in the district court.

On August 29, 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted an IPR filed by Unified Patents Inc. on a patent related to electronic payments. The patent, U.S. Patent 6,891,633, has been asserted against dozens of banking institutions. The Board adopted an initial narrow claim construction and instituted review of claims 1-18 and 21-26 of the patent.