Skip to main content

Home/ Larvata/ Group items tagged jmeter

Rss Feed Group items tagged

crazylion lee

flood-io/ruby-jmeter: A Ruby based DSL for building JMeter test plans - 0 views

  •  
    "A Ruby based DSL for building JMeter test plans"
張 旭

Open source load testing tool review 2020 - 0 views

  • Hey is a simple tool, written in Go, with good performance and the most common features you'll need to run simple static URL tests.
  • Hey supports HTTP/2, which neither Wrk nor Apachebench does
  • Apachebench is very fast, so often you will not need more than one CPU core to generate enough traffic
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • Hey has rate limiting, which can be used to run fixed-rate tests.
  • Vegeta was designed to be run on the command line; it reads from stdin a list of HTTP transactions to generate, and sends results in binary format to stdout,
  • Vegeta is a really strong tool that caters to people who want a tool to test simple, static URLs (perhaps API end points) but also want a bit more functionality.
  • Vegeta can even be used as a Golang library/package if you want to create your own load testing tool.
  • Wrk is so damn fast
  • being fast and measuring correctly is about all that Wrk does
  • k6 is scriptable in plain Javascript
  • k6 is average or better. In some categories (documentation, scripting API, command line UX) it is outstanding.
  • Jmeter is a huge beast compared to most other tools.
  • Siege is a simple tool, similar to e.g. Apachebench in that it has no scripting and is primarily used when you want to hit a single, static URL repeatedly.
  • A good way of testing the testing tools is to not test them on your code, but on some third-party thing that is sure to be very high-performing.
  • use a tool like e.g. top to keep track of Nginx CPU usage while testing. If you see just one process, and see it using close to 100% CPU, it means you could be CPU-bound on the target side.
  • If you see multiple Nginx processes but only one is using a lot of CPU, it means your load testing tool is only talking to that particular worker process.
  • Network delay is also important to take into account as it sets an upper limit on the number of requests per second you can push through.
  • If, say, the Nginx default page requires a transfer of 250 bytes to load, it means that if the servers are connected via a 100 Mbit/s link, the theoretical max RPS rate would be around 100,000,000 divided by 8 (bits per byte) divided by 250 => 100M/2000 = 50,000 RPS. Though that is a very optimistic calculation - protocol overhead will make the actual number a lot lower so in the case above I would start to get worried bandwidth was an issue if I saw I could push through max 30,000 RPS, or something like that.
  • Wrk managed to push through over 50,000 RPS and that made 8 Nginx workers on the target system consume about 600% CPU.
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20 items per page