Skip to main content

Home/ Larvata/ Group items tagged alert

Rss Feed Group items tagged

張 旭

Auto DevOps | GitLab - 0 views

  • Auto DevOps provides pre-defined CI/CD configuration which allows you to automatically detect, build, test, deploy, and monitor your applications
  • Just push your code and GitLab takes care of everything else.
  • Auto DevOps will be automatically disabled on the first pipeline failure.
  • ...78 more annotations...
  • Your project will continue to use an alternative CI/CD configuration file if one is found
  • Auto DevOps works with any Kubernetes cluster;
  • using the Docker or Kubernetes executor, with privileged mode enabled.
  • Base domain (needed for Auto Review Apps and Auto Deploy)
  • Kubernetes (needed for Auto Review Apps, Auto Deploy, and Auto Monitoring)
  • Prometheus (needed for Auto Monitoring)
  • scrape your Kubernetes cluster.
  • project level as a variable: KUBE_INGRESS_BASE_DOMAIN
  • A wildcard DNS A record matching the base domain(s) is required
  • Once set up, all requests will hit the load balancer, which in turn will route them to the Kubernetes pods that run your application(s).
  • review/ (every environment starting with review/)
  • staging
  • production
  • need to define a separate KUBE_INGRESS_BASE_DOMAIN variable for all the above based on the environment.
  • Continuous deployment to production: Enables Auto Deploy with master branch directly deployed to production.
  • Continuous deployment to production using timed incremental rollout
  • Automatic deployment to staging, manual deployment to production
  • Auto Build creates a build of the application using an existing Dockerfile or Heroku buildpacks.
  • If a project’s repository contains a Dockerfile, Auto Build will use docker build to create a Docker image.
  • Each buildpack requires certain files to be in your project’s repository for Auto Build to successfully build your application.
  • Auto Test automatically runs the appropriate tests for your application using Herokuish and Heroku buildpacks by analyzing your project to detect the language and framework.
  • Auto Code Quality uses the Code Quality image to run static analysis and other code checks on the current code.
  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST) uses the SAST Docker image to run static analysis on the current code and checks for potential security issues.
  • Dependency Scanning uses the Dependency Scanning Docker image to run analysis on the project dependencies and checks for potential security issues.
  • License Management uses the License Management Docker image to search the project dependencies for their license.
  • Vulnerability Static Analysis for containers uses Clair to run static analysis on a Docker image and checks for potential security issues.
  • Review Apps are temporary application environments based on the branch’s code so developers, designers, QA, product managers, and other reviewers can actually see and interact with code changes as part of the review process. Auto Review Apps create a Review App for each branch. Auto Review Apps will deploy your app to your Kubernetes cluster only. When no cluster is available, no deployment will occur.
  • The Review App will have a unique URL based on the project ID, the branch or tag name, and a unique number, combined with the Auto DevOps base domain.
  • Review apps are deployed using the auto-deploy-app chart with Helm, which can be customized.
  • Your apps should not be manipulated outside of Helm (using Kubernetes directly).
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) uses the popular open source tool OWASP ZAProxy to perform an analysis on the current code and checks for potential security issues.
  • Auto Browser Performance Testing utilizes the Sitespeed.io container to measure the performance of a web page.
  • add the paths to a file named .gitlab-urls.txt in the root directory, one per line.
  • After a branch or merge request is merged into the project’s default branch (usually master), Auto Deploy deploys the application to a production environment in the Kubernetes cluster, with a namespace based on the project name and unique project ID
  • Auto Deploy doesn’t include deployments to staging or canary by default, but the Auto DevOps template contains job definitions for these tasks if you want to enable them.
  • Apps are deployed using the auto-deploy-app chart with Helm.
  • For internal and private projects a GitLab Deploy Token will be automatically created, when Auto DevOps is enabled and the Auto DevOps settings are saved.
  • If the GitLab Deploy Token cannot be found, CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD is used. Note that CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD is only valid during deployment.
  • If present, DB_INITIALIZE will be run as a shell command within an application pod as a helm post-install hook.
  • a post-install hook means that if any deploy succeeds, DB_INITIALIZE will not be processed thereafter.
  • DB_MIGRATE will be run as a shell command within an application pod as a helm pre-upgrade hook.
    • 張 旭
       
      如果專案類型不同,就要去查 buildpacks 裡面如何叫用該指令,例如 laravel 的 migration
    • 張 旭
       
      如果是自己的 Dockerfile 建立起來的,看來就不用鳥 buildpacks 的作法
  • Once your application is deployed, Auto Monitoring makes it possible to monitor your application’s server and response metrics right out of the box.
  • annotate the NGINX Ingress deployment to be scraped by Prometheus using prometheus.io/scrape: "true" and prometheus.io/port: "10254"
  • If you are also using Auto Review Apps and Auto Deploy and choose to provide your own Dockerfile, make sure you expose your application to port 5000 as this is the port assumed by the default Helm chart.
  • While Auto DevOps provides great defaults to get you started, you can customize almost everything to fit your needs; from custom buildpacks, to Dockerfiles, Helm charts, or even copying the complete CI/CD configuration into your project to enable staging and canary deployments, and more.
  • If your project has a Dockerfile in the root of the project repo, Auto DevOps will build a Docker image based on the Dockerfile rather than using buildpacks.
  • Auto DevOps uses Helm to deploy your application to Kubernetes.
  • Bundled chart - If your project has a ./chart directory with a Chart.yaml file in it, Auto DevOps will detect the chart and use it instead of the default one.
  • Create a project variable AUTO_DEVOPS_CHART with the URL of a custom chart to use or create two project variables AUTO_DEVOPS_CHART_REPOSITORY with the URL of a custom chart repository and AUTO_DEVOPS_CHART with the path to the chart.
  • make use of the HELM_UPGRADE_EXTRA_ARGS environment variable to override the default values in the values.yaml file in the default Helm chart.
  • specify the use of a custom Helm chart per environment by scoping the environment variable to the desired environment.
    • 張 旭
       
      Auto DevOps 就是一套人家寫好好的傳便便的 .gitlab-ci.yml
  • Your additions will be merged with the Auto DevOps template using the behaviour described for include
  • copy and paste the contents of the Auto DevOps template into your project and edit this as needed.
  • In order to support applications that require a database, PostgreSQL is provisioned by default.
  • Set up the replica variables using a project variable and scale your application by just redeploying it!
  • You should not scale your application using Kubernetes directly.
  • Some applications need to define secret variables that are accessible by the deployed application.
  • Auto DevOps detects variables where the key starts with K8S_SECRET_ and make these prefixed variables available to the deployed application, as environment variables.
  • Auto DevOps pipelines will take your application secret variables to populate a Kubernetes secret.
  • Environment variables are generally considered immutable in a Kubernetes pod.
  • if you update an application secret without changing any code then manually create a new pipeline, you will find that any running application pods will not have the updated secrets.
  • Variables with multiline values are not currently supported
  • The normal behavior of Auto DevOps is to use Continuous Deployment, pushing automatically to the production environment every time a new pipeline is run on the default branch.
  • If STAGING_ENABLED is defined in your project (e.g., set STAGING_ENABLED to 1 as a CI/CD variable), then the application will be automatically deployed to a staging environment, and a production_manual job will be created for you when you’re ready to manually deploy to production.
  • If CANARY_ENABLED is defined in your project (e.g., set CANARY_ENABLED to 1 as a CI/CD variable) then two manual jobs will be created: canary which will deploy the application to the canary environment production_manual which is to be used by you when you’re ready to manually deploy to production.
  • If INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_MODE is set to manual in your project, then instead of the standard production job, 4 different manual jobs will be created: rollout 10% rollout 25% rollout 50% rollout 100%
  • The percentage is based on the REPLICAS variable and defines the number of pods you want to have for your deployment.
  • To start a job, click on the play icon next to the job’s name.
  • Once you get to 100%, you cannot scale down, and you’d have to roll back by redeploying the old version using the rollback button in the environment page.
  • With INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_MODE set to manual and with STAGING_ENABLED
  • not all buildpacks support Auto Test yet
  • When a project has been marked as private, GitLab’s Container Registry requires authentication when downloading containers.
  • Authentication credentials will be valid while the pipeline is running, allowing for a successful initial deployment.
  • After the pipeline completes, Kubernetes will no longer be able to access the Container Registry.
  • We strongly advise using GitLab Container Registry with Auto DevOps in order to simplify configuration and prevent any unforeseen issues.
crazylion lee

GitHub - dropbox/securitybot: Distributed alerting for the masses! - 0 views

  •  
    "Distributed alerting for the masses!"
張 旭

What's the difference between Prometheus and Zabbix? - Stack Overflow - 0 views

  • Zabbix has core written in C and webUI based on PHP
  • Zabbix stores data in RDBMS (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, sqlite) of user's choice.
  • Prometheus uses its own database embedded into backend process
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Zabbix by default uses "pull" model when a server connects to agents on each monitoring machine, agents periodically gather the info and send it to a server.
  • Prometheus prefers "pull" model when a server gather info from client machines.
  • Prometheus requires an application to be instrumented with Prometheus client library (available in different programming languages) for preparing metrics.
  • expose metrics for Prometheus (similar to "agents" for Zabbix)
  • Zabbix uses its own tcp-based communication protocol between agents and a server.
  • Prometheus uses HTTP with protocol buffers (+ text format for ease of use with curl).
  • Prometheus offers basic tool for exploring gathered data and visualizing it in simple graphs on its native server and also offers a minimal dashboard builder PromDash. But Prometheus is and is designed to be supported by modern visualizing tools like Grafana.
  • Prometheus offers solution for alerting that is separated from its core into Alertmanager application.
張 旭

Introduction to GitLab Flow | GitLab - 0 views

  • Git allows a wide variety of branching strategies and workflows.
  • not integrated with issue tracking systems
  • The biggest problem is that many long-running branches emerge that all contain part of the changes.
  • ...47 more annotations...
  • most organizations practice continuous delivery, which means that your default branch can be deployed.
  • Merging everything into the master branch and frequently deploying means you minimize the amount of unreleased code, which is in line with lean and continuous delivery best practices.
  • you can deploy to production every time you merge a feature branch.
  • deploy a new version by merging master into the production branch.
  • you can have your deployment script create a tag on each deployment.
  • to have an environment that is automatically updated to the master branch
  • commits only flow downstream, ensures that everything is tested in all environments.
  • first merge these bug fixes into master, and then cherry-pick them into the release branch.
  • Merging into master and then cherry-picking into release is called an “upstream first” policy
  • “merge request” since the final action is to merge the feature branch.
  • “pull request” since the first manual action is to pull the feature branch
  • it is common to protect the long-lived branches
  • After you merge a feature branch, you should remove it from the source control software
  • When you are ready to code, create a branch for the issue from the master branch. This branch is the place for any work related to this change.
  • A merge request is an online place to discuss the change and review the code.
  • If you open the merge request but do not assign it to anyone, it is a “Work In Progress” merge request.
  • Start the title of the merge request with “[WIP]” or “WIP:” to prevent it from being merged before it’s ready.
  • To automatically close linked issues, mention them with the words “fixes” or “closes,” for example, “fixes #14” or “closes #67.” GitLab closes these issues when the code is merged into the default branch.
  • If you have an issue that spans across multiple repositories, create an issue for each repository and link all issues to a parent issue.
  • With Git, you can use an interactive rebase (rebase -i) to squash multiple commits into one or reorder them.
  • you should never rebase commits you have pushed to a remote server.
  • Rebasing creates new commits for all your changes, which can cause confusion because the same change would have multiple identifiers.
  • if someone has already reviewed your code, rebasing makes it hard to tell what changed since the last review.
  • never rebase commits authored by other people.
  • it is a bad idea to rebase commits that you have already pushed.
  • always use the “no fast-forward” (--no-ff) strategy when you merge manually.
  • you should try to avoid merge commits in feature branches
  • people avoid merge commits by just using rebase to reorder their commits after the commits on the master branch. Using rebase prevents a merge commit when merging master into your feature branch, and it creates a neat linear history.
  • you should never rebase commits you have pushed to a remote server
  • Sometimes you can reuse recorded resolutions (rerere), but merging is better since you only have to resolve conflicts once.
  • not frequently merge master into the feature branch.
  • utilizing new code,
  • resolving merge conflicts
  • updating long-running branches.
  • just cherry-picking a commit.
  • If your feature branch has a merge conflict, creating a merge commit is a standard way of solving this.
  • keep your feature branches short-lived.
  • split your features into smaller units of work
  • you should try to prevent merge commits, but not eliminate them.
  • Your codebase should be clean, but your history should represent what actually happened.
  • Splitting up work into individual commits provides context for developers looking at your code later.
  • push your feature branch frequently, even when it is not yet ready for review.
  • Commit often and push frequently
  • A commit message should reflect your intention, not just the contents of the commit.
  • Testing before merging
  • When using GitLab flow, developers create their branches from this master branch, so it is essential that it never breaks. Therefore, each merge request must be tested before it is accepted.
  • When creating a feature branch, always branch from an up-to-date master
  •  
    "Git allows a wide variety of branching strategies and workflows."
張 旭

SweetAlert - 0 views

  •  
    "Delete"
張 旭

What is DevOps? | Atlassian - 0 views

  • DevOps is a set of practices that automates the processes between software development and IT teams, in order that they can build, test, and release software faster and more reliably.
  • increased trust, faster software releases, ability to solve critical issues quickly, and better manage unplanned work.
  • bringing together the best of software development and IT operations.
  • ...39 more annotations...
  • DevOps is a culture, a movement, a philosophy.
  • a firm handshake between development and operations
  • DevOps isn’t magic, and transformations don’t happen overnight.
  • Infrastructure as code
  • Culture is the #1 success factor in DevOps.
  • Building a culture of shared responsibility, transparency and faster feedback is the foundation of every high performing DevOps team.
  •  'not our problem' mentality
  • DevOps is that change in mindset of looking at the development process holistically and breaking down the barrier between Dev and Ops.
  • Speed is everything.
  • Lack of automated test and review cycles block the release to production and poor incident response time kills velocity and team confidence
  • Open communication helps Dev and Ops teams swarm on issues, fix incidents, and unblock the release pipeline faster.
  • Unplanned work is a reality that every team faces–a reality that most often impacts team productivity.
  • “cross-functional collaboration.”
  • All the tooling and automation in the world are useless if they aren’t accompanied by a genuine desire on the part of development and IT/Ops professionals to work together.
  • DevOps doesn’t solve tooling problems. It solves human problems.
  • Forming project- or product-oriented teams to replace function-based teams is a step in the right direction.
  • sharing a common goal and having a plan to reach it together
  • join sprint planning sessions, daily stand-ups, and sprint demos.
  • DevOps culture across every department
  • open channels of communication, and talk regularly
  • DevOps isn’t one team’s job. It’s everyone’s job.
  • automation eliminates repetitive manual work, yields repeatable processes, and creates reliable systems.
  • Build, test, deploy, and provisioning automation
  • continuous delivery: the practice of running each code change through a gauntlet of automated tests, often facilitated by cloud-based infrastructure, then packaging up successful builds and promoting them up toward production using automated deploys.
  • automated deploys alert IT/Ops to server “drift” between environments, which reduces or eliminates surprises when it’s time to release.
  • “configuration as code.”
  • when DevOps uses automated deploys to send thoroughly tested code to identically provisioned environments, “Works on my machine!” becomes irrelevant.
  • A DevOps mindset sees opportunities for continuous improvement everywhere.
  • regular retrospectives
  • A/B testing
  • failure is inevitable. So you might as well set up your team to absorb it, recover, and learn from it (some call this “being anti-fragile”).
  • Postmortems focus on where processes fell down and how to strengthen them – not on which team member f'ed up the code.
  • Our engineers are responsible for QA, writing, and running their own tests to get the software out to customers.
  • How long did it take to go from development to deployment? 
  • How long does it take to recover after a system failure?
  • service level agreements (SLAs)
  • Devops isn't any single person's job. It's everyone's job.
  • DevOps is big on the idea that the same people who build an application should be involved in shipping and running it.
  • developers and operators pair with each other in each phase of the application’s lifecycle.
張 旭

Full Cycle Developers at Netflix - Operate What You Build - 1 views

  • Researching issues felt like bouncing a rubber ball between teams, hard to catch the root cause and harder yet to stop from bouncing between one another.
  • In the past, Edge Engineering had ops-focused teams and SRE specialists who owned the deploy+operate+support parts of the software life cycle
  • hearing about those problems second-hand
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • devs could push code themselves when needed, and also were responsible for off-hours production issues and support requests
  • What were we trying to accomplish and why weren’t we being successful?
  • These specialized roles create efficiencies within each segment while potentially creating inefficiencies across the entire life cycle.
  • Grouping differing specialists together into one team can reduce silos, but having different people do each role adds communication overhead, introduces bottlenecks, and inhibits the effectiveness of feedback loops.
  • devops principles
  • develops a system also be responsible for operating and supporting that system
  • Each development team owns deployment issues, performance bugs, capacity planning, alerting gaps, partner support, and so on.
  • Those centralized teams act as force multipliers by turning their specialized knowledge into reusable building blocks.
  • Communication and alignment are the keys to success.
  • Full cycle developers are expected to be knowledgeable and effective in all areas of the software life cycle.
  • ramping up on areas they haven’t focused on before
  • We run dev bootcamps and other forms of ongoing training to impart this knowledge and build up these skills
  • “how can I automate what is needed to operate this system?”
  • “what self-service tool will enable my partners to answer their questions without needing me to be involved?”
  • A full cycle developer thinks and acts like an SWE, SDET, and SRE. At times they create software that solves business problems, at other times they write test cases for that, and still other times they automate operational aspects of that system.
  • the need for continuous delivery pipelines, monitoring/observability, and so on.
  • Tooling and automation help to scale expertise, but no tool will solve every problem in the developer productivity and operations space
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page