Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy - 0 views

• 
  #1 Schneider Conley on 14 Oct 13

   

  If you're not involved in the search engine optimization group, January 21st, 2007 probably held no value for you. Nevertheless, if you are a search engine marketer or SEO, you probably remember January 21st whilst the time that Wikipedia died. Get further on our favorite partner URL by clicking tampa seo. For the inexperienced eye, Wikipedia is strictly the exact same today as it had been six months ago. But, once you dig below the top and take a look, you can see one difference that has had a direct effect around the world of internet search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW.
  
  In the words of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' characteristic is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines the web site cant or doesnt wish to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. Discover further on our affiliated web resource by clicking local splash reviews. This served website owners lessen comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this really is a whole other conflict that'll need to be preserved for another report.
  
  On each confident link the reason why that Wikipedias use of NOFOLLOW caused a lot of people viewed it as one of the most hypocritical decision that Wikipedia could have made such a stir is. Be taught more on tampa seo company by browsing our riveting paper. The reason that Wikipedia is becoming so common and performs so well in the SERPs is that bloggers and web site owners normally guide Wikipedia. When they do that, they give a link back to Wikipedia. Each and every time that this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a little more recognition within the search engines. They're showing the search engines that even though we guide a site and may use content from it within our article, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to implement the draw. It is for this reason that many have started to view Wikipedia being a hypocrisy.
  
  Wikipedia may have chosen a different method for fighting spam that didn't punish quality internet sites which deserve to be identified by Wikipedia, even though NOFOLLOW has probably reduce the amount of spam Wikipedia has to fight, but as numerous others have mentioned.Tampa SEO Crushers
  550 North Reo St
  Suite #300
  Tampa, Fl 33609

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">If you're not involved in the search engine optimization group, January 21st, 2007 probably held no value for you. Nevertheless, if you are a search engine marketer or SEO, you probably remember January 21st whilst the time that Wikipedia died. Get further on our favorite partner URL by clicking <a href="http://www.tampaseocrushers.com/" rel="nofollow">tampa seo</a>. For the inexperienced eye, Wikipedia is strictly the exact same today as it had been six months ago. But, once you dig below the top and take a look, you can see one difference that has had a direct effect around the world of internet search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW. <br /> <br /> In the words of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' characteristic is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines the web site cant or doesnt wish to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. Discover further on our affiliated web resource by clicking <a href="https://plus.google.com/112048142919273498288/about" rel="nofollow">local splash reviews</a>. This served website owners lessen comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this really is a whole other conflict that'll need to be preserved for another report. <br /> <br /> On each confident link the reason why that Wikipedias use of NOFOLLOW caused a lot of people viewed it as one of the most hypocritical decision that Wikipedia could have made such a stir is. Be taught more on <a href="https://plus.google.com/112048142919273498288/about" rel="nofollow">tampa seo company</a> by browsing our riveting paper. The reason that Wikipedia is becoming so common and performs so well in the SERPs is that bloggers and web site owners normally guide Wikipedia. When they do that, they give a link back to Wikipedia. Each and every time that this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a little more recognition within the search engines. They're showing the search engines that even though we guide a site and may use content from it within our article, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to implement the draw. It is for this reason that many have started to view Wikipedia being a hypocrisy. <br /> <br /> Wikipedia may have chosen a different method for fighting spam that didn't punish quality internet sites which deserve to be identified by Wikipedia, even though NOFOLLOW has probably reduce the amount of spam Wikipedia has to fight, but as numerous others have mentioned.Tampa SEO Crushers <br /> 550 North Reo St <br /> Suite #300 <br /> Tampa, Fl 33609</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top