Skip to main content

Home/ javascript/ Group items tagged delete

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Javier Neira

Perfection kills » Understanding delete - 3 views

  • All because it’s not possible to delete variables in Javascript. At least not when declared in such way.
  • It’s almost as if Firebug follows some other rules of deletion. It is Firebug that has led Stoyan astray! So what is really going on here?
  • we need to understand how delete operator works in Javascript: what exactly can and cannot be deleted and why.
  • ...35 more annotations...
  • var o = { x: 1 }; delete o.x; // true o.x; // undefined
  • var x = 1; delete x; // false x; // 1
  • function x(){} delete x; // false typeof x; // "function"
  • Note that delete only returns false when a property can not be deleted.
  • variable instantiation and property attributes
  • Global code, Function code and Eval code.
  • When a source text is treated as a Program, it is executed in a global scope, and is considered a Global code.
  • Anything that’s executed directly within a function is, quite obviously, considered a Function code. In browsers, content of event attributes (e.g. <p onclick="...">) is usually parsed and treated as a Function code.
  • text that’s supplied to a built-in eval function is parsed as Eval code. We will soon see why this type is special.
  • And now that we know the difference between property assignment and variable declaration — latter one sets DontDelete, whereas former one doesn’t — it should be clear why undeclared assignment creates a deletable property:
  • As you can see, execution contexts can logically form a stack. First there might be Global code with its own execution context; that code might call a function, with its own execution context; that function could call another function, and so on and so forth. Even if function is calling itself recursively, a new execition context is being entered with every invocation.
  • Every execution context has a so-called Variable Object associated with it. Similarly to execution context, Variable object is an abstract entity, a mechanism to describe variable instantiation. Now, the interesing part is that variables and functions declared in a source text are actually added as properties of this Variable object.
  • When control enters execution context for Global code, a Global object is used as a Variable object. This is precisely why variables or functions declared globally become properties of a Global object:
  • The behavior is actually very similar: they become properties of Variable object. The only difference is that when in Function code, a Variable object is not a Global object, but a so-called Activation object. Activation object is created every time execution context for Function code is entered.
  • and a special Arguments object (under arguments name). Note that Activation object is an internal mechanism and is never really accessible by program code.
  • within Eval code are created as properties of calling context’s Variable object. Eval code simply uses Variable object of the execution context that it’s being called within:
  • Execution context When ECMAScript code executes, it always happens within certain execution context.
  • When declared variables and functions become properties of a Variable object — either Activation object (for Function code), or Global object (for Global code), these properties are created with DontDelete attribute. However, any explicit (or implicit) property assignment creates property without DontDelete attribute. And this is essentialy why we can delete some properties, but not others:
  • Special arguments variable (or, as we know now, a property of Activation object) has DontDelete. length property of any function instance has DontDelete as well:
  • As you might remember, undeclared assignment creates a property on a global object.
  • Now that it’s clear what happens with variables (they become properties), the only remaining concept to understand is property attributes. Every property can have zero or more attributes from the following set — ReadOnly, DontEnum, DontDelete and Internal. These attributes serve as sort of flags — an attribute can either exist on a property or not. For the purposes of today’s discussion, we are only interested in DontDelete.
  • Variables declared within Eval code are actually created as properties without DontDelete:
  • This interesting eval behavior, coupled with another aspect of ECMAScript can technically allow us to delete non-deletable properties. The thing about function declarations is that they can overwrite same-named variables in the same execution context:
  • Note how function declaration takes precedence and overwrites same-named variable (or, in other words, same property of Variable object). This is because function declarations are instantiated after variable declarations, and are allowed to overwrite them
  • If we declare function via eval, that function should also replace that property’s attributes with its own. And since variables declared from within eval create properties without DontDelete, instantiating this new function should essentially remove existing DontDelete attribute from the property in question, making that property deletable (and of course changing its value to reference newly created function).
  • Unfortunately, this kind of spoofing doesn’t work in any implementation I tried. I might be missing something here, or this behavior might simply be too obscure for implementors to pay attention to
  • this.x = 1; delete x; // TypeError: Object doesn't support this action
  • var x = 1; delete this.x; // TypeError: Cannot delete 'this.x'
  • It’s as if variable declarations in Global code do not create properties on Global object in IE.
  • Not only is there an error, but created property appears to have DontDelete set on it, which of course it shouldn’t have:
  • “The global variable object is implemented as a JScript object, and the global object is implemented by the host.
  • Note how this and window seem to reference same object (if we can believe === operator), but Variable object (the one on which function is declared) is different from whatever this references.
  • delete doesn’t differentiate between variables and properties (in fact, for delete, those are all References) and really only cares about DontDelete attribute (and property existence).
  • The moral of the story is to never trust host objects.
  • Few restrictions are being introduced. SyntaxError is now thrown when expression in delete operator is a direct reference to a variable, function argument or function identifier. In addition, if property has internal [[Configurable]] == false, a TypeError is thrown:
Julian Knight

mrclay.org » Blog Archive » MyPage Bookmarklet - 0 views

  •  
    Bookmarklet that lets you delete and change elements on page beforeprinting. Also does a fast print preview. Very powerful.
  •  
    Bookmarklet that lets you delete and change elements on page before printing. Also does a fast print preview. Very powerful.
Javier Neira

Why REST ? | /var/log/mind - 0 views

  • ‘ls’ or ‘List Directory’
  • ‘cd’or ‘Change Directory’
  • ‘put’ or ‘Upload’
  • ...26 more annotations...
  • you soon realise that every file and directory is uniquely addressable by its fully qualified path (either absolute or relative) and you can refer to each file and directory by its path. You are also aware that a valid path will uniquely resolve to only one directory or file.
  • the server allows you to retrieve the list of subdirectories and files within your current directory. It always shows you the current state of that directory.
  • following elements
  • A shared understanding of where the files will be uploaded, how they will be uniquely named, their specific file extensions (optionally) and the specific format of the file eg.
  • daemon process on the central office computer (the FTP server) which regularly scans the directory, parses each file as it comes it, does the relevant processing on it, and generates the appropriate result files and places them in the appropriate directories using the shared understanding of the directory structure and the file naming convention to communicate back the results of the processing.
  • RPC allowed you to invoke remote procedures by supporting an ability to pass messages which included the message name and the values for all the parameters necessary to be supplied to the message. Unlike FTP which was meant to do data transfer across a network, RPC was geared to do things remotely.
  • FTP required understanding of very few basic verbs (ls, cd, get, put). Thus the training required to understand FTP semantics was far less than that for RPC. This was partially due to the fact that RPC had a programmatic interface.
  • Moreover each time, new procedures were added or parameters added, these required programmatic changes
  • HTTP protoco
  • Unlike FTP and email, this required the authors to understand a new language, but used a simple markup syntax to keep the learning curve to the minimum
  • get/view/download/save a document
  • Along with RPC, these were essentially different technical manifestations of Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) principles.
  • Many services were usually expected to “do something” though quite often some services would simply return the requested data. Usually but not necessarily the services were identified by using ‘verbs’.
  • allow us to use the web to ‘do something’
  • Resource and media types as the basic units
  • Unique resource identifiers
  • Each resource has often one default manually readable representation
  • Each resource representation optionally includes contextually relevant hyperlinks to other resources
  • REST encourages a uniform interface
  • GET, PUT, POST and DELETE
  • Default Rendering
  • a default HTML rendering capability
  • Aspects such as non maintenance of conversational state, greatly increase the scalability of REST applications even if they do incur a minor cost in efficiency (which can be due to repeated redundant communication of data elements, or additional processing requirements due to preclusion of conversation state).
  • is much easier to understand from a data perspective than an invoice processor API.
  • However the simpler, cleaner and minimalistic abstractions often are far more important than feature richness. A point I would want to make in favour of REST even as I admit that conventional SOA technologies are far more feature rich than REST.
  • REST encourages you to view and model your architecture as a set of resources rather than services.
Javier Neira

InfoQ: ECMAScript 5 released - 1 views

  • The introduction of strict mode aims to avoid common coding problems in ECMAScript applications. This is achieved with the presence of a lone string literal in a unit (script or function): "use strict;"
  • for either the entire script (if at the top of the script) or for a single function (if the first part of a function).
  • var i=3 is needed
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • and introducing new variables through eval cannot occu
  • delete cannot be used against arguments, functions or variables or other properties with the configurable flag set to false
  • with statements, often a source of errors, are no longer used and considered syntax errors
  • Functions can no longer have duplicate arguments with the same name Objects can no longer have duplicate properties with the same name
  • Access to the global object becomes a runtime error
  • A new JSON object with parse and stringify to support efficient generation of JSON data; like eval but without the security implications of being able to reduce code
  • Array now has standard functions, such as indexOf(), map(), filter(), and reduce()
  • Object now has seal()
  • and freeze()
  • Object.getPrototypeof() returns the prototype of the given object
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page