Group items tagged

Overall: I am not exactly sure as to the overall purpose of the website is. The information that I used for the webquest was chemistry related whereas most of the website has youtube videos associated to many different things. It is a blog so it is most likely intended for a broad audience. I am not impressed with any aspect of the site. Content: The content of the website is not clear in any way shape or form. There is scattered information about multiple subjects throughout the website (blog). There is little information that is useful. Most of what is given is very recreational. Design: The design of this website is also very poor along with the content. It is very hard to navigate. There is no official table of contents. There is a list of archives, but not a list of relative topics. There are no links to relative topics, and there is not anything to help you navigate through the site either. Very poorly designed.

Hailey Dudley 10/15/12 Overview: This site had many important informational purposes for people who are trying to learn more about Mount Rushmore. The purpose of this site was to enlighten students on the history of Mount Rushmore through a series of interactive flashcards. This website was designed for children ranging from 3rd grade to 8th grade who want to further their knowledge of Mount Rushmore. The information on this site is really good; however there are no available resources to continue the informational search on Mount Rushmore. My impression of this site was that it included really strong information on the subject but there was really no way of furthering your learning once you were done with the flashcards. Content: The content on this site had both good and bad aspects about it. At first look, the website was very clear on who it was intended for, as well as what was to be expected to learn from the site. This site was very unclear on who the information providers were. It did not state an author or the sponsor of the site. The informational currency and ways to further information was very poor as well. There was no way to find the latest revision date and there was no links to other sites. However, the information quality of this site was excellent. It was very organized and the information was valid to the subject. Design: The design of this webpage was decent. The homepage was able to download with great speed and the home page was very appealing to the eye. However, there was no information of the sponsor or the copyright date. Because of this, the site had no available date of last revision. This site also had no way of furthering education of Mount Rushmore because there were no other links. What was really exceptional on this site was the ease of navigation and the content that was presented.