Overview: The target audience for this site was primarily for any student at the high school elvel or above because the subject involved writing reserach papers. Content: Content is a little less informal and unorganized. The topic of the site is clear from the title but gets a little murky as you scroll down. The site goes from information about writing research papers to a blog about writing in general. There is no table of contents either. The info. about how to write a research paper seemed okay to me as far as I could tell. There were quite a few commercial ads and links to other sites that somewhat pertained to the website. The latest revision was not found Design: Page downloaded efficiently, although the homepage was not that appealing. There was no multimedia on this site. I think that this would be a last resort stie if someon were truly tryign to fnd info. about writing research papers.

Overview: This website came across as very decorative and bright. It was definitely eye appealing. There were multiple images supporting the content that the website was endorsing. First impressions for this website seemed like a good choice for young kids with a hands-on desire to learn. Content:First looks were good. The site was very appealing for its age ground of younger kids. I had trouble finding the author, but I found the sponsor. I couldn't find the last revision date but links to other sites were working . The information as far as I could see was accurate. The links were relevant to the information provided on the site. Design: Hoempage downloads efficiently. Sponsor is not clearly identified. There is a table of contents for this site. The multimedia is very present. The date of last revision is not metinoed though.

Overview: This website was very visual and very organized. This website was good for educational purposes at the high school level. There were many different subjects with interactive games involved. Content: Each subject that this website offered had alot of information in it. There was a wide range of topics under each subject which helped the viewer get a better understanding. THe content of the site was clear and obvious. All of the information for the providers of the website was easy to find. I couldn't find the lates revision date, but other than that, the information quality was accurate based off of my knowledge. There were few links to other sites. Design:Everything downloaded efficiently. The hompage was very organized. The copyright date was obvious. Navigation was easy and clear cut, it was easy to move around the site. There was alot of interactive games that consituted as multimedia. This website had plenty of useful info. that made the site worth visiting

Overview: This site was very informational. THere was plenty of instructional, educational tools invovledin this website. My overall impression was what one would have of NASA n general; awe. Content: This site was very good at backing up it's information and as far as I could tell, the information was all accurate. The author,sponsor, and contact person were provided. There were no comercial adds and all of the links directly pertained to the information on the site. Design: The page downloads fine. The layout and decorum of the site was very fitting for NASA> There was alot of links and information, but it was not cluttered. Navigatino around the site was clear cut and simple. There was alot of multimedia on the site that added to it's depth.