Skip to main content

Home/ IT100_50/2010 Reader Group/ Group items tagged I

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Gina Di Vito

Scan This Book! - New York Times - 0 views

  • Indeed, the explosive rise of the Web, going from nothing to everything in one decade, has encouraged us to believe in the impossible again. Might the long-heralded great library of all knowledge really be within our grasp?
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Using the internet, Google hopes to make a huge library with much knowledge available.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Guys you have to redirect these comments to the Discussion Group.
  • The idea is to seed the bookless developing world with easily available texts.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Books would be rendered essential useless, as everything one would ever need to look up or know would be available online.
    • Gina Di Vito
       
      This is why I think libraries and books are becoming more useless to the people of this world every day.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Guys you have to redirect these comments to the Discussion Group.
  • When books are digitized, reading becomes a community activity. Bookmarks can be shared with fellow readers. Marginalia can be broadcast. Bibliographies swapped. You might get an alert that your friend Carl has annotated a favorite book of yours.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Knowledge about the books would now be available to everyone. People could communicate and notify one another about the books.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Guys you have to redirect these comments to the Discussion Group.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • There are dozens of excellent reasons that books should quickly be made part of the emerging Web. But so far they have not been, at least not in great numbers. And there is only one reason: the hegemony of the copy.
  • A luckier 10 percent are still in print.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Only 10% of remaining books are still being printed. The compaines who publish the books do not find it profitable anymore to bother physically publishing.
    • eazy ez
       
      Yeah thats true. Its amazing that only 10% are only being printed know, it still seems like there are alot! I couldnt imagine when everything was being printed.
  • Two points outraged them: the virtual copy of the book that sat on Google's indexing server and Google's assumption that it could scan first and ask questions later. On both counts the authors and publishers accused Google of blatant copyright infringement.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Many people believed that Google was committing copyright infringement. With the internet now though, many movies, TV shows and other things are available for download. Copyright infringement has almost become a thing of the past.
  • The Chinese scanning factories, which operate under their own, looser intellectual-property assumptions, will keep churning out digital books. And as scanning technology becomes faster, better and cheaper, fans may do what they did to music and simply digitize their own libraries.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Scanning technology will continue to get faster, and any legal lawsuit against Google might not be resolved before all books and anything in print are scanned to the internet.
  • In the clash between the conventions of the book and the protocols of the screen, the screen will prevail. On this screen, now visible to one billion people on earth, the technology of search will transform isolated books into the universal library of all human knowledge.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      The strength and rapid, constant growth of the internet will be too much in the end for anyone to fight to keep books around. All printed items will end up on the internet sooner or later.
Bobby Calloway

Reading and the Web - Texts Without Context - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • “Who owns the words?” Mr. Shields asks in a passage that is itself an unacknowledged reworking of remarks by the cyberpunk author William Gibson. “Who owns the music and the rest of our culture? We do — all of us — though not all of us know it yet. Reality cannot be copyrighted.”
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Many things are available for use or download on the internet, copyrighting is almost completely pointless.
    • Gina Di Vito
       
      I agree, why copyright something when you can easily get the original?
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Guys you have to redirect these comments to the Discussion Group.
  • At the same time it’s clear that technology and the mechanisms of the Web have been accelerating certain trends already percolating through our culture — including the blurring of news and entertainment, a growing polarization in national politics, a deconstructionist view of literature (which emphasizes a critic’s or reader’s interpretation of a text, rather than the text’s actual content),
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Technology and new internet sites are now used by many companies. Twitter is common for people to follow what a certain company, television station, politician, etc. are doing at the current time. Twitter and other websites also allow people to see what the stated people will be doing in the coming future.
    • Christina Muscianesi
       
      It is also a way for a company to keep its customers and followers involved in the day to day activities of the company as well as what types of projects it is involved with... Very useful in professions like PR
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Guys you have to redirect these comments to the Discussion Group.
  • TODAY’S TECHNOLOGY has bestowed miracles of access and convenience upon millions of people, and it’s also proven to be a vital new means of communication. Twitter has been used by Iranian dissidents; text messaging and social networking Web sites have been used to help coordinate humanitarian aid in Haiti; YouTube has been used by professors to teach math and chemistry.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Technology of today is being used in many ways not used before. People of all kinds can use Twitter, YouTube and other websites to teach, plan events, and do other things.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Gina you need to redirect your comments you place in the reader group to the discussion group.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • As reading shifts “from the private page to the communal screen,”
    • Mike Sanders
       
      Readings are now not just in front of one person, but available to any person in front of a computer screen.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Gina you need to redirect your comments you place in the reader group to the discussion group.
    • Bobby Calloway
       
      And yet people but newspapers. I guess its for the cupons
  • It’s no longer just hip-hop sampling that rules in youth culture, but also jukebox musicals like “Jersey Boys” and “Rock of Ages,” and works like “The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen,” which features characters drawn from a host of classic adventures. Fan fiction and fan edits are thriving, as are karaoke contests, video games like Guitar Hero, and YouTube mash-ups of music and movie, television and visual images. These recyclings and post-modern experiments run the gamut in quality. Some, like Zachary Mason’s “Lost Books of the Odyssey,” are beautifully rendered works of art in their own right. Some, like J. J. Abram’s 2009 “Star Trek” film and Amy Heckerling’s 1995 “Clueless” (based on Jane Austen’s “Emma”) are inspired reinventions of classics. Some fan-made videos are extremely clever and inventive, and some, like a 3-D video version of Picasso’s “Guernica” posted on YouTube, are intriguing works that raise important and unsettling questions about art and appropriation.
    • Mike Sanders
       
      The internet is now allowing for people to get involved in past popular things, and many people now do remakes of classic pop culture items.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Gina you need to redirect your comments you place in the reader group to the discussion group.
  • Even some outspoken cheerleaders of Internet technology have begun to grapple with some of its more vexing side effects.
  • WORRYING ABOUT the public’s growing attention deficit disorder and susceptibility to information overload, of course, is hardly new. It’s been 25 years since Neil Postman warned in “Amusing Ourselves to Death” that trivia and the entertainment values promoted by television were creating distractions that threatened to subvert public discourse, and more than a decade since writers like James Gleick (“Faster”) and David Shenk (“Data Smog”) described a culture addicted to speed, drowning in data and overstimulated to the point where only sensationalism and willful hyperbole grab people’s attention.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Gina you need to redirect your comments you place in the reader group to the discussion group.
  • Although new media can help build big TV audiences for events like the Super Bowl, it also tends to make people treat those events as fodder for digital chatter.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Gina you need to redirect your comments you place in the reader group to the discussion group.
  • , self-dramatizing blogs and carefully tended Facebook and MySpace pages becoming almost de rigeur.
  • Mr. Johnson added that the book’s migration to the digital realm will turn the solitary act of reading — “a direct exchange between author and reader” — into something far more social and suggested that as online chatter
  • “What we are engaged in — like birds of prey looking for their next meal — is a process of swooping around with an eye out for certain kinds of information.”
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page