Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ istr511
6More

eCornell: Course Home - 0 views

  • This course was produced in partnership with Cornell University.
  • The first secret of phenomenal customer service
    • bdashew
       
      Make sure you check this page out.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • In this module
    • bdashew
       
      This is the first module.
    • bdashew
       
      This is a page you need to read if you are interested in customer service.
4More

Guided Tour of Diigo - 0 views

shared by bdashew on 04 Dec 07 - Cached
1More

Mindomo - Web-based mind mapping software - 0 views

  •  
    Looks interesting ... still need to give it a try.
39More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/Module4a - 0 views

  • OD specialist
    • drleftwich
       
      What does OD stand for?
  • I am an instructional design practioner, but my title is 'learning designer.' The variety of positions, titles, organizations, and industries are what make defining the field and comparing jobs so difficult
    • drleftwich
       
      Interesting Brian... Can you think of any titles that are different in different fields, but basically mean the same thing?
  • Inventing ways to teach through electronic games, goys and life forms
    • drleftwich
       
      Is this a job or a role for a particular job?
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • But according to Dolezalek, salary averages for those with bachelor's and master's degrees went up, though those with Ph.D.'s tended to earn less than those with "professinal" degrees like an MBA (Dolezalek, 2005, p. 16).
    • drleftwich
       
      This is an interesting note. Many professors I know say that a Ph.D. in HPT is worthless - any thoughts on this? They say it doesn't do anything for you that a masters in HPT can't do for you.
    • cbruncli
       
      Who has heard in the corporate world having a Ph.D in Business Administration?
    • bdashew
       
      I don't know that any degree could be considered useless. Even if it doesn't tell you anything you don't already know, it still helps to promote the idea that you are a an expert. Especially if one is working within universities (as I do), higher ed degrees really helps to demonstrate expertise.
  • Brian, great job in searching beyond the surface and making a comparison as to who is putting out the information. Salaries would differ in the various sectors of the IT field
    • drleftwich
       
      Excellent point! Brian - I award you one point for this!
  • I wonder -- is there a correlation between geographical location and industry? Will all instructional designers on the west coast, regardless of industry, be making more money than those in the Southwest? Another question
    • drleftwich
       
      I'm assuming that this would correlate with cost of living?
  • The gov't is realizing effective training is essetial and, mostly, cannot be built by department employees. Even if they could it is a burden on primary job responsibilites
    • drleftwich
       
      This is very interesting - should we outsource everything that we're not experts in? By outsourcing, don't we need to communicate with these individuals? Is anything lost by doing all this outsourcing?
    • cbruncli
       
      No, we do not need to outsource everything but it does relieve a burden. I liked developing training as it helped me learn more on the subject but it did take me away from my duties. The Coast Guard is a small service so we have a primary duty and many collaterals we are responsible for. Not only was a Marine Inspector and Investigtor, I was the CFC Campaign Coordinator, Education Service Officer, Leadership Committee Chairperson, Visiting Ships Liason, Assistant Security Officer, and whatever else they gave me. So, if they could outsource some standard ESO training instead of every ESO in the CG building it from scratch, I'm all for it.
  • the stronger and broader your knowledge of "hard" technologies the better chance of getting hired. This is due in part to businesses desire to cut training costs, yet cover a large number of employees and the most effective way to do that is Internet, CD-Rom, etc., the "hard" technologies
    • drleftwich
       
      What about knowledge of "soft" technologies? It seems that those who come up with creative solutions, or those able to communicate with multiple groups to design the most effective instruction.
  • This is exactly what I've been finding, Teresa. I've been looking around the past few months, and have found several job postings for "instructional designer" that value, above anything else, experience and/or training using authoring tools
    • drleftwich
       
      This seems true for the more entry-level instructional designers. Would you say that the technology knowledge is more valued than knowledge of instructional design principles? What would yield more effective instruction? Why would companies be so interested in technology skills?
  • competencies I found were:
    • drleftwich
       
      By the way, excellent post Sarah = put 1 point on the weekly participation from me.
  • so I can be on the track of getting out of the k-12 setting and into the business/industry setting
    • drleftwich
       
      Is this where you want to move to Teresa? I know many K-12 focused people that participate in such organizations as well...
  • The subscriptions include PerformanceImprovement (ISPI), T+D (ASTD), and Techtrends (AECT) magazines. I cited some works from TechTrends. I got the most use out of my AECT membership because it offers free online books including the AECT Handbook.
    • drleftwich
       
      Just FYI, as an IU Distance Education Student, you have access to all these journals. http://www.libraries.iub.edu/index.php?pageId=4415
  • Dr. Molenda did not sound too enthused about ASTD and its new certification process but a student, Mark, is retaining membership in ASTD. As for IBSTIPI, it sounds like an intersesting organization and Mark meantioned another organization and did not know its name, I assume it is this
    • drleftwich
       
      Note that IU will soon be starting up a certificate program with ISPI - an HPT focus for Instructional Designers - it should be a really impressive program!
    • cbruncli
       
      Interesting, I did not know that, thanks.
  • Sounds like required class material to me........................ Doug
    • drleftwich
       
      This is an interesting concept - I like it as a course requirement - perhaps it's more beneficial than a textbook.
    • lyplank
       
      Excellent summary of factors affecting salary. As we are both in education, I imagine you are as frustrated as I that education is what I would call underpaid. Also, great reference to Reiser above. 1 point to Sarah from Lori
    • lyplank
       
      Teresa ... great summary of factors affecting salary. 1 point from Lori
    • drleftwich
       
      Most industry instructional designers find that ISPI is the most useful organization.
    • lyplank
       
      Great point Pat ... this caused me to look into salaries for different fields a bit. I found some interesting differences in salaries for Masters prepared individuals. 1 point from Lori
    • bdashew
       
      This comment could really go anywhere... Teresa and Sarah were among the first to participate this week and they did an EXCELLENT job of summarazing the key points for this week. It really set the stage for the rest of our discussion and allowed us--as a class--to focus on critical issues behind the content. Sarah 1 pt. from Brian Teresa 1 pt. from Brian
    • bdashew
       
      Pat -- excellent application of the course content to your own experiences. 1 pt. from Brian
    • lyplank
       
      Chris ... great point about the need for professionals to do the ISD work. Sometimes multi-tasking is NOT the thing to do. 1 point from Lori
4More

Group istr511's best bookmarks - 0 views

  • Who has heard in the corporate world having a Ph.D in Business Administration?
    • drleftwich
       
      Chris, I know that you can get Ph.D. with an emphasis in Business in many different fields - there are many varieties. For example, a PhD in HPT focuses on a different aspect, whereas a PhD in Organizational Psychology would look at how businesses run. You can always put a certain spin on any principle.
  • 3 No
    • drleftwich
       
      Great point Chris! 1 point for you response and critical thought here regarding outsourcing.
4More

r511 » module3d - 0 views

    • lyplank
       
      Great notes about the Lancasterian system. I'd studied a bit about this in a prior class... great reminder. 1 point to Sarah from Lori
    • lyplank
       
      Great points in getting the discussion started. 1 point to Teresa from Lori
    • bdashew
       
      For bringing her own perspective. That's what makes this course such a great experience--knowing that people are bringing their own professional experiences and it's greatly appreciated. 1 pt.
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • bdashew
       
      Sarah, all of your explanations this week were great! Incredibly helpful and much appreciated. 1 pt. from Brian
1More

Indiana University on iTunes U - 0 views

shared by drleftwich on 25 Jul 07 - Cached
  •  
    iTunes for IU - Look for IST
8More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/module3c - 0 views

    • lyplank
       
      Important addition of communication theories ... 1 point to Brian from Lori
    • lyplank
       
      Excellent job of relating Dale's cone to constructivism. 1 point to Sarah from Lori
  • When I read Dale’s Cone of Experience I was immediately reminded of constructivism in that they both provide the learners with a hands on, learner directed type experiences. According to Dale “[t]he base of the cone represents direct reality itself as we experience it firsthand
  • ...5 more annotations...
    • lyplank
       
      Excellent note on Thorndike's foreshadowing programmed instruction. 1 point to Teresa from Lori I also like your statement regarding personalized instruction. I've read many references as to an advantage of distance learning in that it allows students to progress at their own pace.
    • bdashew
       
      For laying this foundational information on the first day of this week's wiki session. 1 point for Lori.
    • bdashew
       
      I think this was one of the most intruguing debates of this week's session. 1 point to Doug for raising it 1 point to Chris for sustaining the argument
    • bdashew
       
      For picking up on what I think is a pretty interesting topic, questioning it, and expanding on it. 1 point to Pat.
    • lyplank
       
      Great point about standardization in instruction. 1 point to Chris from Lori
4More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/module3b - 0 views

  • A doctor wouldn't order an ultrasound to diagnose a broken foot and I don't believe an instructional designer should advocate using a constructivist approach when the goal is very behavioristic
    • mikemathews
       
      good analogy, better point. 1pt to Lori
    • cbruncli
       
      Brian, thanks for keeping me on my toes. - 1pt - Chris
    • cbruncli
       
      Great overview Sarah. 1pt - Chris
14More

r511 » module3a - 0 views

    • cbruncli
       
      Pat - I agree with Brian, good explaination, 1 pt. - Chris
    • cbruncli
       
      Brian - good job in "jumping-in" with Teresa. 1 pt -Chris
    • cbruncli
       
      Lori - thanks for the response and the "paper" comment (above) it really made me reflect on paper usage. 1pt -Chris
  • ...11 more annotations...
    • cbruncli
       
      Teresa - 1pt for bringing up the gereration divide. -Chris
    • bdashew
       
      Lori, I was curious about this as well. Unfortunately, since my business is developing web-based courses, I'm probably not the right person to ask (we don't believe in workbooks and paper!). But I am curious to hear what response you get.
    • bdashew
       
      Excellent point Pat. Well-stated and backed up well. 1 pt.
    • bdashew
       
      Whose is this?
    • bdashew
       
      Teresa--I like that you have not only explained what the role should be but what needs to happen to get there, too. Great work! 1 pt.
    • bdashew
       
      Chris I like that you continue to grow on what you have put in previous posts. It's great to be able to see your thoughts changing and growing over time during this course. Thanks for sharing your evolving thought processes with us. 1 pt.
    • bdashew
       
      Lori--thanks for continuing to bring in outside resources for us to explore in addition to the course readings. Your attention to detail and to providing depth of examples is terrific. 1 pt.
    • pmoseley
       
      Doug, Excellent point. This is one of the issues I deal with all the time at work. You can't simply re-purpose old instructional (or presentation) materials, and call it "online training." 1 pt
    • pmoseley
       
      Brian, I think the approach you describe here is an important one, especially from the third-party provider's point of view. The more we can create instructional programs that integrate into or augment existing F2F approaches, the more likely IT folks will get that buy-in. But beyond just buy-in from potential clients, the blended approach is likely more effective from the learners' perspective as well. 1 pt
    • pmoseley
       
      Teresa, Good point on integrating use of technology into the general curriculum. 1 pt from Pat
    • pmoseley
       
      Chris, Thanks for the question regarding the "value" of good training or instructional materials. Makes you wonder: is price really a function of instructional quality? Maybe on the corporate side it should be. I don't know. I don't an answer. 1 pt
1More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/Chris - 0 views

shared by lyplank on 01 Jul 07 - No Cached
    • lyplank
       
      I have been struggling to make the distinction between PBL and CBL. I really needed this validation that I was on the right track. Thanks for taking the time to review this article in a busy week! Chris 1 point from Lori
2More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/Teresa%27s+Module+2C - 0 views

    • bdashew
       
      I think this is an incredibly effective explanation of constructivisim because of this dual learning outcome explanation. Great work (1 value point from bdashew)
    • lyplank
       
      As well as chunking this is a great example of working from simple to complex tasks. Like Chris, I would have thought you started with 1 and ended with 12. Teresa 1 point from Lori
1More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/Response2c - 0 views

    • lyplank
       
      Excellent overview of behaviorism. Sarah 1 point from Lori
2More

http://r511.wikispaces.com/Brian+Dashew%27s+Module+2C+Response - 0 views

    • bdashew
       
      Thanks for this really interesting dialog. I really appreciate the perspective that you two bring to these discussions and the attention with which you read, respond, and engage in my posts. for Lori and Chris, 1 value point each.
    • lyplank
       
      Your explanation of hierarchical relationships made that concept clearer for me. I was having trouble with the one. Brian 1 point from Lori
2More

r511 » Lori Plank Module 2C Response - 0 views

    • bdashew
       
      Great clarification. Thanks, Lori (1 value point for this excellent explanation)
  • using a strictly cognitivist approach, this would be one element of a larger plan. For example, I would start with getting the learners attention, i.e. describe an evisceration (opening of a wound) due to incorrect suture selection. Next, link new information to existing, i.e. discussion microbiology and the principles of infection as they relate to sutures. Organize the information, the organizer would be useful here. Assimilate new knowledge into existing ... Describe situations in which the various sutures would be used. Strengthen through rehearsal, as mentioned. The instructor could observe the practice and provide feedback. A test over the sutures would follow. Ultimately, there would be authentic context application in the clinical setting.
39More

r511 » Module2B - 0 views

  • conduct inspections on actual vessels and performance critiqued
    • drleftwich
       
      This sounds like it might be more related to a constructivist framework with the authentic practice. What's the difference here? What does everyone else think?
    • cbruncli
       
      I agree, the group does a mock inspection, once complete they would all discuss what went right and wrong with an instuctor there for guidence. This is a constructivist concept (social negotiation). I will use this type of example over in the constructivist page. However, I also think it fits here as it is practice w/ feedback. However, in congntivism the member would practice the skill and the instructor would provide the feedback (which sometimes happens).
  • Discovery learning refers to the process of obtaining knowledge through one’s own efforts. In the Surgical Technology program we use this form of learning to allow students to manipulate materials in computer simulation that allows them to discover important concepts related to operating room technique. The idea of discovery learning is that students are more likely to remember concepts or principles that they discover on their own. After presentation of fundamental information students work with an interactive CD-ROM that simulates a real life experience in the operating room allowing them to perform many skills necessary for a successful operation. Students are given the opportunity through case study and computer-based simulation to prepare the OR and the patient. They can use drag and drop to experiment with the selection of which instruments should be given to the surgeon at the appropriate time. Students can request “coaching” in the form of tips, hints or brief multimedia explanations called “Pearls of Wisdom.” Selection of inappropriate materials or techniques may lead to simulated patient complications. Students must then discover which action lead to the complication and then learn to correct that action. Use of the CD-ROM format also allows for presentation of the information in multiple formats (audio and visual) which enhances learning.
    • drleftwich
       
      It seems like this is more of a constructivist standpoint... Can you post this on the constructivist page?
  • do all the students come together and discuss what went right or wrong or is the student only interacting with the computer?
    • drleftwich
       
      Chris = 1 point. Chris makes an excellent point here, showing the difference between cognitivism and constructivism. Note that when the students come together, they can construct their own understanding. The teacher is the facilitator in this case. However, what happens if the student is just interacting with the computer? Is this constructivist? Is the student able to construct their own knowledge this way? What about when we go on the Internet to look up information? Is that a constructivist learning experience?
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • The difficulty comes in teaching them when to use specific instruments, a more ill-structured problem as there are many variables
    • drleftwich
       
      Do you think this is an effective use of this instructional approach? If given the choice, do you think this is the most effective? What about efficiency? How would you make this decision?
    • drleftwich
       
      Chris = 1 point. This is an excellent question Chris. You've really highlighted an important part of the differences between the cognitive and constructivist framework here. In constructivist frameworks, we are typically looking to the students to construct their own knowledge and by coming together and discussing the end result, students are more likely to construct their own knowledge based on experiences.
  • I really can't find a lot of examples in which we personally use cognitivist methods.
    • drleftwich
       
      What about when we use Mnemonic devices or analogies or advanced organizers (tables, charts, etc...)? This all helps us move and process information in a more efficient way. For example, I know many biology courses begin by comparing red blood cells to trucks and how they transport oxygen. Some analogies can become quite elaborate.
  • problem-based learning
    • drleftwich
       
      This article looks at the difference between Case-Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning. http://www.im.org/AAIM/Pubs/Docs/articlesofinterest/Srinivasan-January.pdf Also, look for Project-Based Learning.... These are all very similar, but have different definitions. Just be careful how you use them...
  • This approch suits the medical field very well.
    • drleftwich
       
      Why is this a good fit? Why do you think this is a better approach than others? Also, what about getting students the content information? How do you provide the resources they need while still allowing them to explore and "construct" their own knowledge? Excellent discussion Lori. I award you 1 point. ~Dr. Leftwich
  • scaffolding
  • I've heard of the Smart Board, unfortunately we don't have it at IPS. Perhaps we'll be able to attain more funding in the future for technology at our schools.
  • Elementary teachers also use Collaborative Learning in the classroom. It is not typically used on a daily basis, rather it is used when big projects are assigned. For example, students are to present a project on the different vitamins A, D, E, etc., their importance to the human body and in which foods can they be found. The students are broken into groups of four, each group is to have a type written report, a visual (poster), and an oral report. Each student has a responsibility in the group and they are to work together and have one complete project by the due date
    • drleftwich
       
      Why is this a constructivist or cognitivist principle? Example to me the connection.
  • Do you find this one hard in purely lecture presentation?
    • cbruncli
       
      Yes, it is hard but I find it must be reiterated consistently so the learner can comprehend the importance or start to believe what is being sold. After reflection, I am stretching the "what is in it for me," qualification is not really for the member but for the CG to have another person to be able to effect mission (inspect vsls) individually and not take another resource (another qualified inspector) for training. Most units have timelines when a person is to meet a goal (qualification) and if the goal is not met then there are consequences (i.e. lower evaluations). So, qualification is "in it for me" so I meet my personal mandated goal. Some do see it institutionally but most selfishly.
  • Chris-- I'm curious how effective objectives at the beginning of a class are as an organizational tool for students. Are they presented again throughout? How does it help students to organize content in a way that helps them interpret and appl
    • cbruncli
       
      Brian - Good question and one that is not easily answered. For each lesson the objectives are given up front and followed-up with in the end. This is good as most of the test questions come from the objectives, which makes it beneficial. However, from the cognitive learning standpoint it would depend on the individual if they focused on what they were to learn up front and what they learned in the end. They are not normally emphasized only given. I think most are just happy to get through the lesson:).
    • cbruncli
       
      Brian - Good question and one that is not easily answered. For each lesson the objectives are given up front and followed-up with in the end. This is good as most of the test questions come from the objectives, which makes it beneficial. However, from the cognitive learning standpoint it would depend on the individual if they focused on what they were to learn up front and what they learned in the end. They are not normally emphasized only given. I think most are just happy to get through the lesson:).
  • If the inspections are very methodical and vary little between vessels shouldn't the learners' realities by convergent rather than divergent. Wouldn't you would want each evaluator to inspect very specific things on the vessel and then come up with the same evaluation. If this were constructivist wouldn't different ways of thinking be encouraged.
    • cbruncli
       
      Lori - yes I see your point and think you are correct. However, I do think the learner's realities are convergent as they are coming to a focal point (vsl inspection) through many views. As anyone that has a boat will tell you, there are a lot of systems and machinery on a vessel. One must use mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, naval architecture (building and stability), structural fire protection, tonnage (gross and net), navigation, lifesaving firefighting (different at sea than on land), maritime security, accommodation spaces, health and occupational safety, etc. As you can see, as stated above, there are a lot of systems and the CG has to bring a lot of specialties together to be effect learning. So, for example, during a critique the mechanical engineers can guide the "deck" backgrounds and "Deck" can guide the Engineers on lifesaving systems. As explained here it is a constructivist point but I have in under cognitivism as in its basic form it is only practice with feedback and sometimes the instructor does give individual attention:).
  • I like how you laid out the learning process step by step. I really helps to see a complete outline. - guest (69.14.250.51) Today 4:14 am skmcinto
    • cbruncli
       
      Thank you Sarah!
  • I really felt that the use of the computer based instruction was more cognitivist but I'm trying to do more research on that.
    • cbruncli
       
      Lori - I think if it is just a PowerPoint then it would be cognitivism. If the program offers links to different sites and views it would be constructivism under multiple modes of learning and multiple perspectives (Driscoll). What do you think?
  • have trouble with this one ... we do a lot of this will lab skills, i.e. encouraging students while trying to learn to put on sterile gloves or thread suture needles, but with theory we seem to skip this step (also the what's in it for me step ... it's always graduation, certification, avoiding getting yelled at but we don't repeat that often). Do you find this one hard in purely lecture presentation? After reviewing your very clear example here it's helped me to see where these other steps (1a and 2 through 5) are included in our methods as well
    • cbruncli
       
      1 point Brian and Lori for a good conversation making me think and rethink my post - Chris
    • cbruncli
       
      1 point Teresa for talking about this "station" learning it really got me thinking. - Chris
    • pmoseley
       
      Chris,Lori, Brian: a point to each from Pat for your dissection of this cognitivist approach.
    • pmoseley
       
      I think you do a good job of illustrating the emphasis of effeciency and consistency in the cognitivist approach. 1pt to Sarah from Pat
  •  
    This website has some interesting information (the clif notes version) of what Chris was talking about..... http://www.foshay.org/PDFs/COGNITIVEAPPROACH.pdf
  •  
    Lori,
  •  
    Yes
4More

r511 » module2b - 0 views

    • lyplank
       
      I like your description of "centers" ... i think that i could apply this to my own area ... maybe dividing the instrument types into "centers" Teresa 1 point from Lori
    • lyplank
       
      You've summarized this nicely … I like the way you've linked it to the Silber chart Sarah 1 point from Lori
    • lyplank
       
      Great comments throughout … you made me really question a couple of my perspectives, i.e. what's in it for me Brian 1 point from Lori
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • lyplank
       
      I really like the way you organized your example. It was very relevant to the reading. Your explanation really helped me to understand some of that. I think of the 3 theories, I've had the hardest time with cognitivism. Chris 1 point from Lori
1 - 20 of 34 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page