Video: The machine is using us. This video is a visual timeline that explains how the use of technology has changed since 1996. It demonstrates the difference between HTML which was designed to define the structure of a web document. When people were first creating websites, they had to understand and imput the computer code that supported the website, you had to be knowledgeable beyond what everyday users (such as myself) saw on the screen. Form and content were dependent on each other. Today, xml or digital text is used so the data can be formatted without having to know complicated code. It lets users create blogs and websites and edit wikipedia without having to understand the process behind their creations. This has made information much more accessible and changes the way people use and interact with "facts" and stories and any type of information we can think of. In other words, Web 2.0, which is really what this video is about, has redefined how we use our machines and it has become inextricably linked with the sharing of information in our world.

Article: If We Didn't have the schools we have today, would we create the schools we have today? Although a bit dated with references to CD Roms etc. (circa 2000), this article is talking about the difference between how we prepare our educators and the actual way students learn in a globally aware and connected world. We continue to base our public school system on the industrial age model where teachers are expected to know information, then parcel it out to students in a conscripted and linear manner. This article argues that today's learners have gone so far beyond this model, it's incredible that schools exist in the same way as they did for the last century. If engineers or doctors still operated the same way they did 100 years ago, they would have no credibility. Why then, do schools systems insist on continuing with the status quo. If we had the chance (if we weren't paid by provincial governments) would we still create the school system we have today or would we completely overhaul it? There is a place in Canada that is trying to do just that. My daughter has been looking into applying at Quest University, a private university in Squamish, BC where the educators don't call themselves professors, they have no defined departments, and the students have significant input into the curriculum. They work on a block system where students immerse themselves in one subject entirely for a month, then move on to another subject. They may take language for September, biology for October, then calculus for November etc. This creates the opportunity to immerse themselves in a discipline and develop a much deeper level of understanding. The similarities between Quest's mandate and this article is interesting. The author states "everyone becomes a learner in a Networked Learning Community, and the distinctions between students and teachers fade away." There are three dimensions to a networked learning community and today we only use the first one. Teacher.

This is a great website for researching animals for primary students