Skip to main content

Home/ Idaho Librarians/ Group items tagged public

Rss Feed Group items tagged

anonymous

Cyber Bullying Prevention - Learning @ IdahoPTV - (Idaho Public Television) - 0 views

  • n observation of National Bullying Prevention Month (October), Idaho Public Television has gathered together several collections of broadcast programs and online resources designed to raise awareness about how to prevent bullying.
anonymous

Idaho State Department of Education - Finance & Technology - Public Certified and Nonce... - 1 views

  • Public Certified and Noncertified Personnel Annual Statistical Reports
anonymous

10 Great Places - USATODAY.com Photos - 0 views

  • Weippe Public Library Idaho's Weippe Public Library includes exhibits on Lewis and Clark, who passed through the area on their historic expedition. More: 10 great places to take a library tour
anonymous

Going Out of Print - 1 views

  • Going Out of Print School libraries of the future could be light on books and heavy on digital resources.
  • To what extent will public school libraries morph into digital media centers where paper books are merely a side dish and e-books are the main course?
  • To what extent will public school libraries morph into digital media centers where paper books are merely a side dish and e-books are the main course?
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • “What’s needed is a wiki-type virtual space where kids can debate, upload videos and control their own information space instead of us trying to manage the information space,” Loertscher says.
  • For David Loertscher, Library 2.0 advocate and author of The New Learning Commons, these changes are overdue. “There is still a tremendous role for books,” he says. “There will always be print books.” However, his ideal library—the learning commons—is “a learning laboratory where books don’t get in the way.” He wants the bookshelves pushed to the perimeter so central spaces can better accommodate groups of learners (see sidebar). Loertscher believes that “the old model of having the kids check out a book and then sending them back to the classroom doesn’t amount to a hill of beans. Kids can now check out digital resources any time, anywhere. … That is the way the world is going.”
  • “Today’s library is a learning space, not a … book museum.”
anonymous

Kindling a Passion for Literature - 0 views

  •  
    International Society for Technology in Education - Learning & Leading
anonymous

NAEP reading-2011-framework - 1 views

  •  
    Common Core Reading based on the 2009 NAEP Reading Framework
anonymous

Harassment-Free-Expression - Guidelines for Free and Safe Public Schools - 1 views

  •  
    Harassment, Bullying and Free Expression
anonymous

8 things teachers should never do on Facebook - 2 views

  •  
    This is more complicated when one has a student in high school like I do, and his friends are on Facebook & want to be my "friends." These kids spend the night at my house, eat at my table, and slouch on my couch. Those are the only students I allow to be FB friends, and I still try to maintain an appropriate profile considering all my friends. I consider it an honor that they don't mind being hooked up with me in a public way, and my FB friendship also helps THEM to re-consider some of their posts.
anonymous

Which social network should I use as a librarian? - 0 views

  • Which social network should I use as a librarian?
  • I've already hinted at this, but it's time to be more specific. My online contacts are now the way in which I get my information. They (or probably you) are constantly sending me a stream of useful stuff, which is personalized to my interests, based on my choices of who to follow, and who to pay attention to. So this isn't 'social' in the way that we're used to thinking of it, it's a hugely influential stream of data. If I follow you, you influence me, and if you follow me, I'm influencing you. It may be simply because the tweets or links are funny or interesting, or they match my personal interests.
  • The amount of data that's flooding out is truly daunting, and if I didn't have a social network - or rather, several of them, I simply wouldn't be able to cope. My filters are no longer based on the magazines that I read, or the evening news, they're based on the people that I follow. Now, this is really important I think, because what it does is links me into particular communities. The data I am served is important, but the community is increasingly valuable.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • My RSS feeds are similarly hugely important to me. My feeds and the information there, drawn from blogs, searches, profile pages and the like are not there for me to read every single one - that way would lie insanity. They are there to alert me to news that I'm likely to find important. Any one of those blogs or posts or tweets are saying 'this is happening, go check it out' with the important link. I don't need to read everything that each of my contacts has said (although sometimes I do, if I want lots of different views and opinions), because they're all pointing me to the source, and I can go off there and read what I need.
  • By using social media it's much easier to get the information that you need quickly and effectively by asking a question in the right format. I couldn't remember who wrote the piece which I've now attributed to Woodsiegirl, but I had the answer within seconds from several different sources by tweeting the question.
  • This is why - as librarians - we need to be involved in as many social networks as we possibly can. By doing this we're absolutely doing our professional job - we're helping to create and maintain communities - and it doesn't matter if that's a workplace community, a community based on geography or one that's based on specific content. We have to consider how to curate data within this social media environment, and I'll look at that in more detail later. Secondly, we're acting as authority filters. I know that when I get a tweet about a subject it's going to be good quality. I don't have the same trust with something like Google, or pretty much any other search engine. There are exceptions to this rule, since search engines are beginning to inject Facebook data into the SERPs, but in general, I'll trust people a lot more than I'll trust a computer. And - when it comes down to it, I'm going to trust a librarian more than just about anyone else.
  • The point however is that often we don't know we're in specific groups, but we can nonetheless play very important roles. Just because you don't think you're important doesn't actually mean that you're not. I really want to push this point once more before moving on. In my experience librarians do not often think they are that important, and they don't value their skills as highly as they should. Please do consider the value that you can give to others within your social networks - even when you're doubtful that you do give value!
  • The more that librarians do - NOW - with social media, the more that we're going to already be embedded into the social medium. The more contacts, friends, links, tweets, photographs, likes, +1's that we have, the more influential we can become. The more influential we are, the more people will link to what we're doing, the more we'll be working in networks of influence and the more useful we can be to people."
  • This can all be neatly summarized with the phrase that I use all the time 'go to where the conversations are'. We all know that users of library services are physically using them less, so we need to really utilise social to keep in contact with them. But it's more than that. We need to show them - by using social media how valuable contact with us can be. The more value we can provide, the more likely our work is going to filter up and down the information chain. People are increasingly taking the view that if news is important, it will find them. For many people - particularly younger users, 'checking the news' means looking on Facebook because for them, the 'news' is what they see, read have shared with them, and share with others. Similiarly, I share my information via Facebook, Twitter, Google+, my blog, LinkedIn and so on. It doesn't just get posted onto my site. We can't do that any longer. At the end of this article I've put up a quick poll - I'm really interested to see how YOU found this article. It's one question, and will take about 5 seconds to answer.
  • This new way of providing content and added value is not going to sit happily with traditional users of media - even if they think that they have made the leap into the internet. The traditional CEO, publishers of books, magazines and other print material, traditional authors, advertisers, press and publicity directors are not going to flourish. If we, as librarians think that we've got it bad, it's as nothing in comparison to those folks.
  • The main difference is that we know we have to change and adapt or we'll die.
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20 items per page