Skip to main content

Home/ IBM: Standards and Double Standards/ Group items tagged rick jelliffe

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Paul Merrell

Balance of interest ~= Broader representation - O'Reilly Broadcast - 0 views

broadcast.oreilly.com/...ce-of-interest-broader-re.html

rob weir ad hominem attacks rick jelliffe

shared by Paul Merrell on 04 Jun 09 - Cached
  • Rick, on the other hand, by my count, with his various calls for greater "balance", has racked up the impressive total of zero new members. Standards activist? Certainly not an effective one.
  • Paul Merrell on 04 Jun 09
     
    Rob Weir racks up another ad hominem attack, this time against Rick Jelliffe.
Paul Merrell

The conspiracy to save ODF from being so crappy - O'Reilly Broadcast - 0 views

broadcast.oreilly.com/...onspiracy-to-save-odf-fro.html

rob weir retractions confessions double standards

shared by Paul Merrell on 12 Jun 09 - Cached
  • I hope you will verify these facts, if needed, and correct your misstatements regarding OASIS process and the ODF's TC's work. Then you can go back to telling us again how you and Alex are not spreading lies about ODF. -Rob
  • Paul Merrell on 12 Jun 09
     
    Here we learn two things about IBM's Rob Weir. First, score another ad hominem attack for him because of his innuendo suggesting that Rick Jelliffe and Alex Brown are liars. Second, we learn that Mr. Weir expects a retraction to be made when inaccurate statements are brought to a blog author's attention. Having been recently outed for rewriting history to call Alex Brown and Wikipedia names and having confessed to silently editing his blog in relevant regard, will Mr. Weir correct his own blog article? See http://www.adjb.net/post/No-one-supports-ISO-ODF-today.aspx and Weir's confession in the comments on that page. Or are retractions yet another case of an IBM double standard?
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20▼ items per page