Daniel Craig talks about the making of the movie, but more importantly the characters. It's interesting to see how an actor sees his characters and those around him.  He is joined by Rhys Ifans who describes his character, Jed as "a prey in a predatory role" - very interesting.

What type of stalker do you think Jed Parry is based on this article?

How well do you think this trailer captures the novel? Is it different from how you "pictured" it?

You'll have to be a patient with this one because this video is an explanation of a revision strategy, but at the same time it also has some good terms and literary elements to look out for; for example, "pathetic fallacy". 

A lot of text about the disorder, but some interesting historical notes, leading all the way back to Hippocrates. I don't expect you all to read this word for word, but a skimming of the text could be fruitful. 

A New York Times article about Enduring love from January 15, 1998.  

A New York Times review of Enduring Love from January 25, 1998. 

A decent modelling of Individual Oral Commentary. This person's summary and analysis of chapter 22 brings up some pretty relevant things about McEwan's writing in this chapter and about what is happening "mechanically" as well as thematically here. 

An interesting first-person account of McEwan's writing process. 

McEwan makes an interesting comment at the end of this interview about Jed Parry: "I think one of his [McEwan's son's] tutors thought that the stalker in Enduring Love carried the authorial, moral center of the novel; whereas I thought he was a complete madman."