Group items tagged

The new health care effective 2013 will introduce an excise tax on all medical devices such as bed pans and stents. Being one of the main states with companies that produce medical devices, Minnesota will take about 25% hit of the newly levied tax. So there have been a lot protests in the state. However others parts of the medical sector such as hospitals and pharmaceutical companies are said to benefit from this tax since more people will have insurance to pay for medical facilities and drugs. The tax is also going to lead to a large of people being fired from the companies. The CEO of Medtronic, a large and prominent company in Minnesota said it will have to 1000 people go in the next year. Smaller companies are likely to be affected even worse by the tax.

In this article author talks about excise tax and specificly about excise tax that was imposed in 1898 and survived till nowadays. The purpose of that taxation was to pay for the Spanish-American War. The war was over in 6 months but tax stayed. The amount received from taxation was about $300 billion, and the amount spend on war was $6 billion. This tax is very unfair to customers, "This is a 19th-century tax on a 21st-century technology," says Jim Cicconi, AT&T's general counsel. The original purpose of the tax was to raise revenue for a specific purpose, and to do so in a way that would not be noticed by the average consumer. Today, the purpose is gone, and consumers are definitely feeling the pinch. Businesses and consumers pay the same: 3% of the total. On a $100 phone bill, that works out to $3. On a $10,000 bill - not uncommon for businesses - the tab is about $300. Another important fact pointed in that article is that phones were luxury during XIX century, but now they are almost necessities. Seven federal courts have so far declared the tax to be illegal.

The government in Manila is taking advantage of taxing Tobacco. Franklin M. Drilon, acting chairman of the senate, is trying to make this tax a done deal. He thinks it should be taxed because it is a "sin" product. It would see the government raise 40-45 billion Peso's in tax revenue. Senator Ferdinand R. Marcos is concerned about this and is doing his best to prevent this tax. He knows the affects it could have on the tobacco farmers. There are about 18,000 tobacco farmers who are concerned about this tax. I think this is unfair of the Government. I don't think tobacco is a "sin" good, as it is many peoples alternative to drugs. This tax could put many producers out of jobs seeing as the demand will not be as high, and also this tax could force poor people to go back to cheaper alternatives that are very unhealthy and addictive.

Hong Kong government has decided to impose 15% excise tax on property in Hong Kong that is bought by foreigners. This is a difficult measure for many foreigners wishing to purchase houses in Hong Kong. Some foreigners that has been around for several years are also not feeling as happy as before. Some clients are also thinking about leaving. The government primary reason is to protect its economy from inflating property resulting from foreign investments, low interest rates, and limited supply of housing in the market. Clearly, this situation is related to the topic of excise tax, or specifically, ad valorem tax- fixed percentage is charged on a particular good. This has led to an increase in price, which leads to a fall in demand from foreign investors that wish to invest in Hong Kong properties. This shows that properties are in fact elastic products, but government is able to impose tax since it does not affect the producers dramatically and it does not affect the majority of the consumers. Only foreign investors are affected. Realtor can still generate sales from local investors.

A ruling has been passed leaving medial device makers stuck with an excise tax on sales of replacement hips, implantable defibrillators and other FDA-approved devices. This tax is intended to help finance the health law's board expansion of insurance coverage and is expected to raise $20 billion by 2019. The tax, which will commence January 1st 2013, has already affected some manufactures. Few companies will be able to pass all or even a small amount of the tax onto hospitals or distributors, resulting in many companies to begin putting cost-cutting plans in place. It is expected that smaller companies will take the worst hits, small device makers could see earnings per share fall by 10%. Because the tax is on total sales, rather than profits, companies with the smallest margins, such as unprofitable start-ups, will face the deepest impact. The tax looms at a difficult time for the industry, as patients will then delay elective procedures. Unlike other health-care sectors, analysts don't expect device makers to benefit much from the expected flood of newly insured patients because they depend largely on older patients who are already covered by Medicare.

Medical devices encompass an extremely wide range of products, such as surgical gloves, dental instruments, wheelchairs, coronary stents, artificial knees and hips, defibrillators, cardiac pacemakers, irradiation equipment, and advanced imaging technology. The U.S. medical device industry has estimated total sales of $106 billion to $116 billion a year. A few large firms account for the lion's share of this revenue. For example, Johnson and Johnson's worldwide sales of medical devices and diagnostics totaled $26 billion in 2011; the firm had total sales (on both medical devices and other products) of $65 billion, on which it earned profits of nearly $10 billion. Medtronic had $16 billion in sales and profits of $3 billion in its 2011 fiscal year. One trade group has estimated that the ten largest medical device makers will account for 86 percent of the sales of covered medical devices and hence pay 86 percent of the receipts from the excise tax.

This article talks about an increase in the excise duty on soft drinks which are already subject to a 23pc VAT rate. With this measure the government is trying to reduce the obesity and to increase the revenues of the government. I think that this is a good idea because the problem of obesity is very concerning. Also the costs of treating the obesity are very high (in Spain the government is paying 37 million each for treating the obesity) Many doctors says that the obesity is the epidemic of the XXI century. The fat tax has been introduced in some countries in Europe. The problem is that these taxes are very unpopular because the food is a necessity product. The biggest impact of a tax increase would be felt by the young and lower income groups who are the biggest consumers of soft drinks.

This article talks about how the US government wants to take some reforms on health care with an ambitious plan made by the president Obama and the rest of the Democrats, the plan is that by imposing an excise tax on expensive health insurances enough revenue would be collected to provide the poorer with health insurances, unfortunely for Obama and the Democrats many people are against this reform, one of them saying that; "it would set the middle class against the poor - people struggling to keep health insurance against people struggling to get it." As many people in the congress are against this Congressional Democrats are looking for a better way to get the revenue needed in order to take this ambitious plan ahead.

This article talks about the importance of caring about the environment because this year there have been alarming weather activities possibly caused by climate change: Droughts, floods, the record melting of Arctic ice and the recent Superstorm Sandy. We can´t affirm that this happened because there is a change in the climate but we have to admit that this is one of the possibilities. If we don´t do nothing the situation will be getting worst. The water level is increasing more than we have predicted and many specialists admit that San Francisco and other cities near the coast might be under water in 20 years. Retrospect, we have neglected the full costs and hidden environmental price tags of economic progress. Only if we are aware of the externalities of our actions can we then build a more organic living environment and actively cut down emissions.