Skip to main content

Home/ Media & Culture @ HM/ Group items tagged this

Rss Feed Group items tagged

india art n design

Keeping it familiar! - 0 views

  •  
    Igarashi Design Studio creates child-friendly interiors for pre-schoolers in Tokyo. Check out this endearing project and leave us your views...
india art n design

New York Horizon - will "sidescraper" be the new skyscraper? - 0 views

  •  
    New concepts and ideologies to counter growing urban concerns spearhead the 2016 eVolo award-winner - New York Horizon. Check out this concept and tell us what you think about it…
india art n design

Mexico's naturally raw house - 0 views

  •  
    Celebrating the intrinsic beauty of materials and opening up the home to nature, this house in Mexico is built along renowned architect R. Legoretta's principles of luxury. Check it out and leave us your views…
Glenda Guerrero

Raging Grannies - 0 views

  •  
    I first came across this group of activists after August 2010 hot topic on Mobile Net Neutrality
chris kim

New Media protection Vs. Traditional protection of Media - 0 views

  •  
    This article, taken from the "Montreal Gazette," talks about the copyright of new media material. Traditionally, there are three main categories of media protection: Copy Right, Trademark, and Patent. "In terms of new media, the category of protection that most often applies is copyright." The article goes on to say that copyright is automatic as long as your product is original and fixed. Meaning the work was 1) not copied and 2) the idea has to have a "Tangible form." Just a couple of things to think about when protecting your ideas. -Ck
Stephanie Chi

Atty: MN woman can't pay for sharing songs - 0 views

  •  
    "I can't afford to pay any amount. It's not a matter of won't, it's a matter of I can't." In Minnesota, this is the response that Jammie Thomas-Rasset made about paying 1.5 million dollars for the illegal sharing of music online. Each of the 24 songs that she illegally violated copyrights on is $62,500. Her defense is that she can't afford to pay that kind of money, especially since she is the mother of four children. Sharing over 1,700 songs on Kazaa, a file-sharing site, the Recording Industry of America, on numerous occasions, had tried to settle with the woman at $5,000. The stubborn Thomas-Rasset refused and was criticized for not taking responsibility for her actions. Due to all these problems, Jammie was taken on trial and was proven guilty. Jammie persistently denies her use of Kazaa and is willing to keep fighting. Many people are in the same position as Jammie, and as the saying goes, "Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time."
Kevin Yoon

The $105 Fix That Could Protect You From Copyright-Troll Lawsuits - 0 views

  •  
    There is a law, that allows "any blog or other website to register a DMCA takedown agent with the U.S. Copyright Office, an obscure bureaucratic prerequisite to enjoying a legal "safe harbor" from copyright lawsuits over third-party posts, such as reader comments." This is a reason why websites like youtube can exist. However, there is a loophole to law. A company based on Las vegas bought copy right for the Las Vegas Review-Journal, just for the purpose of suing any websites who have failed to pay 105 dollars and register with United States Copyright Office.
Sinai Cruz

Copyright Risks in Embedding Youtube Clips - 0 views

  •  
    Embedding Youtube videos into your website can be a dangerous thing, as it might not be you that's uploaded a copyright infringing video, but it can be you that accidentally embeds a Youtube clip that is infringing made by someone else, into your website. The law against this is: Any time you incorporate a copyrighted work into a site without the rightsholders' consent, you're potentially liable to be sued. Because people are seeing that on your website, it doesn't matter if it's on Youtube or not, or whether you made it or not, you embedded it somewhere else. It also does not matter whether the person knew it was copyright infringement or not. If an innocent embedder were to be taken to court, they could still be fined up to $30,000. However, because of Youtube's copyright infringement policy, it can remove the copyrighted work from Youtube and the websites it was embedded in. Also, there would be little gain for the rightsholder if the person with the website they sued couldn't afford a lawsuit, which would hardly be worth their time. Also, there are precautions that the embedder should take as well, to ensure that even if they do post copyrighted material, they won't really be potential candidates to be sued.
Maia S-H

This Looks Shopped - 0 views

  •  
    Tons of photoshopped pictures...
Imani Moise

OH NO THEY DIDN'T!!! Tyra To Talk To Black Women BLEACHING THEIR SKIN And The... - 0 views

    • Imani Moise
       
      hey watch this video :] kinda sad :[
Nick Faba

Sneaky Labeling: Mott's Will Help You Water Down Your Juice If You Like - 0 views

    • Nick Faba
       
      Look at what this guy found. Try to look for product label lies and exagerations, especially pay attention to serving size info
Nick Faba

TinEye Image Search - 0 views

  •  
    This is Very cool
Nick Faba

think you've got patience? This took 960 hours in photoshop - 0 views

shared by Nick Faba on 17 Dec 08 - Cached
  •  
    960 Hours in PS
Nick Faba

Breaking News, Weather, Business, Health, Entertainment, Sports, Politics, Travel, Scie... - 0 views

shared by Nick Faba on 10 Sep 08 - Cached
    • Nick Faba
       
      Check out this Tank/sub thing
  •  
    Hey guys, here's an interesting pic
Alexa Brickman

Jersey Shore - 1 views

  •  
    Even more New York Times coverage of the MTV show "Jersey Shore"
  •  
    This article gives five reasons to like jersey shore. It says that the show jersey shore has made jersey shore itself more interesting, it as gotten higher ratings, and says that young people need some bad examples
Adam Kenner

Text - Text - Obama's State of the Union Address - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new. Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let's meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let's try common sense. (Laughter.) A novel concept.To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust -– deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue -- to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; to give our people the government they deserve. (Applause.)That's what I came to Washington to do. That's why -– for the first time in history –- my administration posts on our White House visitors online. That's why we've excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs, or seats on federal boards and commissions.But we can't stop there. It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or with Congress. It's time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office.With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests –- including foreign corporations –- to spend without limit in our elections. (Applause.) I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. (Applause.) They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.I'm also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. Applause.) Democrats and Republicans. (Applause.) Democrats and Republicans. You've trimmed some of this spending, you've embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. (Applause.) Tonight, I'm calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single Web site before there's a vote, so that the American people can see how their money is being spent. (Applause.)
  •  
    See highlighted section on the Supreme Court decision just past halfway
« First ‹ Previous 161 - 180 of 194 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page