Group items tagged

It however clarify things about how Google sees MVP in GWT. They're even adding some MVP "framework" to GWT 2.1 (IsWidget and Activities, where an Activity is more or less your presenter, from what I understood).

RequestFactory on the other hand is a new thing for efficient CRUD operations on entity objects, which plugs more-or-less directly into the new Data widgets. Those widgets do blur the line a bit, but they're not really about presentation "logic", and they're somehow MVP- based themselves.

My application has several modules, and in each module, it may have different layout. Hence I have multiple level of Activity and in each module, I have an ActivityManager and ActivityMapper to create an appropriate Activity according to the Place or return null if not interested.  All the ActivityManagers are attached to a global Event bus.

Views A key concept of MVP development is that a view is defined by an interface. This allows multiple view implementations based on client characteristics (such as mobile vs. desktop) and also facilitates lightweight unit testing by avoiding the time-consuming GWTTestCase. There is no View interface or class in GWT which views must implement or extend; however, GWT 2.1 introduces an IsWidget interface that is implemented by most Widgets as well as Composite. It is useful for views to extend IsWidget if they do in fact provide a Widget. Here is a simple view from our sample app. public interface GoodbyeView extends IsWidget {    void setName(String goodbyeName);} The corresponding implementation extends Composite, which keeps dependencies on a particular Widget from leaking out. public class GoodbyeViewImpl extends Composite implements GoodbyeView {    SimplePanel viewPanel = new SimplePanel();    Element nameSpan = DOM.createSpan();    public GoodbyeViewImpl() {        viewPanel.getElement().appendChild(nameSpan);        initWidget(viewPanel);    }    @Override    public void setName(String name) {        nameSpan.setInnerText("Good-bye, " + name);    }}

A place in GWT 2.1 is a Java object representing a particular state of the UI. A Place can be converted to and from a URL history token (see GWT's History object) by defining a PlaceTokenizer for each Place, and the PlaceHistoryHandler automatically updates the browser URL corresponding to each Place in your app.

Place

Activities are more tied to the concept of Places than of MVP, i.e. navigation and user experience rather than code structure ("developer experience").

I believe the reason we've not created View and Presenter interfaces to date is because there are two different styles of MVP widely in use, only one of which allows the view to call the presenter as in your example. Which leaves us in the funny position that the new MVP framework is missing *formal* definitions of View and Presenter. Personally, I think it's a good thing that GWT Activities and Places are independent of views and presenters so as not to force you into one model. I think View and Presenter as you've described would fall in the category of things that are not quite core code, but are nevertheless useful abstractions that probably need a home in the GWT source somewhere for reference. We'll chew on this a bit for 2.1.1...

The MVP Framework is an app framework that makes it easy for you to connect Data Presentation Widgets with backend data. Using this framework you create views that are focused on displaying data, Activities and an ActivityManager which are the "presenters", responsible for handling self-contained actions, and RequestFactories that fetch and propagate model changes throughout your app. To make developing apps of this style easier, the 1.1 M1 release of Spring Roo, can generate and maintain the boilerplate code associated with connecting your app's components with GWT's MVP Framework.

I really do not approach the different features of 2.1 as a whole "MVP" set of things: there's  - RequestFactory and ValueStore (I don't think ValueStore has any real use besides RequestFactory, though I'd be happy to be proved wrong) for a record-oriented client-server communication;  - Cell-based widgets for efficient data-backed lists, trees and tables  - PlaceController as typed layer over History (objects rather than strings, even though it's not yet plumbed to History, which at least proves it can be used without it)  - ActivityManager as an "application controller" (to use the term from the GWT tutorials) on top of PlaceController  - and on top of that, GWT provides some base activities plumbed with RequestFactory  - and finally, though it's not documented at all, EditorSupport which works with UiBinder in a view to generate "data-binding code" (as far as I understood) You're free to use any of them independently of the others.

First, though, I think you shouldn't call it MVP. In my opinion it seems that what you're doing is MVC where the model is helped out by RPC. There is already so much variety in the meanings of this (MVP, MVC, etc...), especially with Activities and Request Factory coming into the picture that terminology is becoming important. Not because I don't know what you're describing, but because someone new to the frameworks will get thoroughly confused.