In 2008-09, there was a collapse of global trade. We were all very surprised. Output was not doing well, but the collapse in global trade was enormous. We realized at the time that the elasticity of trade with respect to global output was not 1, as you might think, but more like 3 to 4. So this explained it. And then it recovered like crazy.
IMF's Blanchard: Global Economy Gripped By Meta-Uncertainty - WSJ.com - 0 views
-
-
This is still true. If global output goes down by 1%, global trade goes down by 3% to 4%.
-
What Europe needs to do:
- ...14 more annotations...
The German locomotive has become Europe's liability - FT.com - 0 views
-
It is true German exports to Russia and eastern Europe have declined since the beginning of the year. But, given that they never accounted for more than 4 per cent of total exports, this does little to explain the country’s lacklustre performance.
-
The main problem is not weak export demand or the reluctance of consumers to spend money but the fact that companies are unwilling to invest in new productive assets. Investment now accounts for a smaller portion of output in Germany than in most other industrialised countries.
-
Germany’s public investment in transport infrastructure and education has long been among the lowest in Europe.
- ...1 more annotation...
IBM Wants to Invent the Chips of the Future, Not Make Them - NYTimes.com - 0 views
-
For several months, IBM has been seeking to sell its chip-manufacturing operations
-
The most likely buyer is GlobalFoundries, a large contract chip manufacturer, the person said, for a price of probably less than $2 billion.
-
Ms. Rometty stated that while IBM’s priorities were in fields like data analytics and cloud computing, and it had agreed to sell its industry-standard computer server business to Lenovo of China for $2.3 billion, she added: “But let me be clear — we are not exiting hardware.”
- ...3 more annotations...
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20▼ items per page