One thing to be wary of is the number of false-positives coming from chkrootkit. It seems to alert for just about every .* directory it can find on the system, including bits of JDK, volatile tmpfs, and is subject to race-conditions falsely complaining about “hidden” processes when all that’s happened is a few have died since it compared lists. Processes in detached screen sessions seem to show up based on their ttys not being found in utmp. It seems to think my init is `INFECTED’ which is complete hokum. All this because it’s a kludged-up load of shell-scripts relying on grep for ill-defined regexp-matches.
So. I’m with rkhunter - it’s far more intelligent in operation, doing things like checking for changes in passwd and root-equivalent users between runs, for example. I can and do run both on all dozen-or-more debian boxes, but I take rkhunter far more seriously and only look for *changes* in output from chkrootkit.
Carolius Rexus on 23 Jan 14hope green is not the only color lol Bart is a file and folder backup tool, which transfers changes from multiple source directory trees to destination trees. When run, it will copy any files which have changed since the last run, bringing the destination up to date with the source in an efficient way, copying only files required.
Bart is an authomatyc file and folder backup tool, Bart es una herramienta de respaldo automatico de archivos y carpetas.
