Intellectual property - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views
-
Lawrence Lessig, along with many other copyleft and free software activists, have criticized the implied analogy with physical property (like land or an automobile). They argue such an analogy fails because physical property is generally rivalrous while intellectual works are non-rivalrous (that is, if one makes a copy of a work, the enjoyment of the copy does not prevent enjoyment of the original).
-
Some critics of intellectual property, such as those in the free culture movement, point at intellectual monopolies as harming health (in the case of pharmaceutical patents), preventing progress, and benefiting concentrated interests to the detriment of the masses,[34][35] and argue that the public interest is harmed by ever expansive monopolies in the form of copyright extensions, software patents, and business method patents.
-
intellectual property tends to be governed by economic goals when it should be viewed primarily as a social product;
- ...3 more annotations...