Power and Primacy of the Pope (1537): Smalcald Theologians - 5 views
-
calls himself [and boasts that he is] the vicar of Christ on earth
- ...58 more annotations...
-
arrogates
-
necessary to believe all these things in order to be saved
-
there shall not be lordship or superiority among them
-
signifying that among ministers there is not to be sovereignty
-
disciples on an equality, without any distinctio
-
From this start by a human law, i.e. the resolution of the Council, the authority of the Roman bishop first arose
-
how can the Pope be over the entire Church by divine right when the Church has the election, and the custom gradually prevailed that bishops of Rome were confirmed by the emperors
-
In all these passages Peter is the representative of the entire assembly of apostles [and does not speak for himself alone, but for all the apostles],
-
states that Peter spoke for all, when did the church start to think that Peter was divine?
-
Yeah, i agree. Peter is a representative, but not a superior power. But it is understandable that people would have misunderstood. If we weren't understanding this event from Luther, I would most likely to have misunderstood that Peter was greater than everyone else! However, I don't think power goes via him because that would mean he's 'different' than others, thus resulting in his superiority. Then it ruins the purpose of equality, right?
-
-
promise of the Gospel belongs certainly and immediately to the entire Church, so the keys belong immediately to the entire Church
-
Peter is the representative of the entire assembly of the apostles
-
Upon this rock I will build My Church, certainly the Church has not been built upon the authority of man, but upon the ministry of the confession which Peter made, in which he proclaims that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.
-
Christ was not sent to bear the sword or possess a worldly kingdom
-
From this persuasion horrible darkness has been brought into the Church, and after that also great commotions have arisen in Europe
-
but has also tyrannically exalted himself above all kings
-
the doctrine of the Pope conflicts in many ways with the Gospel, and [thirdly] the Pope assumes to himself divine authority in a threefold manner
-
Lastly, these errors so horrible, and this impiety, he defends with the greatest cruelty, and puts to death those dissenting.
-
partakers of the godless doctrine, blasphemies, and unjust cruelty of the Pope
-
They nowhere teach that sins are remitted freely for Christ's sake, and that by this faith we obtain remission of sins.
-
Thus they obscure the glory of Christ, and deprive consciences of firm consolation, and abolish true divine services, namely, the exercises of faith struggling with [unbelief and] despair [concerning the promise of the Gospel]
-
Then to these errors two great sins are added
-
he defends his errors by force and by murders, and forbids judicial examination
-
decisions of Synods are the decisions of the Church, and not of the Popes
-
bishop of Rome had the primacy by divine right, yet since he defends godless services and doctrine conflicting with the Gospel,
-
God's command that we flee idolatry, godless doctrine, and unjust cruelty
-
detract from the glory of Go
-
the command to excommunicate those whose crimes are known, and again to absolve those who repent.
-
when the regular bishops become enemies of the Church, or are unwilling to administer ordination, the churches retain their own right
-
there is the authority [command] to administer the Gospel
-
Paul also testifies
-
keys have been given to the Church, and not merely to certain person
-
r schism
-
It is certain that the common jurisdiction of excommunicating those guilty of manifest crimes belongs to all pastors
-
But what tyranny is it for the officials in the states to have arbitrary power to condemn and excommunicate men without due process of law!
-
bishops have tyrannically transferred this jurisdiction to themselves alone, and have basely abused it, there is no need, because of this jurisdiction, to obey bishops.
-
bishops have only by human right, and that, not a very old one, as appears from the Codex and Novellae of Justinian that decisions concerning marriage at that time belonged to the magistrates
-
It is sufficient to have recited this, that there are many unjust laws of the Pope concerning matrimonial subjects on account of which the magistrates ought to establish other courts.
-
It is true that what the Roman Catholic Church did was unjust. Yes, it was very manipulative and wrong for the Church to change many aspects of the original Church to support their power. However, I don't believe that it is ethically right for the rebels to respond so aggressively. This would most likely lead to physical violence, which it actually did.
-
-
Therefore [since the Holy Spirit in that connection utters dire threats] let those who defraud the Church know that they will pay God the penalty for this crime.