Skip to main content

Home/ Fall 2012 Challenges Assignment/ Group items tagged nytimes

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
S C

The Enduring Consequences of Unemployment - NYTimes.com - 0 views

economix.blogs.nytimes.com/...g-consequences-of-unemployment

consequences unemployment nytimes

shared by S C on 17 Jan 13 - No Cached
  • People who lose jobs, even if they eventually find new ones, suffer lasting damage to their earnings potential, their health and the prospects of their children
  • workers who lost jobs during the recession of the early 1980s were making 20 percent less than their peers two decades later
  • Losing a job also is literally bad for your health
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • worker laid off at age 40 could expect to die at least a year sooner than his peers.
  • when parents lose jobs. The study followed the earnings of 39,000 Canadian fathers and sons over 30 years beginning in the late 1970s. The study found the sons of men who lost their jobs eventually earned about 9 percent less than the sons of otherwise comparable workers
  • each day without work is a day without income, a drain on savings, an increased chance of default on debts
  • people who can’t find work become more likely as time marches on to suffer from depression and other health problems
  • there is some evidence that unemployment itself makes it harder to find new work, because unused knowledge and skills tend to atrophy
  • study found that unemployed people gradually lost the ability to read
  • S C on 17 Jan 13
     
    Unemployment itself has negative effects on people besides the obvious ones of having less money. People are more likely to become depressed, less likely to retain learned skills and it may even affect their children's earnings.
A SN

The Wrong Inequality - NYTimes.com - 2 views

www.nytimes.com/...ooks-the-wrong-inequality.html

Article Regarding the Topic of Inequality

shared by A SN on 21 Nov 12 - No Cached
  • Blue Inequality
    • A SN
      A SN on 21 Nov 12
       
      One type of inequality.
  • Red Inequality
  • It’s between those with a college degree and those without.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Roughly 31 percent started or manage nonfinancial businesses. About 16 percent are doctors, 14 percent are in finance, 8 percent are lawyers, 5 percent are engineers and about 2 percent are in sports, entertainment or the media.
  • people similar to yourself, who may have gone to the same college, who are earning much more while benefiting from low tax rates, wielding disproportionate political power, gaining in prestige and contributing seemingly little to the social good.
  • New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Dallas, Houston and the District of Columbia.
  • Moreover, college graduates have become good at passing down advantages to their children. If you are born with parents who are college graduates, your odds of getting through college are excellent. If you are born to high school grads, your odds are terrible.
  • more likely to get married, they are much less likely to get divorced and they are much, much less likely to have a child out of wedlock. Today, college grads are much less likely to smoke than high school grads, they are less likely to be obese, they are more likely to be active in their communities, they have much more social trust, they speak many more words to their children at home.
  • But the fact is that Red Inequality is much more important. The zooming wealth of the top 1 percent is a problem, but it’s not nearly as big a problem as the tens of millions of Americans who have dropped out of high school or college. It’s not nearly as big a problem as the 40 percent of children who are born out of wedlock. It’s not nearly as big a problem as the nation’s stagnant human capital, its stagnant social mobility and the disorganized social fabric for the bottom 50 percent.
  • That’s because the protesters and media people who cover them tend to live in or near the big cities, where the top 1 percent is so evident
  • If your ultimate goal is to reduce inequality, then you should be furious at the doctors, bankers and C.E.O.’s. If your goal is to expand opportunity, then you have a much bigger and different agenda
  • A SN on 21 Nov 12
     
    Questions 1. Why does this article relate to economics? Honestly, why should we as economists really care about this matter? 2. Inequality is not only found in America, so how can American inequalities be compared to other inequalities found in the world? (This can include gender, race, geographical location, history, and more)
  • Valentina Padure on 28 Nov 12
     
    1. This article relates to economics because it discusses red and blue inequalities that exist and these are economic principles that economists need to pay attention to. The economy is based on efficiency and in order to be efficient economists have to take into consideration all types of inequalities that exist 2. An inequality is an unequal difference between two things, this article recognizes the inequality between the rich and the poor, or as they call it the red and blue inequality. Another type of inequality is gender inequality. In some countries girls are not allowed to go to school with the boys, and girls typically don't have the same rights as boys.
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20▼ items per page