Group items tagged

Questions 1. Why does this article relate to economics? Honestly, why should we as economists really care about this matter? 2. Inequality is not only found in America, so how can American inequalities be compared to other inequalities found in the world? (This can include gender, race, geographical location, history, and more)

1. This article relates to economics because it discusses red and blue inequalities that exist and these are economic principles that economists need to pay attention to. The economy is based on efficiency and in order to be efficient economists have to take into consideration all types of inequalities that exist 2. An inequality is an unequal difference between two things, this article recognizes the inequality between the rich and the poor, or as they call it the red and blue inequality. Another type of inequality is gender inequality. In some countries girls are not allowed to go to school with the boys, and girls typically don't have the same rights as boys.

The article talks about how inequality may have decreased worldwide but it is increasing more and more in specific countries, Canada has fairly high inequality and there are propositions to tax the rich or redistribute income using other strategies. 

1) What do you think are possible solutions for the rising inequality? 2) Since the rich are taking a higher percent of overall income and Canada is in debt, do you agree with lowering their taxes?

This article talks about how the government is doing very good with reducing the inequality with the tax cuts and all but that they could be more aggressive. It's suggesting that we need a new redistribution plan but mainly focuses on what it counts to be the most important thing in getting rid of the debt, the governments role in all this. Asks questions like what if the government had made different decisions. 

There is a widening gap in terms of inequality in Canada and it goes on to say that its being blamed on tax cuts for such inequalities, the article goes on to state that the inequality may be the reason for the province to be facing this growing poverty. 

Q1: What would be your solution to this inequality? Would it really affect people(help teachers; students; any consequences)? Q2: Would your choice be efficient to the state? What would be opportunity costs for your solution?

1. my solution to this inequality would be to increase taxes on the wealthy and decrease for the poor and focus the use of taxes more on public schools because that's where it's needed most. Since the problem isn't really about the taxes, it's the rich people themselves and their attitude toward public services so there should be a policy where rich have to support at most, public schools. 2. Yes my choice would be efficient because this way you can at least reduce the wealth gap between the wealthy and poor. The main opportunity cost for my solution is paying more taxes but for a better result in education and basic necessities needed in schools for students to be educated properly.

The article talks about how income inequality is increasing in Canada. It talks about how the rich are getting a bigger income over the years then the poor. 

Discussion Questions: 1. Why should a widening financial income gap be concerning to the economy? 2. What are the economic differences of the baby boomer's generation (1940's-1960's) and the current generation? Do you think these differences affected the education requirement of today's jobs?

From the mid 1990's - late 2000's Canada had the fourth largest increase in income inequality among it's peers. Income inequality, along with corruption, were named as the two most serious challenges facing the world at this year's World Economic Forum in Davos. the impact of the growing income gap has gather little attention in Canada market forces and globalization are increasing disparity, along with institutional shifts such as dwindling unionization rates and stagnating minimum wages.

The average income that families in the bottom 20 per cent make from employment has decreased by 60 per cent since 1980, whereas the average earnings in the top 10 per cent has grown by 45 per cent. Using data from 23 countries, British economist Richard Wilkinson has linked inequality to 10 social indicators like life expectancy, teenage births, obesity, homicides, imprisonment and infant mortality rates.

The problems created by income inequality in Canada could possibly lead to a financial crisis. 

most people don't realize that income inequality effects us all and not just the poor. Our market-driven ideology has lead to the increasing income gap and needs to be changed. The reductions of income tax. Not only reductions of income tax and the disproportionate benefits to upper-income [individuals] takes away the money that's needed for post-secondary education, for health care, for Canada pensions, worsening the income gap.

Since the recession began in October 2008, only 179,000 jobs have been created. (In recent months 37,000 jobs have actually disappeared) 541,000 workers who have exited Canada's work force since the recession began. Roughly 700,000 seniors would suffer reduced incomes. The number of seniors below the poverty line would increase from 50,000 to 220,000- representing a more than doubling of Canada's poverty rate. Thirdly, past cuts to Canada's Employment Insurance (EI) program mean that only 39% of the officially unemployed are eligible to receive benefits. Another 860,140 unemployed people are barred from EI benefits and have to rely on provincial welfare or their families.

Most of the income gains of the past three decades, the report argues, were realized by only wealthy Canadians. The paper suggests that social and economic rights be added to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms alongside Canadians' political and civil rights, in order to fulfil its "security of the person" provision. For every dollar increase in national earnings over the last 20 years more than 30 cents have gone to the top one per cent while the remaining 70 cents have been shared across the other 99 per cent of Canadians. The final section of the report is prescriptive, outlining several ways to combat growing income equality: -Good jobs: changes to economic policies to promote the growth of middle-class jobs, including trade and foreign investment policies that protect labour rights and environmental standards and strong investments in child care, public education and skills training. -Income supports: changes to the government programs targeted at low-income Canadians and those in short-term need, such as employment insurance, Old Age Security, the Canada Pension Plan, provincial welfare systems and other income supports and tax benefits targeted at low-income families with children and the working poor. -Expanding public services: the report argues that for the majority of Canadians public services are a good deal; The value of education, health care, child care and other public services annually exceeds the taxes paid by middle-class and low-income Canadians. At the same time, some reforms are needed, it acknowledges. -Fair taxes: changes to Canada's tax system are necessary, it argues, pointing out Canada's taxes as a share of national income (31 per cent) are below the average of the world's industrialized countries (34 per cent), squeezing funding for public services.