Group items tagged

A good example for D2.4? Although in the document it says: we must stress that this document is neither a Functional Requirements nor a Technical Specifications document. It's unclear to me if such documents have been produced in the HOPE project and if they are accessible to us.

Also highly relevant since it specifies how proprietary metadata is transformed in a couple of stages into Europeana EDM as well as other service providers including Flickr. The only concern is that for HOPE it was clear from the beginning that a central service was delivered unlike EU-Inside.

Project Assets

Useful for inspiration of D2.4.

Highly relevent to D2.4. because there is quite some overlap although EUscreen also aggregates content.

Since we've aggreed to use UML in helping to put together the specifications, it's useful to reach aggrement on how far we go with this. The maturity level might be of help.

I guess this is deliverable describes the core of what Europeana is supposed to be. It is however over 2 years old, and the ideas have shifted somewhat.