In the short run, the Google Book Search settlement will unquestionably bring about greater access to books collected by major research libraries over the years. But it is very worrisome that this agreement, which was negotiated in secret by Google and a few lawyers working for the Authors Guild and AAP (who will, by the way, get up to $45.5 million in fees for their work on the settlement—more than all of the authors combined!), will create two complementary monopolies with exclusive rights over a research corpus of this magnitude. Monopolies are prone to engage in many abuses.
The Book Search agreement is not really a settlement of a dispute over whether scanning books to index them is fair use. It is a major restructuring of the book industry’s future without meaningful government oversight. The market for digitized orphan books could be competitive, but will not be if this settlement is approved as is.
Michael Baden-Campbell on 08 May 09Elsevier, in cooperation with some pharmaceutical companies, published over 5 journal-like entitities from 2000-2008. These "journals" were given names that sounded basically reputable, but were essentially reprints of works that appeared in other Elsevier journals and featured works that touted the benefits of drugs produced by these drug companies.
