Skip to main content

Home/ Ethics and Publishing/ Group items tagged personalization

Rss Feed Group items tagged

arnie Grossblatt

On the Web's Cutting Edge, Anonymity in Name Only - 0 views

  •  
    Amazing how much personal information one makes available by the simple act of browsing. 
Katie Freeman

One of Rupert Murdoch's U.K. tabloids goes on a crime spree. - By Jack Shafer - Slate M... - 0 views

  •  
    Murdoch's News of the World pays out $1.6 million in out-of-court settlements to silence people whose phones and personal information was hacked by reporters.
Amanda Straub

Tweeting Your Way Out of a Job - 0 views

  •  
    A little old, but still very relevant to the discussion of meshing personal and professional lives on the Internet.
Helen Nam

Revenge! - 0 views

  •  
    Benchmarkreviews.com reviews office equipment, and posts a review about a chair that sounds ... off. It turns out that the review lifts phrases and content from press releases about the chair. Benchmarkreviews responds by permanently banning the person investigating the plagiarism -- and publishing his real name, address and phone number.
Mark Schreiber

Consumer Watchdog Group Goes After Google - 0 views

  • “I think the fundamental problem with Google, and by extension Schmidt, is that they are first and foremost computer scientists that work in their own world where more data is better,” he said, discussing Google’s stance on privacy. “They don’t think about the consequences this will have on consumers’ personal privacy.”
arnie Grossblatt

Google's Gatekeepers - 0 views

  • “Right now, we’re trusting Google because it’s good, but of course, we run the risk that the day will come when Google goes bad,” Wu told me. In his view, that day might come when Google allowed its automated Web crawlers, or search bots, to be used for law-enforcement and national-security purposes. “Under pressure to fight terrorism or to pacify repressive governments, Google could track everything we’ve searched for, everything we’re writing on gmail, everything we’re writing on Google docs, to figure out who we are and what we do,” he said. “It would make the Internet a much scarier place for free expression.” The question of free speech online isn’t just about what a company like Google lets us read or see; it’s also about what it does with what we write, search and view.
  • Google, which refused to discuss its data-purging policies on the record, has raised the suspicion of advocacy groups like Privacy International. Google announced in September that it would anonymize all the I.P. addresses on its server logs after nine months. Until that time, however, it will continue to store a wealth of personal information about our search results and viewing habits — in part to improve its targeted advertising and therefore its profits. As Wu suggests, it would be a catastrophe for privacy and free speech if this information fell into the wrong hands.
  • If your whole game is to increase market share, it’s hard to do good, and to gather data in ways that don’t raise privacy concerns or that might help repressive governments to block controversial content.”
  •  
    Can Google continue to "Not be evil" and dominate the global market for search and user-generated content (YouTube, Blogger). Discussed how Google balances among free speech and privacy, the censorship demands of governments and its financial interests.
arnie Grossblatt

Beware online "filter bubbles": Eli Pariser on TED.com - 0 views

  •  
    We need "embedded ethics" in search algorithms.
Lindsey Schauer

Gene Weingarten: How 'branding' is ruining journalism - 0 views

  •  
    I am honored that you have chosen me as the subject of your journalism school graduate thesis. At the behest of your instructor, you e-mailed me to ask how I've "built my personal brand over the years." I'm answering with this column.
1 - 10 of 10
Showing 20 items per page