Skip to main content

Home/ ENG 102 Convergence: Spring '14 (14909)/ Group items tagged requirements

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
shawna ford

https://nursingandhealth.asu.edu/programs/nursing/undergraduate/bsn/cepbsn - 0 views

nursingandhealth.asu.edu/...cepbsn

ASU prerequisite requirements nursing [wp 1]

shared by shawna ford on 07 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • ASU prerequisite requirements: BIO 201, BIO 202, CHM 101, PGS 101 or CDE 232, MIC 205/206, ENG 101 and 102, HCR 240, and the math requirement (MAT 117, 142, or higher). Students must have a 3.25 or higher GPA in these courses to be eligible for consideration.
  • shawna ford on 07 Feb 14
     
    "ASU prerequisite requirements: BIO 201, BIO 202, CHM 101, PGS 101 or CDE 232, MIC 205/206, ENG 101 and 102, HCR 240, and the math requirement (MAT 117, 142, or higher). Students must have a 3.25 or higher GPA in these courses to be eligible for consideration."
Maelani Parker

Poor housing can destroy a child's future, says Lisa Harker | Society | The Guardian - 0 views

www.guardian.co.uk/...ment.guardiansocietysupplement

family decline research mcc eng102 wp1 health housing wp2

shared by Maelani Parker on 26 Aug 12 - No Cached
  • News Society Second thoughts Home truths Poor housing can destroy a child's future, says Lisa Harker Share 3 Email Lisa Harker The Guardian, Tuesday 12 September 2006 Britain is hooked on housing. Queues snake round DIY retail parks each weekend, and TV schedules are saturated with home makeover shows. But there is one area where the appetite for all things housing appears to have stopped short.While the government's Every Child Matters programme for child welfare picks out health, safety, economic well-being, making a positive contribution, enjoying and achieving as the critical factors that shape children's lives, there is no explicit recognition of the role that housing plays - despite the fact that more than a million children in Britain are living in poor housing.That figure will come as no surprise to professionals working at the sharp end of the housing crisis, but whether the scale of the problem is grasped by those shaping public policy is far from clear.Earlier this year I was commissioned by Shelter, the housing and homelessness charity, to undertake a comprehensive review of research examining the impact of bad housing on children's future chances. The resulting report, Chance of a Lifetime, published today, documents the powerful influence of poor housing on children's lives and shows how its destabilising impact is felt long into adulthood.
  • Earlier this year I was commissioned by Shelter, the housing and homelessness charity, to undertake a comprehensive review of research examining the impact of bad housing on children's future chances. The resulting report, Chance of a Lifetime, published today, documents the powerful influence of poor housing on children's lives and shows how its destabilising impact is felt long into adulthood.
  • On every aspect of life - mental, physical, emotional, social and economic - living in bad housing can hand children a devastating legacy. Studies show that poor housing can lead to a 25% higher risk of experiencing severe ill-health and disability before they reach middle age. In particular, such children face a greater chance of developing meningitis, infections, asthma or other respiratory problems
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • It can also have a devastating impact on emotional wellbeing. Research shows that homeless children are three to four times more likely to have mental health problems than other children
  • How can a homeless child flourish when they are two to three times more likely to be absent from school and become used to watching their no more able, but well-housed, contemporaries leapfrog their progress? How can a child develop healthily when their home is cold and damp, their chest hurts when they breathe, and they can't sleep at night, as one girl described her experience of living in a house where the heating does not work?
  • Maelani Parker on 26 Aug 12
     
    Where a child is required to make their home has a lasting effect on their health and their well-being. This carries into society and has an effect there as well.
Billy Gerchick

Polldaddy.com - 3 views

polldaddy.com/

surveys polls wgr5 mcc eng102 research journalism primaryresearch polldaddy

shared by Billy Gerchick on 28 Sep 12 - Cached
  • Billy Gerchick on 28 Sep 12
     
    Outstanding survey site; useful for building on WGR chapter 5. Also, using this can fulfill primary research requirements for the WP2.
williamgreer

Barefoot v. Estelle - 463 U.S. 880 (1983) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center - 1 views

supreme.justia.com/...case.html

shared by williamgreer on 05 Mar 14 - No Cached
  • One of the questions submitted to the jury, as required by a Texas statute, was whether there was a probability that the petitioner would commit further criminal acts of violence and would constitute a continuing threat to society. In addition to introducing other evidence, the State called two psychiatrists, who, in response to hypothetical questions, testified that there was such a probability. The jury answered the question, as well as another question as to whether the killing had been deliberate, in the affirmative, thus requiring imposition of the death penalty. On appeal, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected petitioner's contention that such use of psychiatric testimony at the sentencing hearing was unconstitutional, and affirmed the conviction and sentence.
  • williamgreer on 05 Mar 14
     
    Information on the Barefoot V. Estelle Supreme Court case of 1983
Lindsey Venetos

Opposing Viewpoints in Context - Document - 0 views

ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.pvc.maricopa.edu/...ViewpointsDetailsWindow

WP#2

shared by Lindsey Venetos on 09 Mar 14 - No Cached
    • Lindsey Venetos
      Lindsey Venetos on 09 Mar 14
       
      one of my primary sources
  • to a Group-------------------ENG 102 Convergence: Spring '14 (14909)(shared)-------------------Create a Group... Share my existing annotations
  • If passed, Senate bill S. 344 would require U.S. Supreme Court proceedings to be televised except in cases where it is deemed harmful.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • This legislation would increase the public's awareness and understanding of how the nation's highest court works
  • It decides by 5-to-4 decisions so many vital cases, including partial-birth or late-term abortion, deciding who will live. It decides the question of who will be elected, controlling the constitutional decision on campaign contributions. It decides the constitutionality—
  • The Supreme Court of the United States, again in a series of 5-to-4 decisions, has decided what is the power of Congress, declaring in U.S. v. Morrison [2000] the legislation to protect women against violence unconstitutional because the Court questioned our "method of reasoning," raising a fundamental question as to where is the superiority of the Court's method of reasoning over that of the Congress. But that kind of decision, simply stated, is not understood.
  • Justice Stevens has been quoted recently stating his favorable disposition to televising the Supreme Court. Justice Breyer, during his confirmation hearings in 1994, indicated support for televising Supreme Court proceedings. He has since equivocated, but has also noted that it would be a wonderful teaching device. In a December 13, 2006, article by David Pereira, Justice Scalia said he favored cameras in the Supreme Court to show the public that a majority of the caseload involves dull stuff. In December of 2000, an article by Marjorie Cohn noted Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's support of camera coverage, so long as it is gavel to gavel—which can be arranged.
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20▼ items per page