Skip to main content

Home/ EMCC VCP 2016/ Group items tagged instead

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Eric N

Should You Convert Your Photos to DNG? - 1 views

photographyconcentrate.com/should-you-convert-dng

DNG AVCP

shared by Eric N on 24 Sep 15 - No Cached
  • formats might be difficult to read in the
  • distant future since the format hasn’t been openly documented and support
  • Since the DNG format (.dng) is open source anyone can write software to read or write the format.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • from the manufacturer may not always be there.
  • There are also no license restrictions so camera manufacturers could use DNG as their default RAW format instead of their proprietary format.
  • DNG files are around 15-20% smaller in file size than proprietary RAW files without any loss of quality!
  • The DNG format includes a checksum that can detect file corruption
  • might not be necessary.
  • you can’t accidentally make adjustments that change the original file (the way you can with JPEGs).
  • Noah K on 24 Sep 15
     
    this is a really good article on the pros of converting to DNG after reading a couple of other websites about the pros and cons of converting to DNG i decided that i was pro and i think that this artical sums up the pros in a pretty simple and easy to understand way.
  • ...1 more comment...
  • Abi B on 24 Sep 15
     
    Dammit i chose the same article!
  • Jordyn B on 24 Sep 15
     
    I think that this article agrees with the process of converting your photos to DNGs. I highlighted main points made by the author, but basically he listed many reasons why we should convert our photos to DNGs. One of the reasons I think would be the main reason I would convert my photos would be because I could would be able to open my photos in a lot of different softwares, not just Adobe softwares. It would be brilliant if camera manufacturers could use DNG instead of the RAW format. #proDNG
  • Eric N on 25 Sep 15
     
    The benefits of DNG makes me personally want to change my work flow. DNG is universal, smaller in size, and is adjustable like an ordinary raw file. Unlike Canon, Sony, and Nikons proprietary RAW formats. DNG is universal and I've seen it used for video and photo. Id make the switch.
ravenpierson17

Retired Baseball Star Credits Meditation for Home Runs - 0 views

www.mindbodygreen.com/...-Meditation-for-Home-Runs.html

meditation instead of steroids

shared by ravenpierson17 on 30 Apr 15 - No Cached
  • ravenpierson17 on 30 Apr 15
     
    Shawn Green hit 328 home runs when he played major league baseball in the 1990s and 2000s. During this era many of the league's power-hitters used steroids, but Green says he used meditation to hit home runs.
Sarah V

DNG vs RAW - 1 views

photographylife.com/dng-vs-raw

bcvm photography dng raw

shared by Sarah V on 22 Sep 15 - No Cached
  • Olivia N on 22 Sep 15
     
    This article does more than give one opinion, this article describes all the positives and negatives of using dng files or using raw files. This article gave more than enough information about dng and raw file formats. But in the end this article made a case for the use of dng files instead of raw files for so many different reasons that i agree with; ideas like dng files are more compatible simpler to deal with and the size of the files are smaller.
  • Sarah V on 24 Sep 15
     
    This article has both sides of the argument. DNg I still think is better because you can open the dng file in any format.
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20▼ items per page