Andy Carvin:When you get caught up in the hype, it’s easy to forget a very basic
axiom: if you’re going to make a fundamental shift in how students and
teachers access technology, you better be prepared to make lots of
other fundamental shifts in how you assess and teach students.
For one thing, those standardized tests used as bellwethers of
progress aren’t crafted to assess the kinds of learning that take place
with certain technologies. Laptops bring four big opportunities to the
table: opportunities for equal access, mobility, individual creativity
and for collaboration. Many of these laptop programs focus a lot on the
first opportunity - promoting equal access - and bless their hearts for
it. But unless educators are in a position to embrace and encourage the
other three, you’re missing out on most of the benefits that can come
from a laptop program.
I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve seen students using
their laptops in the classroom as if nothing else had changed, lined up
in neat rows, each laptop on a desk, with students listening to a
teacher lecture or taking a test on the laptop. Those aren’t laptops -
those are expensive pencils. Of course you’re not going to see
achievement improve when pedagogical practices aren’t rethought from
the ground up! Where is the boldness, the pedagogical imagination
required to put these devices to use to reach their teaching potential
- and students’ learning potential, for that matter?
Contents contributed and discussions participated by Ole C Brudvik
1 - 17 of 17
Showing 20▼ items per page

Ole C Brudvik
I am an educational technologist and work as an Adviser at the Department of Education, Akershus County Council, Norway. My work here involves mapping the use of learning technologies in the counties 34 schools, develop, implement and evaluate pedagogical ICT solutions in the schools, producing an...