Skip to main content

Home/ EDU 303 Computers and Technology in Education/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Britni Dunlap

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Britni Dunlap

Britni Dunlap

Laws, Acts, and Legislation - 5 views

  • State employees and employees of state institutions of higher education
  • Police and fire department supervisors
  • Contract employees and employees of regional councils of government
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • Rights of public employees
  • Open shops
  • Subjects for collective bargaining
  • Collective bargaining agreement provisions and approval
  • Conflicting provisions of agreements
  • School districts, educational service centers, community schools, and STEM schools
  • Dispute resolution procedures, strikes, and unfair labor practices
  • Public employee pay
  • Public employee benefits
  • Reduction in the public sector work force
  •  
    I think this bill is wrong. Especially with the taking away of the collective bargaining rights. Teachers will no longer be able to negotiate about pay, class size, etc. What are teachers supposed to do? How do you feel about these options being taken away?
Britni Dunlap

Senate Bill 5 could drastically change landscape for teachers, school districts | cleve... - 9 views

  • taking away the right to strike, pegging salaries and layoff decisions to performance, and increasing health care payments for many workers.
    • Britni Dunlap
       
      This bill allows layoffs to be more probable. They will also have to pay more for their health care. What do you as a future teacher think about this?
  • State organizations representing school boards and administrators also support the bill, saying it gives districts the flexibility they need to deal with looming state budget cuts.
  • End mandating automatic step increases in teacher salaries.
    • Britni Dunlap
       
      This causes teachers to have their salaries decreased and their pay raises taken away. This means that pay raises aren't necessarily given to everyone that deserves it. How does this make you feel?
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Stop requiring that layoffs be based solely on seniority.
  • Make it easier to fire unmotivated or incompetent teachers.
    • Britni Dunlap
       
      I think this statement could be a good part of the bill. I think our teachers need to be motivated and excited about teaching. If our teachers aren't excited about teaching, how can we expect our students to be excited about learning?
Britni Dunlap

Ohio's Senate Bill 5 will bring dramatic changes | cleveland.com - 3 views

  • a collective-bargaining bill that dramatically reduces the power of some 350,000 unionized public workers, including teachers, police officers and firefighters.
  • Collective bargaining: Restricts collective bargaining to wage issues. Under the former law, public workers had a right to collectively bargain for wages, benefits such as health care and pensions and specific workplace conditions, including staffing levels at fire stations or building assignments for teachers. Under the new law most public workers will be able to bargain only on their pay.
  • Safety equipment: Allows police and fire officials to negotiate for safety equipment. This is an exception to the above provision, which was added by the House. It concerns only equipment directly related to the safety of the officer or firefighter, like bulletproof vests and shields. It does not include other equipment, such as computers in squad cars.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • Traffic tickets: Prohibits linking patrol officer evaluations to how many citations they write. Patrol officers in some police agencies and the state highway patrol were evaluated and given pay increases, in part, according to how many traffic violations they issued to motorists. That can no longer be a basis for performance evaluation under the new law.
  • Health care: Requires public workers to pay at least 15 percent of their health care coverage. The goal here is to force unionized workers to pay more for their health care costs and thereby lower that expense for local and state governments. Supporters of the law say that private sector workers on average pay about 23 percent of their health care costs.
  • • Merit-based pay for teachers: Ohio's 146,000 primary and secondary school teachers will be evaluated largely based on how their students did on standardized testing along with other more subjective criteria. By April 1 of each year, teachers would be evaluated based on their students' test scores, their licensure level, whether they had achieved "highly qualified" teaching status, at least two 30-minute or more observations of them by administrators as well as other criteria selected by local school boards. Decisions about which teachers are laid off or fired and what kind of pay they would receive would be based on this evaluation process.
  • Pension pickups: Ohio governments cannot offer so called "pension pickups" where the governmental unit pays a portion of the 10 percent employees are supposed to contribute to their pensions. The law does not raise the employee contributions above the standard 10 percent, nor does it reduce the contribution levels of the state as an employer. However, a pension reform bill being considered in the House does increase contributions levels for pensions for teachers, police officers, firefighters and state highway patrolmen. Once again, it is not a part of SB 5.
  • Binding arbitration: Eliminates binding arbitration and creates an alternative allowing contracts in some cases to go to voters if they cost more. If governmental employees in a union cannot reach an agreement with management on a new contract, a fact-finder must be appointed to make recommendations. If a majority of the union members or management reject the fact-finder's recommendations, the legislative body that oversees the government workers (a city council, for example) must hold a vote within 30 days of the current contract expiring to choose between the "last, best" offers of the union and management. If the legislative body chooses to do nothing, the last best offer of management becomes the new contract. In cases where the higher-cost offer is selected by the legislative body, the chief financial officer of the governmental body determines whether new revenue is needed to fulfill the offer that has been chosen. If so, there is a procedure by which signatures can be collected and both "last best" offers placed on the ballot for voters to chose between.
  • Decertification: Makes it easier to end union representation by lowering the percentage of workers needed to trigger such a move. In the past, a majority of employees was needed to back a petition to decertify a union. Now, a vote by only 30 percent of workers is needed.
  • Payroll deductions: Prohibits any public employer from providing a payroll deduction for contributions to a union political action committee without first having written permission from the employee.
  • Dues: Employees who do not want to join a union -- but nonetheless still receive the same wages and benefits spelled out in the union contract -- no longer have to pay "fair share" dues. Fair-share dues are based only on the cost of bargaining a contract and are less than full dues.
  • Strikes: Prohibits public union workers from striking, though workers who strike illegally will not be subjected to jail time because lawmakers dropped proposed contempt of court penalties from an earlier version of the bill.
  •  
    I find it unfair for public workers to pay at least 15% of their heath care just to lower that expense for local and state governments. Teachers will be paid depending on how well their students do on standardized testing. What happens if you have students who are differently abled in your classroom? What if there are students included in your section that you don't even teach? How can you be held accountable for the scores of students who you don't even teach? How can we be paid depending on student test scores when not all students are good test takers? I think a test/assessment does not show everything that a child has learned. I feel this is unfair to teachers. Yes, there are other aspects to deciding on pay but this is a huge part of it.
Britni Dunlap

Fight over SB 5 Moves to Ohio House;BROpponents Vow to Put Issue on Ballot - 5 views

  • dramatically curtail collective bargaining rights for public employees in the state
  • state and local government employees would be limited to negotiating only on issues related to wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment. Public employees also would be prohibited from striking under the bill, which creates a new contract dispute resolution process that involves elected officials.
  •  
    Are there other ways instead of striking that teachers can fight for their rights?
Britni Dunlap

SB 5 | StateImpact Ohio - 4 views

  • It limits collective bargaining for public employee unions. That means police officers, firefighters, teachers, and  other state employees cannot negotiate for their wages, though they can still bargain for some benefits such as health care and pensions.
    • Britni Dunlap
       
      This is frustrating to me because what would happen if you had been teaching for 30 years in a school district and they just decided to offer the same pay to every teacher. Now you are being paid the same as a first year teacher. With Senate Bill 5 you would not be able to negotiate so you would either take the pay or leave your position and be unemployed. How would this make you feel? Is it fair for a school district to offer something like this?
  • Prohibit public employees from striking;
    • Britni Dunlap
       
      How is it fair for employees to have to work in conditions that are unacceptable and don't meet our expectations? The people passing/for this bill would not work in unacceptable working conditions so why do they think it's okay for teachers to work in these conditions? Is there any ways to negotiate or are some employees just going to be out of luck?
  • Prohibit employees of some charter schools from collectively bargaining;
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Permit public employers to not bargain on subjects affecting wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment;
  • Prohibit most public schools from entering into collective bargaining agreements that do certain things, such as establishing maximum class sizes;
    • Britni Dunlap
       
      So is this saying that future teachers may have even larger class sizes than they do today? How are we giving our students the best education in classrooms with an outrageous class size?
  • Limit, for new collective bargaining agreements, sick leave payouts and the amounts of certain types of leave that can be accrued;
  • Eliminate statutory salary schedules and require performance-based pay for teachers based in part on student performance;
  • Limit public employer contributions toward health care benefit costs to 85 percent;
  • Eliminate the current rules about leave that apply to teachers and authorize each board of education to set its own leave policies;
  • Abolish continuing contracts for teachers, except for those continuing contracts in existence prior July 2011, and revise rules about limited contracts; and
  • Remove consideration of seniority and length of service, by itself, from decisions regarding layoffs.
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page