Sustainable Development - The Real Cost of Fossil Fuel Subsidies - 0 views
-
Ihering Alcoforado on 01 Jun 12The Real Cost of Fossil Fuel Subsidies Fossil fuel subsidies are often regressive, with the wealthy benefiting more than the poor. Replacing consumption subsidies with targeted support for the poor reaches the people most in need while avoiding waste in the national budget. The biggest beneficiaries of fossil fuel subsidies are not the poor. In fact, studies show that many subsidies are regressive in nature. A recent IMF study of fossil fuel subsidies globally determined that the wealthiest 20 percent of the population gets a disproportionate 43 percent of the benefit from fossil fuel subsidies, while the poorest 20 percent gets only 7 percent. In fact, the poorest 60 percent of the population still doesn't get as much benefit as the wealthiest quintile. According to a compilation of estimates by international organizations, consumption subsidies reached US$1 trillion to US$1.2 trillion worldwide, consistent with McKinsey & Company's estimate of US$1.1 trillion. Those costs include: Fossil fuel subsidies: Estimated to cost between US$455 billion and US$485 billion. Water subsidies: Estimated at between US$200 billion and US$300 billion. Fisheries subsidies: Estimated at between US$10 billion and US$30 billion. There are better ways to provide assistance to the people who need it most that are also less expensive for the national budget. By one estimate, the cost of transferring US$1 to the poorest 20 percent of the population via gasoline subsidies is US$33. If countries instead shifted that funding to targeted support for the poor, the funding would help the people who need it most, rather than those who need it least. Similarly, consumption subsidies for water and electricity can be replaced by connection subsidies that are better targeted, since the poor account for the majority of those without access to basic services. Consumption subsidies exacerbate common-property problems. Global subsidies to fisheries, for example, are partly to blame for t