.suiteThat government 'must be congenial to the feeling and habits of the people' was linked to a normative principle in which habit and opinion were seen to be the very ground of morality. It was due to this conception of the sources of obligation and action, and not just as a matter of stability (as later nineteenth-century imperial policymakers would stress), that Burke argued in favor of a prior deference to Indian laws and customs.10 Burke enhanced this call for presumptive deference by invoking a reverent image of India's laws, institutions, and antiquity. This reverence for Indian civilization, however, would become the avowed target of reformers James Mill and Charles Grant in their influential accounts of Indian society and history. As Francis Hutchins has aptly shown, these writers sought to undermine the eighteenth-century view of India as a highly developed civilization (especially as depicted in the work of famed Orientalist William Jones and Scottish philosophical historian William Robertson) and replace it with an account that portrayed Indian society as exhibiting and promoting the most extreme forms of moral degradation. For both, tarnishing the prevailing assessments of India, was, paradoxically, the necessary ground upon which to formulate a more expansive and elaborate notion of a 'just rule'. t shirt lacoste pas cher [11] [11] Francis G. Hutchins, The Illusion of Permanence: British...suite11 James Mill, father of John Stuart Mill and leading figure among radical and utilitarian reformers in early nineteenth-century Britain, was employed by the EIC from?1819 to?1836. Mill's monumental The History of British India signalled a key shift in imperial ideology, and Mill himself, through his various theoretical writings and his prominent institutional position as Chief Examiner, became one of the most important intellectual influences in the shaping of Indian policy.[12] [12] James Mill, The History of British India, (1817), New Delhi,. polo lacoste pas cher ..suiteMill's History was a full-scale assault upon every claim made on behalf of the achievements of Indian arts, science, philosophy, and government. For Mill, this radical revaluation of Indian civilization was essential for determining the structure and purpose of imperial rule.[13] [13] J. Mill, The History of British India, op. cit. chemise lacoste pas cher , p. ?456. ...suiteTo break with the Orientalist philosophy of rule, one that was premised on insinuating itself into existing indigenous traditions, required the rejection of the Orientalist image of Indian civilization. In the new utilitarian account, Indian society was deemed to be corrupt and corrupting and thus an illegitimate basis upon which to build ideal governmental institutions.
started by xangle44556 on 18 Nov 14
[11] [11] Francis G. Hutchins, The Illusion of Permanence: British...suite11 James Mill, father of John Stuart Mill and leading figure among radical and utilitarian reformers in early nineteenth-century Britain, was employed by the EIC from?1819 to?1836. Mill's monumental The History of British India signalled a key shift in imperial ideology, and Mill himself, through his various theoretical writings and his prominent institutional position as Chief Examiner, became one of the most important intellectual influences in the shaping of Indian policy.[12] [12] James Mill, The History of British India, (1817), New Delhi,. polo lacoste pas cher ..suiteMill's History was a full-scale assault upon every claim made on behalf of the achievements of Indian arts, science, philosophy, and government. For Mill, this radical revaluation of Indian civilization was essential for determining the structure and purpose of imperial rule.[13] [13] J. Mill, The History of British India, op. cit. chemise lacoste pas cher
, p. ?456. ...suiteTo break with the Orientalist philosophy of rule, one that was premised on insinuating itself into existing indigenous traditions, required the rejection of the Orientalist image of Indian civilization. In the new utilitarian account, Indian society was deemed to be corrupt and corrupting and thus an illegitimate basis upon which to build ideal governmental institutions.