Disciplinary Literacy: What it Means and Why it Matters for Responsive Pedagogy - 3 views
http://www.reading.org/Libraries/Book_Supplements/Developing_Academic_Readers_CCSS_Supp... - 1 views
Shanahan on Literacy: Disciplinary Literacy is NOT the New Name for Content Area Reading - 3 views
Do we teach kids to hate writing? - 2 views
The Future of Reading and Writing is Collaborative | Spotlight on Digital Media and Lea... - 2 views
ReachingtheGoal-Chapters1-6.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 2 views
-
Study that asked university & college professors of entry-level classes if they found the CCSS applicable to their teaching work, and if so, to what extent. Social Studies DL info can be found on pp36-38 & pp42-45. Discussion starting on p94. p96: a large proportion of respondents along all course types found the Speaking and Listening strand to be applicable. Applicability ratings for non-literary reading & writing standards are very high, esp when ELA is combined with the literacy standards. "When asked if the standards as a whole are sufficiently challenging cognitively to prepare students for their classes, nearly 96% of respondents said they are, and at least some of those who responded "no" did so because they felt the standards are more challenging than they need to be, not insufficiently challenging. In responses to the question of whether the standards omit key knowledge and skills, nearly 84% responded no, they do not." CTE info on p98
Inside Teaching - 4 views
WNY Education Associates » Writing in Every Content Area - 5 views
Reading for Democracy: Preparing Middle-Grades Social Studies Teachers to Teach Critica... - 4 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 50
Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page