Skip to main content

Home/ Disciplinary Literacy/ Group items tagged Disciplinary Literacy

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Kristen McDaniel

Shanahan on Literacy: Disciplinary Literacy is NOT the New Name for Content Area Reading - 3 views

  •  
    Tim Shanahan has written a lot about disciplinary literacy, and this blog post does a GREAT job explaining the difference between DL and Content Area Reading in a succinct manner.
Kristen McDaniel

Elizabeth Birr Moje on "Disciplinary Literacy" and Reading Across the Content Areas - N... - 2 views

  • "Many years of experience have shaped my thinking about disciplinary/adolescent literacy," she says. "During my years as a regular classroom teacher, I routinely found myself frustrated with my inability to get kids to engage in reading and writing disciplinary texts. At the same time, I witnessed them reading and writing all sorts of texts on their own time, or for dramatic productions that I directed, so I knew that they would or could read or write when they had a purpose or an interest."
Emilie Amundson

Wisconsin State Superintendent's Adolescent Literacy Plan - 1 views

  •  
    Great foundational document for understanding Wisconsin's approach to adolescent and disciplinary literacy
Kristen McDaniel

Disciplinary Literacy: What it Means and Why it Matters for Responsive Pedagogy - 3 views

  •  
    Michael Manderino, Northern IL University
Kristen McDaniel

ReachingtheGoal-Chapters1-6.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 2 views

  •  
    Study that asked university & college professors of entry-level classes if they found the CCSS applicable to their teaching work, and if so, to what extent. Social Studies DL info can be found on pp36-38 & pp42-45. Discussion starting on p94. p96: a large proportion of respondents along all course types found the Speaking and Listening strand to be applicable. Applicability ratings for non-literary reading & writing standards are very high, esp when ELA is combined with the literacy standards. "When asked if the standards as a whole are sufficiently challenging cognitively to prepare students for their classes, nearly 96% of respondents said they are, and at least some of those who responded "no" did so because they felt the standards are more challenging than they need to be, not insufficiently challenging. In responses to the question of whether the standards omit key knowledge and skills, nearly 84% responded no, they do not." CTE info on p98
1 - 20 of 42 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page