Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

The discussion feature is called the “stream” and Paul said it resembles Google Plus.

Students submit their annotations via their smart phones or other digital devices, and then analyze each other’s notations collectively.  They could be looking for main ideas, thematic and literary elements, or big ideas from the work.   They could be looking for evidence of connections to other texts, their own experiences, or world issues. They could simply be searching for meaning to support them when reading complex texts.

annotexting will allow students to engage with other audiences in tasks with an expanded purpose

In order to get students to own this process, we have to relinquish some control. Let them think, let them make mistakes and respond. Let them draw conclusions even they are not the conclusions we would have drawn. We can be there to coach them through misconceptions.

Devices should drive engagement, pique curiosity, and encourage creativity.

If teachers design the activity well, students will be too absorbed in what they're doing to be off task.

they had 20 minutes to complete the activity, which was enough time for them to accomplish the task without getting bored or wandering off task.

Students have more opportunities to learn from one another, and they begin to value their peers as resources in the classroom.

It's hard for me to imagine that devices are a distraction if students are challenged and engaged.

This collaboration makes it hard for a student to be off task because the group relies on each member to contribute to the final product.