Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Digital Gist
Rss Feed
Sort By: Most Recent | Popular Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Katie Day

Giles Slade: Eebs: A History of Future Publishing - 0 views

www.huffingtonpost.com/...istory-of-future_b_223747.html

ebooks kindle google future publishing

shared by Katie Day on 15 Sep 09 - Cached
  • The Kindle, on the other hand, is what you keep at home or take with you on vacation to relax into. It is for the book-lover who might occasionally buy a first, a signed or a special edition. It is lingerie. It is a box of chocolates or a bottle of double-malt. Especially well-timed for the recession as a luxury item that keeps on giving by allowing you to 'save' on cheaper electronic editions, it's now here to stay
  • According to the current growth curve, electronic books will dominate world-wide book sales by 2018. (This is the book industry's own prediction, and is extremely 'safe.' It does not anticipate a watershed or 'tipping point').
  • What I want to see is an e-Book that is no longer a simulacrum of a printed work. Soon, when people begin writing exclusively for eBooks, book metaphors like pagination will lose their functionality and fall away. But I also want the new medium to develop brand new possibilities. Maybe then, we will stop calling them e-Books and simply call them 'eebs.'
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The Kindle feature of reading itself aloud is a good beginning in expanding this new medium. In the future, I foresee hyperlinks that will break the reader out of the printed page and take him or her on a roller-coaster ride across the Internet during an accelerated and compressed 'knowledge-journey' [nahjer?] that would be impossible in a printed work. I don't know how long this will take, but I know it has to come.
  • Katie Day on 15 Sep 09
     
    <>
Katie Day

Some Thoughts on the Lost Art of Reading Aloud - NYTimes.com - 0 views

www.nytimes.com/...16sat4.html

reading reading_aloud books

shared by Katie Day on 15 Sep 09 - Cached
  • Katie Day on 15 Sep 09
     
    Digital devices can be used to have children record themselves reading aloud... e.g., on iPod Touches
  • Katie Day on 15 Sep 09
     
    musings on the importance of reading aloud
beth gourley

How the E-Book Will Change the Way We Read and Write - WSJ.com - 0 views

online.wsj.com/...SB123980920727621353.html

literacy e-books reading ebooks

shared by beth gourley on 15 Sep 09 - Cached
  • atest such moment came
  • Katie Day on 15 Sep 09
     
    Stephen Johnson on how he had an 'aha' moment with the Kindle and what he thinks is coming...
  • beth gourley on 17 Sep 09
     
    summary of different methods and formats required for ebooks.
Katie Day

The Long Decline of Reading | Mssv - 0 views

mssv.net/...the-long-decline-of-reading

reading literacy research future online digital books cognitive_science

shared by Katie Day on 15 Sep 09 - Cached
  • Katie Day on 15 Sep 09
     
    a long blog posting on reading and the culture of reading in our society today -- excellent overview -- including references to research and recent literature like Proust and the Squid....
beth gourley

Google & the Future of Books - The New York Review of Books - 0 views

www.nybooks.com/22281

google libraries accessibility books ebooks

shared by beth gourley on 17 Sep 09 - Cached
  • After lengthy negotiations, the plaintiffs and Google agreed on a settlement, which will have a profound effect on the way books reach readers for the foreseeable future.
  • The only workable tactic may be vigilance
  • When I look backward
  • ...46 more annotations...
  • The eighteenth century imagined the Republic of Letters as a realm with no police, no boundaries, and no inequalities other than those determined by talent
  • the Republic of Letters was democratic only in principle
  • dominated by the wellborn and the rich
  • the Republic of Letters suffered from the same disease that ate through all societies in the eighteenth century: privilege
  • Republic of Letters, as it actually operated, was a closed world, inaccessible to the underprivileged
  • invoke the Enlightenment in an argument for openness in general and for open access in particular.
  • the present, do we see a similar contradiction between principle and practice
  • Our republic was founded on faith in the central principle of the eighteenth-century Republic of Letters: the diffusion of light
  • For Jefferson, enlightenment took place by means of writers and readers, books and libraries—especially libraries,
  • The Founding Fathers acknowledged authors' rights to a fair return on their intellectual labor, but they put public welfare before private profit.
  • Twenty-eight years seemed long enough to protect the interests of authors and publishers
  • "the Mickey Mouse Protection Act," because Mickey was about to fall into the public domain), it lasts as long as the life of the author plus seventy years. In practice, that normally would mean more than a century.
  • When it comes to digitization, access to our cultural heritage generally ends on January 1, 1923, the date from which great numbers of books are subject to copyright laws.
  • for example, Sinclair Lewis's Babbitt, published in 1922, is in the public domain, whereas Lewis's Elmer Gantry, published in 1927, will not enter the public domain until 2022.
  • we would see that we live in a world designed by Mickey Mouse, red in tooth and claw.
  • professional journals sprouted throughout the fields,
  • he learned societies produced them, and the libraries bought them
  • Then commercial publishers discovered that they could make a fortune by selling subscriptions to the journals
  • the average price of a chemistry journal is $3,490
  • Fortunately, this picture of the hard facts of life in the world of learning is already going out of date.
  • Openness is operating everywhere, thanks to "open access" repositories of digitized articles available free of charge,
  • When businesses like Google look at libraries, they do not merely see temples of learning. They see potential assets or what they call "content," ready to be mined. Built up over centuries at an enormous expenditure of money and labor, library collections can be digitized en masse at relatively little cost
  • Libraries exist to promote a public good:
  • To digitize collections and sell the product in ways that fail to guarantee wide access would be to repeat the mistake that was made when publishers exploited the market for scholarly journals, but on a much greater scale,
  • You cannot legislate Enlightenmen
  • "Digitize we must." But not on any terms. We must do it in the interest of the public, and that means holding the digitizers responsible to the citizenry.
  • Yes, we must digitize. But more important, we must democratize.
  • By rewriting the rules of the game, by subordinating private interests to the public good, and by taking inspiration from the early republic in order to create a Digital Republic of Learning.
  • The settlement creates an enterprise known as the Book Rights Registry to represent the interests of the copyright holders
  • A "public access license" will make this material available to public libraries, where Google will provide free viewing of the digitized books on one computer terminal.
  • And individuals also will be able to access and print out digitized versions of the books by purchasing a "consumer license" from Google, which will cooperate with the registry for the distribution of all the revenue to copyright holders
  • Moreover, in pursuing the terms of the settlement with the authors and publishers, Google could also become the world's largest book business—not a chain of stores but an electronic supply service that could out-Amazon Amazon.
  • a single terminal will hardly satisfy the demand in large libraries.
  • a boon to the small-town,
  • The eighteenth-century philosophers saw monopoly as a main obstacle to the diffusion of knowledge
  • Google is not a guild, and it did not set out to create a monopoly.
  • a process that could take as much as two years—the settlement will give Google control over the digitizing of virtually all books covered by copyright in the United States.
  • We could have created a National Digital Library
  • It is too late now. Not only have we failed to realize that possibility, but, even worse, we are allowing a question of public policy—the control of access to information—to be determined by private lawsuit.
  • The district court judge will pronounce on the validity of the settlement, but that is primarily a matter of dividing profits, not of promoting the public interest.
  • As an unintended consequence, Google will enjoy what can only be called a monopoly—a monopoly of a new kind, not of railroads or steel but of access to information.
  • The settlement leaves Google free to negotiate deals with each of its clients, although it announces two guiding principles: "(1) the realization of revenue at market rates for each Book and license on behalf of the Rightsholders and (2) the realization of broad access to the Books by the public, including institutions of higher education."
  • What will happen if Google favors profitability over access?
  • it could also employ a strategy comparable to the one that proved to be so effective in pushing up the price of scholarly journals: first, entice subscribers with low initial rates, and then, once they are hooked, ratchet up the rates as high as the traffic will bear.
  • The payment will come from the libraries
  • the settlement creates a fundamental change in the digital world by consolidating power in the hands of one company
  • beth gourley on 17 Sep 09
     
    "How can we navigate through the information landscape that is only beginning to come into view? The question is more urgent than ever following the recent settlement between Google and the authors and publishers who were suing it for alleged breach of copyright."
« First ‹ Previous 61 - 77
Showing 20▼ items per page