Experts on reading difficulties suggest that for struggling readers, the Web may be a better way to glean information. “When you read online there are always graphics,” said Sally Shaywitz, the author of “Overcoming Dyslexia” and a Yale professor. “I think it’s just more comfortable and — I hate to say easier — but it more meets the needs of somebody who might not be a fluent reader.”
Contents contributed and discussions participated by Nick Currie
The Future of Reading - Literacy Debate - Online, R U Really Reading? - Series - NYTime... - 1 views
-
-
According to Department of Education data cited in the report, just over a fifth of 17-year-olds said they read almost every day for fun in 2004, down from nearly a third in 1984. Nineteen percent of 17-year-olds said they never or hardly ever read for fun in 2004, up from 9 percent in 1984. (It was unclear whether they thought of what they did on the Internet as “reading.”)
-
“Whatever the benefits of newer electronic media,” Dana Gioia, the chairman of the N.E.A., wrote in the report’s introduction, “they provide no measurable substitute for the intellectual and personal development initiated and sustained by frequent reading.”
- ...7 more annotations...
Discussion Board for the group - 28 views
-
I feel we already have a lot of information to make a strong statement. We should probably start writing something by tomorrow or Thursday afternoon. We need a good writer to do this and post it to this group so we can collaborate/edit it.
- ...1 more comments...
-
Yeah Post them
-
I just set everybody to Moderator so anyone in the group can edit the group
Technology and Literacy - 2 views
-
Grover J. Whitehurst, director of an institute within the Department of Education that helped to oversee the test, said he believed that the literacy of college graduates had dropped because a rising number of young Americans in recent years had spent their free time watching television and surfing the Internet.
-
We're seeing substantial declines in reading for pleasure, and it's showing up in our literacy levels," he said.
-
"We're seeing substantial declines in reading for pleasure, and it's showing up in our literacy levels." - Grover J. Whitehurst, director of an institute withing the Department of Education.
- ...1 more comment...
-
When people read books they are reading a piece of literature that has been edited by a credible publisher, When people go online for reading, sometimes they don't get the best material that is edited for literacy.
-
10 Cs: 96
Daily 7 - Texting Language and literacy - 1 views
-
publications & apps bookshop parents corner about us Subscriber Access Log inDaily7 Log inDaily10 English 繁體中文 簡體中文 한국어 日本語 English English 繁體中文 簡體中文 한국어 日本語 viewpoint Is the standard of children’s literacy declining because of texting or online social networking? 26.11.10 Mio Debnam replies: A number of surveys and research projects have been run over the past couple of years asking this very question. The results that have emerged have been very interesting, but before we look at them, let’s just have a brief look at the perceived problem: Do you think the standard of children’s literacy is declining because of texting or online social networking? It’s like they are using a different language!  Text messaging is now the world’s most popular form of communication (overtaking emails and even face-to-face conversation), with 5 trillion SMS messages sent worldwide in 2009. In addition to this, more than 65 million Twitter messages (or tweets) are sent daily, along with 4 billion messages on Facebook. Because users are limited to message
-
Because users are limited to messages of only 140 characters in length for Twitter and 160 characters for a text message, a whole new way of writing has emerged
-
Because users are limited to messages of only 140 characters in length for Twitter and 160 characters for a text message, a whole new way of writing has emerged – which involves foregoing punctuation and contracting words or using acronyms to save space
- ...12 more annotations...
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20▼ items per page
Technology has given birth to a whole new world and has evolved the way information can be received on a level never before imagined. With the national rising of Twitter and Facebook, we have seen large amounts of news spread and many visual aids, such as pictures and videos, which allow virtually anyone to play a role in the landscaping of the world. However, unintended consequences seem to have been brought upon by the digital age. It cannot be argued that a large amount of careers and individuals have been able to rise from this new era and some can even say dominate this new world. Even this rise can't take away from a very real problem in today's world. With the fast-paced world of the digital age, it is quickly becoming apparent that today's literacy levels are decreasing and in some cases at a very rapid level. Most affected by this increasingly illiterate world is the newest generation who are being born into it. Being literate means being able to understand ideas, both common and uncommon, to critically think about the ideas presented, and to form or reform ideas based on previous ones. Failing to have any of these three skills is the basis for illiteracy and results in lower literacy scores, lack of social competence and even violent tendencies.
I think any news site is going to be pretty credible especially the .edu's and the state news sites like nytimes.
Instead of;
Being literate means being able to understand ideas, both common and uncommon, to critically think about the ideas presented, and to form or reform ideas based on previous ones. Failing to have any of these three skills is the basis for illiteracy and results in lower literacy scores, lack of social competence and even violent tendencies.
Maybe something like:
Being literate means being able to read and write and being able to comprehend your reading and writing. Failing to have these skills is the basis for illiteracy and results in lower literacy scores, lack of social competence and sometimes violent tendencies.
What does everybody think.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/39147462/MLA-BIBLIOGRAPHY-FORMAT---PDF
Two of the sources were from the same page.
References
1. Kelley, Susanna. "texting-twitter-contributing-to-students-poor-grammar-skills-profs-say"
2. Wolpert, Stuart. "Is technology producing a decline in critical thinking and analysis? / UCLA Newsroom:"
3. Rich, Motko. "The Future of Reading - Literacy Debate - Online, R U Really Reading? - Series - NYTimes.com:"
January 15, 2014
This is from the instructions:
Include:
Cohesive group statement
Names of contributing team members
Links to articles, research, videos, etc.