Skip to main content

Home/ Digital Anthropology/ Group items tagged mobile phones

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Jovan Maud

Cell Phones in Papua New Guinea Used to Call Dead People | New Republic - 1 views

  • We often fret that we’re too attached to our smartphones or that we let them wield too much influence over our lives. But our reverence for technology is relative. In the remote Ambonwari society of Papua New Guinea, villagers believe that cell phones are extensions of their human owners and can be used to commune with the departed.
  • When their calls don’t go through, they don’t blame shoddy service or wrong numbers; they believe the spirits of the dead can interfere with their connections.
  • They haven’t had time to develop telephone etiquette have, either. Back in Slovenia, Telban’s phone rings nonstop. “They really love just to ring me,” he said. He never knows who’s calling, since villagers share the phones, and as soon as he answers, the other person hangs up: They don’t have enough credit for an actual conversation. But Telban doesn’t mind. “They are my friends,” he said. “They’re just saying hello.”
    • Jovan Maud
       
      Interesting point about phone etiquette, about cultural styles of using technology, and also how it might be the act of connecting, rather than communication per se, which is attractive to people.
  •  
    By the way, there is a whole special issue on mobile phones in The Australian Journal of Anthropology which has just been published. The research on which this article was based is on of them. The current link for an "early view" is here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1757-6547/earlyview
Jovan Maud

Why are we sleeping with our phones? | Anthropology in Practice, Scientific American Bl... - 1 views

  •  
    More on the curious intimacy of mobile phones in our lives and the role they play in mediating the distinction between "public" and "private".
Jovan Maud

Shoshanna Zuboff: Dark Google - 0 views

  • Google’s absolutist pursuit of its interests is now regarded by many as responsible for the Web’s fading prospects as an open information platform in which participants can agree on rules, rights, and choice.
  • In fact, the firms were developing a wholly new business logic that incorporated elements of the conventional logic  of corporate capitalism –especially its adversarialism toward end consumers – along with  elements from the new Internet world – especially its intimacy. The outcome was the elaboration of  a new commercial logic based on hidden surveillance.
  • We often hear that our privacy rights have been eroded and secrecy has grown. But that way of framing things obscures what’s really at stake. Privacy hasn’t been eroded. It’s been expropriated.  The difference in framing provides new ways to define the problem and consider solutions.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • A pre-modern absolutismFinally - and this is key - the new concentration of privacy rights is institutionalized in the automatic undetectable functions of a global infrastructure that most of the world’s people also happen to think is essential for basic social participation. This turns ordinary life into the daily renewal of a 21st century Faustian pact.
  • What is Google up to next?  We know it’s secret, but here is how it looks to me. Google is no longer content with the data business.  It’s next step is to build an even more radical „reality business.”  Google sees „reality” as the next big thing that it can carve up and sell. In the data business, the payoff is in data patterns that help target ads. In the reality business, the payoff is in shaping and communicating real life behaviors of people and things in millions of ways that drive revenue to Google. The business model is expanding to encompass the digital you as well as the actual you. The scene is changing from virtual reality to, well, reality. Unsurprisingly, the two entities at the vanguard of this new wave are Google and the NSA.
    • Jovan Maud
       
      Remember in the Matrix:Reloaded (I think it was?) that Neo realised he could also use his powers in the "real world", not just inside the Matrix...
  • In a 2011 paper,  MIT Professor Alex Pentland explains the value of reality mining. „We must reinvent societies’ systems within a control framework.” He notes that this will require „exponential growth in data about human behavior.”
    • Jovan Maud
       
      Bruno Latour would argue that the "the social" is becoming ever more "visible" and can be subjected to ever more quantatitive analysis. Or are we seeing a process of convergence, where the distinction between qualitative and quantitative is breaking down? The notion of developing a "control framework", though, illustrates though how the gathering of massive amounts of data is not merely collecting information about the world, but an active intervention in shaping the world.
  • the proliferation of sensors, mobile phones, and other data capture devices will provide the „eyes and ears” of a „world-spanning living organism.”
    • Jovan Maud
       
      "Distributed sensor networks" -- otherwise known as "the internet of things". 
  • “pattern of life analysis”
  • All this suggests that Google is building capabilities even more ambitious than reality „mining”. The aim is not merely the God’s eye view, but the God’s eye power to shape and control reality.
  • There are two useful ideas for us in the work of historian Karl Polanyi. He described the rise of a new human conception: the self-regulating market economy.  He saw that the market economies of the 19th and 20th centuries depended upon three astonishing mental inventions.  He called them „fictions“. The first was that human life can be subordinated to market dynamics and be reborn as „labor.” Second,  nature can be subordinated and reborn as „real estate.” Third, that purchasing power can be reborn as „money.”  The very possibility of industrial capitalism depended upon the creation of  these  three critical  „fictional commodities.” Life, nature, and exchange had to be turned into things that could be profitably bought and sold.
  • Google brings us to the precipice of a new development in the scope of the market economy. A fourth fictional commodity is emerging as a dominant characteristic of market dynamics in the 21st century. „Reality” is about to undergo the same kind of fictional transformation and be reborn as „behavior.” 
  • Polanyi understood that the pure unimpeded operations of  a self-regulating of the market were profoundly destructive. Society required    countermeasures to avoid such danger. He called this the „double movement”:  „a network of measures and policies...integrated into powerful institutions designed to check the action of the market relative to labor, land, and money.”
    • Jovan Maud
       
      When Horst and Miller discuss the "dialectics of culture" in their chapter, I think they are referring to something similar. How are the powers of abstraction brought about by digital technologies domesticated in "culture", or into structures of governance? 
  • We are beyond the realm of economics here. This is not merely a conversation about free  markets; it’s a conversation about free people.
  • But such specialized  professional arguments shift the Google debate from the realm of everyday life and ordinary people to the arcane interests of economists and bureaucrats. They obscure the fact that the issues have shifted from monopolies of products or services to monopolies of rights: rights to privacy and rights to reality.  These new forms of power, poorly understood except by their own practitioners, threaten the sovereignty of the democratic social contract.
Jovan Maud

Note to selfie: you're more than just a narcissist's plaything - 0 views

  •  
    A link from the Taylor piece I just shared.
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page