Skip to main content

Home/ DGL Assignment 2.4 Team B/ Group items tagged team

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Devin Davis

The Future of Reading - Literacy Debate - Online, R U Really Reading? - Series - NYTime... - 0 views

  • “Learning is not to be found on a printout,” David McCullough, the Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer, said in a commencement address at Boston College in May. “It’s not on call at the touch of the finger. Learning is acquired mainly from books, and most readily from great books.”
  • The simplest argument for why children should read in their leisure time is that it makes them better readers. According to federal statistics, students who say they read for fun once a day score significantly higher on reading tests than those who say they never do.
  • Reading skills are also valued by employers. A 2006 survey by the Conference Board, which conducts research for business leaders, found that nearly 90 percent of employers rated “reading comprehension” as “very important” for workers with bachelor’s degrees. Department of Education statistics also show that those who score higher on reading tests tend to earn higher incomes.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Critics of reading on the Internet say they see no evidence that increased Web activity improves reading achievement. “What we are losing in this country and presumably around the world is the sustained, focused, linear attention developed by reading,” said Mr. Gioia of the N.E.A. “I would believe people who tell me that the Internet develops reading if I did not see such a universal decline in reading ability and reading comprehension on virtually all tests.”
  • Nicholas Carr sounded a similar note in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” in the current issue of the Atlantic magazine. Warning that the Web was changing the way he — and others — think, he suggested that the effects of Internet reading extended beyond the falling test scores of adolescence. “What the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation,” he wrote, confessing that he now found it difficult to read long books.
  • Some scientists worry that the fractured experience typical of the Internet could rob developing readers of crucial skills. “Reading a book, and taking the time to ruminate and make inferences and engage the imaginational processing, is more cognitively enriching, without doubt, than the short little bits that you might get if you’re into the 30-second digital mode,” said Ken Pugh, a cognitive neuroscientist at Yale who has studied brain scans of children reading.
  • Web readers are persistently weak at judging whether information is trustworthy. In one study, Donald J. Leu, who researches literacy and technology at the University of Connecticut, asked 48 students to look at a spoof Web site (http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/) about a mythical species known as the “Pacific Northwest tree octopus.” Nearly 90 percent of them missed the joke and deemed the site a reliable source.
Ron Smith

About K12 | K12 - 3 views

  •  
    online learning for students  k-12. 
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    What did you find here that helps our argument?
  •  
    Please highlight material that supports our argument.
  •  
    This is just a website I found on the internet that shows education is provided on the NET. I haven't found any statistics so far about this program but I figured this could be something we could mention to prove the internet is a resourceful tool to learn.
  •  
    That's not what we're trying to prove at all. Perhaps you need to read the assignment again. We are supposed to be REFUTING the statement "Technology (through television, texting, Facebook posting, and the Internet) has contributed to an increase in literacy skills." We need bookmarks that support our side of the argument.
  •  
    Jeez what was I thinking....alright gimme a min I'll find something lol playing for the wrong team
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20 items per page