Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged cst

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Irene Jansen

Harper Government Announces Major New Investment in Health Care - 0 views

  • The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, today announced a major new investment in health care. The new investment in health care will see funding grow to record levels from $30 billion per year in 2013-14 to $38 billion per year in 2018-19, for a total investment of $178 billion in health care over the five-year period.
  • The Government also confirmed the Canada Social Transfer (CST) will continue to grow at its current rate of 3 per cent annually in 2014-15 and beyond, Equalization will continue to grow in line with gross domestic product, and Territorial Formula Financing (TFF) will continue to grow based on its current formula.
  • The CHT and CST will be reviewed again in 2024.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Federal-provincial-territorial officials will continue to review the technical aspects of Equalization and TFF to ensure the proper functioning of these programs. Upon renewal, both programs will be legislated out to 2018-19.
  • The Government has extended temporary total transfer protection another year to assist provinces and territories in transitioning through current economic challenges.
    • Irene Jansen
       
      Total Transfer Protection was introduced in December 2009. Quebec is the main beneficiary. This is over and above CHT and equalization.
Govind Rao

Improving medication safety for the elderly - Healthy Debate - 0 views

  • Maria’s story isn’t unusual. The vast majority of Canada’s seniors, 92%, live in private households. About one quarter of people 65 and older live alone. With increasing life expectancies, a greater number of people are living with several chronic and progressive medical conditions. Close to 15% of Canadians aged 65 and older also live with at least some cognitive impairment – difficulties with their memory or completing daily activities such as banking and cooking.
  • Within Canadian hospitals, Best Possible Medication Histories (BPMHs) are increasingly becoming the standard of care. The process of creating BPMHs, primarily led by hospital pharmacists, help reconcile patients’ medications. Hospital pharmacists engage in an intensive process to interview patients, review all medications from home, and contact all pharmacies patients use in order to develop definitive prescription lists. If there are discrepancies between the medications a patient takes and a list their pharmacies provide, the hospital pharmacist often offers recommendations to physicians about how to manage those inconsistencies.
  • Home care organizations are also beginning to explore different ways to harness the expertise of different health professionals. Pharmacists, for example, have a knowledge base about medications that goes beyond their traditional roles of filling prescriptions and providing basic patient education. They can play critical roles within the community to reconcile medications and offer strategies to minimize “pill burden.”
Irene Jansen

Days of blindly topping up medicare are over - The Globe and Mail - 0 views

  • Renegotiating the Canada Health Transfer – the mechanism Ottawa uses to transfer health-care dollars to the provinces – is a golden opportunity to send a message: The days of blindly shovelling money into health care are over.
  • The Canada Health Act
  • there is virtually no enforcement
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • During the spring federal election campaign, Prime Minister Stephen Harper effectively snuffed out debate on health funding by vowing to maintain the 6-per-cent escalator. He did not, however, say for how long, and has played his cards close to the vest since, aside from saying, intriguingly, that the feds will expect more accountability in exchange for the money in the future.
  • strict conditions on the CHT as a way of ensuring specific programs are undertaken
  • This was done in the 2004 health accord with wait times and was moderately successful.
  • The provinces have largely been saying that they want a repeat of 2004, when they got a 10-year deal with 6-per-cent increase per annum, and virtually no conditions on the money.
  • No one honestly believes that is going to happen, not at a time when most provinces are vowing to keep increases in health spending below 3 per cent a year, and least of all in the current economic conditions.
  • One possibility is extending the 2004 deal to 2016 which, not coincidentally, will be time for the next federal election.
  • Ottawa could buy time for its larger plan to radically revamp federal transfers to the provinces (including the CHT, CST and equalization.)
  • A second possibility is negotiating separate deals with each of the provinces and territories rather than one national accord.
  • Regardless of the direction negotiations take, the current formula, which is as convoluted as it is complex, is changing.
  • the cash portion each province receives varies because of the way equalization payments are calculated
  • In 2014, that will change so that cash is distributed on a per capita basis, without accounting for tax points. Practically, this will mean significantly more cash for Alberta and Ontario, and less for B.C. and Quebec.
  • Another hot issue, especially for the Atlantic provinces, is a desire to adjust the CHT to reflect demographics – namely that health-care delivery is more expensive in provinces with older populations, like those in Eastern Canada.This approach, known as needs-based funding, is already used by several provinces in calculating transfers to their regions.
  • Regional bickering will make it a lot easier for Ottawa to negotiate a deal (or deals). It’s in Mr. Harper’s interest to drag out the talks in the hope that the common front will crumble.
  • It’s also in the country’s interest that the Prime Minister and the premiers be willing to go out on a limb and fundamentally revamp health financing – starting at the top – because the current formulas aren’t working.
Irene Jansen

Welfare and health. slash health costs with same approach used for welfare. Financial P... - 0 views

  • The health-care crisis facing Canada today (along with its accordant costs) in many ways parallels the challenges facing Canada in the early 1990s regarding welfare dependency. The successful welfare reforms that gave the provinces the autonomy to innovate provide a model for reforming Canada's health care.
  • The 1995 federal budget restructured (and reduced) federal transfers to the provinces for social programs
  • The results were stunning. The number of Canadians receiving welfare declined from a peak of 3.1 million in 1994 to 1.7 million in 2009, up slightly from 1.6 million in 2008. As a percentage of the population, welfare recipients declined from a peak of 10.7% in 1994 to 5.1% in 2009.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The federal government should stabilize or even reduce the value of the Canada Health Transfer
  • the federal government should allow the provinces the maximum amount of flexibility to design, regulate and provide health care
  • - Jason Clemens is the director of research at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and author of the recently released Reforming the Canada Health Transfer.
Irene Jansen

Provinces angry as feds impose health plan that reduces payments after 5 years - Winnip... - 0 views

  • unprecedented, one-sided meetings
  • the majority of provincial and territorial leaders said the deal amounted to a take-it-or-leave-it offer that was slapped on the table without any chance of discussion
  • "We were expecting to discuss how we were going to discuss federal transfers,"
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Duncan and Bachand were joined at a post-meeting news conference by the finance ministers from Manitoba, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia, who all blasted the new transfer arrangement.
  • He said tying health transfers to the nominal rate of economic growth starting in 2017-2018 effectively removes $21 billion from health care funding across Canada.
  • B.C. Finance Minister Kevin Falcon said he's happy with the five-year plan.
  • "The process that we saw today where the federal government comes and says this is our non-negotiable position simply is not the way to build a nation," he said.
Irene Jansen

Shrewd tactics not same as good health policy - The Globe and Mail - 0 views

  • The gradual levelling off in growth ofhealth transfers is probably the best possible deal the provinces and territories – and Ottawa for that matter – could hope for. At least in base political terms.
  • But shrewd tactics and political palatability are not the same thing as good public policy. At a time when medicare needs leadership and vision, the new accord continues the lamentable tradition of thoughtlessly shovelling money at the status quo.
  • Jim Flaherty’s offer was this: Continuing the 6-per-cent annual increase in the Canada Health Transfer and 3-per-cent per annum hike in the Canada Social Transfer until the 2016-17 fiscal year; after that, until at least 2024, increases in the CHT will be tied to economic growth, while the CST will continue at 3 per cent.
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • the deal offered by Mr. Harper’s government is reasonable. It is fiscally responsible, tying spending increases to inflation
  • It is also politically astute, for a host of reasons:
  • * It avoids the sordid scene we saw in 2004 when provincial premiers ganged up on prime minister Paul Martin and extorted $41-billion in additional health dollars and a spendthrift 6-per-cent escalator clause on transfers.
  • * It is a 10-year deal, just as the provinces demanded, allowing some certainty in budgeting.
  • * It respects Mr. Harper’s election promise to maintain 6-per-cent increases beyond 2014 – at least nominally. (Those who wanted 6 per cent per annum were dreaming in Technicolor.)
  • * It puts the onus on the provinces to justify why health-care spending should exceed inflation, something they have never been able to do.
  • * It places no restrictions on how the provinces spend the $40-billion a year they receive in federal health transfers (along with another $20-billion in social transfers for education and welfare programs.)
  • It should be an instrument for improving health-care delivery, and in that regard, Mr. Flaherty’s offer fails miserably
  • What the public should expect from Ottawa is that federal funds be used to exercise leadership and foster innovation
  • The reason Ottawa transfers money to the provinces in the first place (because health is a provincial responsibility constitutionally) is to ensure some semblance of equity coast-to-coast-to-coast. But there are areas, such as catastrophic drug coverage and homecare, where there are gross regional disparities.
  • This accord will force the provinces to rein in health spending, which is not a bad thing in itself. But one of the consequences will likely be greater disparities in the quality of care and breadth of coverage between the have and have-not provinces.
  • The great failure here is not refusing to increase transfers by 6 per cent, it is failing to attach strings to the monies.
  • With this deal, Mr. Harper has shown himself to be politically astute and fiscally prudent, but he has failed to show a commitment to strengthening health care, and medicare more specifically.
Irene Jansen

Federal Support to Provinces and Territories. Finance Canada. - 1 views

  • Total Transfer Protection (TTP) provided in 2010-11 ($525 million), 2011-12 ($952 million) and 2012-13 ($680 million) ensuring that a province’s total major transfers in one of these years are no lower than in the prior year. For the purpose of calculating TTP, total major transfers comprise Equalization, CHT, CST and prior year TTP.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page