Skip to main content

Home/ CSC442B/ Group items tagged Internet Service Providers

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Jeffrey Kendall

Court Favors Comcast in F.C.C. 'Net Neutrality' Ruling - NYTimes.com - 0 views

    • Jeffrey Kendall
       
      I could understand the thoughth behind possibly wanting to slow down illegal downloads and make them less appealing to people but then to decide to slow down YouTube because it eats up bandwidth as well. At what point do they stop?
  • The decision will allow Internet service companies to block or slow specific sites and charge video sites like YouTube to deliver their content faster to users.
  • The court ruling, which came after Comcast asserted that it had the right to slow its cable customers’ access to a file-sharing service called BitTorrent,
  •  
    Anyone interested in net neutrality or the governments role in online regulation of service providers
Jeffrey Kendall

Court Favors Comcast in F.C.C. 'Net Neutrality' Ruling - NYTimes.com - 0 views

    • Jeffrey Kendall
       
      I don't see a reason why Google shouldn't be sharing some of the millions their making off of YouTube and Google video advertising with service providers considering the amount of resources they are taking up but I do not agree with comcast restricting access to the site as a secondary option.
  • The court’s ruling could potentially affect content providers like Google, which owns YouTube, a popular video-sharing service. Content providers fear that Internet service companies will ask them to pay a fee to ensure delivery of material like high-definition video that takes up a lot of network capacity.
  •  
    Second page to article previously posted on net neutrality and comcast's win over the FCC
erika webb

Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet - 0 views

  • The Economist also says Net Neutrality is a means to preserve openness, though the piece fairly outlines its many cons.  Without Net Neutrality, proponents of government regulation argue Internet service providers will create a closed Internet by blocking content or permitting some websites to ride on a “fast-lane” above others.  However, this, too, should be decided by consumer choice in the free market, not by prescriptive rules from the FCC that mandate extremely “open” business models.  Consumer preferences in the free-market alone have long ensured that ISPs do not block websites.  Additionally, prioritizing traffic helps prevent congestion, and the model of offering paid fast lanes is utlized by mostly “open” companies like Google to ensure their service is fast enough for consumers in places far from their servers.  Finally, paid prioritization would provide a new revenue source for ISPs to lower prices and invest in broadband expansion, speed, and other services – something that can be very good for consumers.  Net Neutrality and the FCC's lingering attempt at broadband reclassification could take all these potential benefits away.
    • erika webb
       
      I strongly believe that it should play out in the free market.
  •  
    Pros and cons of governemnt vs. private sector braodband access, net neutrality
  •  
    Article regarding public vs. government control over braodband access
Lucas Jockisch

How Egypt Pulled the Plug on the Internet - CBS Evening News - CBS News - 1 views

  • born on Facebook and other social networking sites - which led the government to cut off Internet service.
  • The Internet blackout was a surprising move for a nation previously known for being open - compared to other countries in the Mideast.
  • unprecedented is we've never seen such a connected country like Egypt be disconnected
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The Egyptian government told their Internet service providers to shut down
  • Congress is considering a bill to expand the president's authority.
  • the president would have the power to declare a cyber emergency
  •  
    Very interesting article about how the Egyptian Government pulled the plug. Also talks about legislation in the US Congress that would give the President authority to pull the plug on us.
Morgan Diffenderfer

Security Fix - FDA targets rogue Internet pharmacies - 0 views

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration is pressuring a number of Internet service providers to shut off nearly 12 dozen Web sites alleged to be selling counterfeit or unapproved prescription drugs.
  • sent 22 warning letters
  • selling phony pharmaceuticals, all without requiring a prescriptio
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • FDA targets rogue Internet pharmacies The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is pressuring a number of Internet service providers to shut off nearly 12 dozen Web sites alleged to be selling counterfeit or unapproved prescription drugs.
  • Valium and Xanax, to lifestyle drugs like Viagra and Levitra
  • Taking these drugs can pose a danger to consumers."
  • such as wellknowndrugs.com and 24-7meds.com
  • "This particular program has been around since at least 2006, and the drugs you get if you order from them all come from India
  •  
    Great for those pharmacies who are being shut down due to illigit scripts... Thanks to susan walker for helping me locate this wonderful article
Jeffrey Kendall

U.S. aid to spread broadband access criticized | The Columbus Dispatch - 0 views

    • Jeffrey Kendall
       
      Companies always complain about competition when it's too late and they've already missed the band wagon. These other companies have had chances even if it was small and incremental to make improvements to their broadband offerings and they chose not too. They also had an opportunity to bid for this stimulus money and unfortunately they did not receive it. If they had they would not be complaning right now.
    • Jeffrey Kendall
       
      this is similar to Googles plan to introduce gigabit service to smaller cities on a limited scale to see if the results are profitable. I will be interesting to see if these underdeveloped areas really do take advantage of this service or if it will be lost on them.
  • These local phone and cable companies fear that they will have to compete with governmentsubsidized broadband systems, paid for largely with stimulus dollars. If the taxpayer-funded networks siphon off customers by offering lower prices, private companies might be less likely to upgrade their lines, endangering jobs and undermining the stimulus plan's goals, they warn.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Many existing systems, they note, lack the capacity to meet mush rooming demand for bandwidth. The new, stimulus-funded networks will provide far more-robust connections - many of them offering speeds of up to 100 megabits or even 10 gigabits per second to schools, libraries and other "anchor institutions." That's 20 to 2,000 times faster than the DSL and cable wires linking most U.S. homes.
  •  
    Government stimulus attempt to bring broadband access to rural areas that have limited or no high speed internet access.
Andrew Clinton

Verizon Preparing Improved Voice Calls, Video Chat With 4G LTE Network - 0 views

  •  
    It is amazing how far phone services have come. The fact that you can download from 5 Mbps to 12 Mbps over you phone. That is faster than many high speed internet providers
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page