Any Tips for Setting Exit Multipliers? - 4 views

• 
  #1 daniel3112 on 27 Jul 25

   

  Timing the exit in Aviator feels like a guessing game, and I want to move beyond hoping for luck. Some players say early exits at around 1.5x protect your bankroll, while others recommend chasing higher multipliers for bigger wins. I'm curious if there are indicators or simple heuristics that can guide exit points based on round behavior rather than pure guesswork. Concrete strategies or rules of thumb would be a big help for someone still learning how to read multiplier graphs effectively.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Timing the exit in Aviator feels like a guessing game, and I want to move beyond hoping for luck. Some players say early exits at around 1.5x protect your bankroll, while others recommend chasing higher multipliers for bigger wins. I'm curious if there are indicators or simple heuristics that can guide exit points based on round behavior rather than pure guesswork. Concrete strategies or rules of thumb would be a big help for someone still learning how to read multiplier graphs effectively.</div>

  ...

  Cancel
• 
  #2 kris1998 on 27 Jul 25

   

  I experimented with fixed targets-always selling at 1.8x or closing at 2.0x-but neither approach provided consistent success. The issue is that some rounds decelerate early while others accelerate unpredictably, so a static number doesn't adapt to changing game speed. Even using small sample sizes to test responses left me doubting my decisions. I need a method that factors in recent performance or velocity of rise to choose a more dynamic exit threshold rather than arbitrarily locking in a multiplier.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">I experimented with fixed targets-always selling at 1.8x or closing at 2.0x-but neither approach provided consistent success. The issue is that some rounds decelerate early while others accelerate unpredictably, so a static number doesn't adapt to changing game speed. Even using small sample sizes to test responses left me doubting my decisions. I need a method that factors in recent performance or velocity of rise to choose a more dynamic exit threshold rather than arbitrarily locking in a multiplier.</div>

  ...

  Cancel
• 
  #3 denis12 on 27 Jul 25

   

  Dynamic exit strategies became reliable once I combined pattern observation with practical simulation. I recorded about a hundred demo round results to identify average crash points and the frequency of slower versus faster climbs. With that data, I established two tiers: a conservative 1.6x exit when rounds climbed rapidly from the start, and a more aggressive 2.2x in gradual‑rise rounds. I practiced this in demo mode until confident, then switched to live play on https://erra.pk/. Post‑implementation, I noticed a marked reduction in premature crashes and a smoother profit curve. Instead of chasing random highs, I let the exit rule adjust to game pace, which provided a more stable series of small gains.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Dynamic exit strategies became reliable once I combined pattern observation with practical simulation. I recorded about a hundred demo round results to identify average crash points and the frequency of slower versus faster climbs. With that data, I established two tiers: a conservative 1.6x exit when rounds climbed rapidly from the start, and a more aggressive 2.2x in gradual‑rise rounds. I practiced this in demo mode until confident, then switched to live play on <a href="https://erra.pk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://erra.pk/</a>. Post‑implementation, I noticed a marked reduction in premature crashes and a smoother profit curve. Instead of chasing random highs, I let the exit rule adjust to game pace, which provided a more stable series of small gains.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top