C++ Interop is recommended over explicit PInvoke because it provides better type safety, is typically less tedious to implement, is more forgiving if the unmanaged API is modified, and makes performance enhancements possible that are not possible with explicit PInvoke.
Group items tagged
JSEnhancements - 2 views
-
This extension provides outlining and matching braces highlighting features for Visual Studio JavaScript editor.
Search Work Items for TFS 2010 - 1 views
Using C++ Interop (Implicit PInvoke) - 0 views
-
-
C++ Interop allows COM components to be accessed at will and does not require separate interop assemblies
-
Because it is the language of the native APIs, Visual C++ has a special status on Windows which makes it the best language for interacting with the platform APIs -- whether those are pure C++ APIs or COM components. This is partly due to the fact that unlike other .NET languages, Visual C++ allows managed and unmanaged code to exist in the same application and even in the same file ... allowing integration with existing apps and platform APIs that is just not possible in other .NET languages.
Visual Studio 2005: Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 (SP1) - 0 views
-
If you want to run Visual Studio 2005 on Vista, you need SP1
If you want to develop web applications in Visual Studio 2005, you need SP1 -
Like this http://cheaptravelbooker.com Like this http://cheaptravelbooker.com like this http://killdo.de.gg travel,hotel,fun,hotel new,new offer,hotel best,best hotel,hotel travel,seo,backlinks,edu,gov,ads,indexing,bookmark,killgoggle,gogglesuck,goggle bookmark,kill goggle,yahoo,bing,indexing,quality links,linkwell,traffic boster,index best
Protected Mode Broker Functions - 0 views
CSS Improvements in Internet Explorer 8 - 0 views
XAML Power Toys - Karl On WPF - 0 views
-
XAML Power Toys is a Visual Studio 2008 SP1 Add-In that empowers WPF & Silverlight developers working in the XAML editor. Its Line of Business form generation tools, Grid tools, DataGrid and ListView generation really shorten the XAML page layout time.
GENNIT Code Generation - 0 views
-
Access to tested generators, a designer for building your project, FXCOP'd source files, XHTML, NUnit Testing Code, VS.NET 2005/Express solution files and SQL scripts.
-
An early beta of a code-generation webservice which lets you create UML-like diagrams and generate code (with tests and everything).
Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) Banned Function Calls - 0 views
-
Microsoft's official list of "banned" unsafe function calls. Basically this is a list of all the SafeCRT and StrSafe.h function equivalencies ... along with a short discussion of the relative merits for StrSafe vs. SafeCRT... also includes some *very* useful examples.
PowerCommands for Visual Studio 2008 - Code Gallery - 0 views
-
PowerCommands 1.1 is a set of useful extensions for the Visual Studio 2008 adding additional functionality to various areas of the IDE
TFS (VS 2008 and .NET 3.5 SP1) ... Beta - bharry's blog - 0 views
-
A Preview of what's new in Team Foundation Server 2008 with SP1 ... this SP1 thing is shaping up to be a major release...
SecurityElement.Escape Method (System.Security) - 0 views
Mouse Gestures add-in for Visual Studio - Home - 0 views
-
Adds mouse-gesture support for visual studio 2008 (and 2005?)
Storyboard Designer - CodePlex - 0 views
VSX Samples - Code Gallery - 0 views
-
Sample code for Visual Studio eXtensibility
WPF 3 (aka VS 2008 and .NET 3.5 SP1) ... Beta - Tim Sneath - 0 views
-
The WPF team is particularly excited about .Net 3.5 SP1, calling it the Third Major Release of Windows Presentation Foundation ...
Visual LINQ query builder (For LINQ to SQL) -- Mitsu's blog - 0 views
-
The Visual LINQ query builder is a Visual Studio 2008 addin. It's a designer that helps you create Linq to Sql queries in your application.
VS Command Shell - CodePlex - 0 views
-
VSCmdShell provides users with a shell window inside the Visual Studio IDE that can be used for Visual Studio commands as well. Allows using either Windows Command Shell (cmd.exe) or Windows PowerShell.
Google vs Xerox on R&D | Computerworld Blogs - 0 views
-
Google does R&D but has no dedicated researchers or formal lab organization. Every engineer is considered part of the virtual R&D team and is expected to donate 20% of his time - about one day a week - to research. Xerox takes the traditional approach, investing in a separate R&D function that includes basic research ... what makes each approach successful?
-
Not really a fair comparison -- what has Google's R&D produced? The Android?
« First
‹ Previous
61 - 80 of 128
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page