In one, scientists dressed newborns in gender-neutral clothes and misled adults about their sex. The adults described the "boys" (actually girls) as angry or distressed more often than did adults who thought they were observing girls, and described the "girls" (actually boys) as happy and socially engaged more than adults who knew the babies were boys. Dozens of such disguised-gender experiments have shown that adults perceive baby boys and girls differently, seeing identical behavior through a gender-tinted lens. In another study, mothers estimated how steep a slope their 11-month-olds could crawl down. Moms of boys got it right to within one degree; moms of girls underestimated what their daughters could do by nine degrees, even though there are no differences in the motor skills of infant boys and girls. But that prejudice may cause parents to unconsciously limit their daughter's physical activity. How we perceive children-sociable or remote, physically bold or reticent-shapes how we treat them and therefore what experiences we give them. Since life leaves footprints on the very structure and function of the brain, these various experiences produce sex differences in adult behavior and brains-the result not of innate and inborn nature but of nurture.
Contents contributed and discussions participated by Yukako Ito
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20▼ items per page
> I chose http://www.newhorizons.org/neuro/diamond_male_female.htm because...
>
> T - this site is trustworthy because it is written by neuroscientists who understand the topic well.
> O - this site has a good objective because it states results of tests and quantitative data in a table.
> E - It has lots of information that is useful
> C - this is also a current source
> A - concluding from the author, i think this is very accurate.
> P - this is to inform
>
> MICDS LIBRARY wrote:
> > Using the TOECAP criteria, give a one paragraph summary of why you chose this site. Specifically discuss the elements of TOECAP.